Google · model passport
Gemini 2 5 Flash Lite Preview 09 2025 No Thinking
gemini-2-5-flash-lite-preview-09-2025-no-thinking- Cloud only
- Proprietary licence
- Released 2025-09-01(from model name)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,379#174 of 396
- Best percentile
- 56.3Overall
- Cohort standing
- 47.2median 52.0
What the data says
Benchmarked on 6 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Uneven: 36.5 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 56.3 pct on Overall versus 19.8 pct on Factuality Arena.
- Overall56.3 pct1,379Verify →
- Instruction following55.3 pct1,364Verify →
- Hard prompts54.8 pct1,391Verify →
- Coding49.9 pct1,397Verify →
- Vision Arena38.7 pct1,175Verify →
- Factuality Arena19.8 pct1,407Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
gemini-2.5-flash-lite-preview-09-2025-no-thinking stands at 47.2 (raw mean 45.8) — measured on 6 of 27 axes.
gemini-2.5-flash-lite-preview-09-2025-no-thinking stands at 47.2 versus a cohort median of 52 across 147 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
gemini-2.5-flash-lite-preview-09-2025-no-thinking ranks between #170 and #613 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →