Google · model passport

Gemini Pro Dev API

gemini-pro-dev-api

Cloud only
Proprietary licence
Released 2023-12-13(curated)

Overall · LMArena: 1,237#307 of 396
Best percentile: 22.7Overall
Cohort standing: 32.9median 28.9

What the data says

Benchmarked on 4 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.

Uneven: 7.1 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 22.7 pct on Overall versus 15.6 pct on Coding.

Overall22.7 pct1,237Verify →
Instruction following21.2 pct1,210Verify →
Hard prompts21 pct1,232Verify →
Coding15.6 pct1,240Verify →
WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
Search ArenaNot benchmarked
Document ArenaNot benchmarked
Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
AIME (math)Not benchmarked
FrontierMathNot benchmarked
SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
LiveBenchNot benchmarked
BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked

Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.

gemini-pro-dev-api stands at 32.9 (raw mean 20.1) — measured on 4 of 27 axes.
standingtemplateVerify →
gemini-pro-dev-api stands at 32.9 versus a cohort median of 28.9 across 82 models released within 180 days — above the peer median.
cohorttemplateVerify →

Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →