Moonshot · model passport
Fireworks/kimi K2p5
fireworks/kimi-k2p5- Best percentile
- 74.5AIME (math)
- Composite standing
- 61.5shrunk · 3/27 axes
What the data says
Benchmarked on 3 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Uneven: 3.5 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 74.5 pct on AIME (math) versus 71 pct on FrontierMath.
- AIME (math)74.5 pct92.2%Verify →
- GPQA Diamond73.8 pct87.6%Verify →
- FrontierMath71 pct27.9%Verify →
- OverallNot benchmarked
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
- CodingNot benchmarked
- Instruction followingNot benchmarked
- Hard promptsNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
fireworks/kimi-k2p5 stands at 61.5 (raw mean 73.1) — measured on 3 of 27 axes.
fireworks/kimi-k2p5 ranks between #80 and #115 across 3 built-in weightings — best under "Reasoning", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →