Google · model passport
Google: Gemma 2 27B
gemma-2-27b-it- Open weights
- Gemma license licence
- 27.2B params
- 8,192 context
- Released 2024-06-27(curated)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,290#273 of 396
- Best percentile
- 31.3Overall
- Cohort standing
- 32.0median 36.2
What the data says
Benchmarked on 7 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Weakest axes
- 6 pct — AIME (math) (1.4%)
Uneven: 25.3 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 31.3 pct on Overall versus 6 pct on AIME (math).
- Overall31.3 pct1,290Verify →
- Instruction following30.8 pct1,271Verify →
- LiveBench29.2 pct41.2%Verify →
- Hard prompts28.8 pct1,282Verify →
- Coding26.3 pct1,304Verify →
- GPQA Diamond17.6 pct36.5%Verify →
- AIME (math)6 pct1.4%Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "google/gemma-2-27b-it"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Use it hosted
google/gemma-2-27b-itAPI parameters this endpoint supports
Example request
curl https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENROUTER_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"model":"google/gemma-2-27b-it","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Hello"}]}'Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
gemma-2-27b-it stands at 32 (raw mean 24.3) — measured on 7 of 27 axes.
gemma-2-27b-it stands at 32 versus a cohort median of 36.2 across 127 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
gemma-2-27b-it scores in the 6th percentile on AIME (math).
gemma-2-27b-it ranks between #276 and #963 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Conversation-first", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →