Google · model passport
Gemma 2 9b It
gemma-2-9b-it- Open weights
- Gemma license licence
- 9.2B params
- Released 2024-06-27(curated)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,267#293 of 396
- Best percentile
- 26.3Overall
- Cohort standing
- 27.4median 36.2
What the data says
Benchmarked on 7 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Weakest axes
- 3 pct — AIME (math) (0.6%)
- 7.7 pct — GPQA Diamond (27.5%)
Uneven: 23.3 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 26.3 pct on Overall versus 3 pct on AIME (math).
- Overall26.3 pct1,267Verify →
- Instruction following25.5 pct1,245Verify →
- Hard prompts24 pct1,257Verify →
- Coding20.7 pct1,270Verify →
- LiveBench16.5 pct31.3%Verify →
- GPQA Diamond7.7 pct27.5%Verify →
- AIME (math)3 pct0.6%Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "google/gemma-2-9b-it"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
gemma-2-9b-it stands at 27.4 (raw mean 17.7) — measured on 7 of 27 axes.
gemma-2-9b-it stands at 27.4 versus a cohort median of 36.2 across 127 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
gemma-2-9b-it scores in the 3rd percentile on AIME (math).
gemma-2-9b-it scores at percentile 7.7 on GPQA Diamond.
gemma-2-9b-it ranks between #301 and #1,011 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Conversation-first", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →