Baidu · model passport
Ernie 5.1
ernie-5-1- Cloud only
- Proprietary licence
- Released 2026-10-13(first seen on LMArena)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,467#44 of 396
- Best percentile
- 89.1Overall
- Cohort standing
- 68.2median 60.6
What the data says
Benchmarked on 6 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Strongest axes
- 89.1 pct — Overall (1,467)
- 88.1 pct — Hard prompts (1,487)
- 87.2 pct — Coding (1,512)
Uneven: 48.6 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 89.1 pct on Overall versus 40.5 pct on Search Arena.
- Overall89.1 pct1,467Verify →
- Hard prompts88.1 pct1,487Verify →
- Coding87.2 pct1,512Verify →
- Instruction following87.1 pct1,452Verify →
- Factuality Arena72.1 pct1,456Verify →
- Search Arena40.5 pct1,192Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
ernie-5.1 stands at 68.2 (raw mean 77.4) — measured on 6 of 27 axes.
ernie-5.1 stands at 68.2 versus a cohort median of 60.6 across 168 models released within 180 days — above the peer median.
ernie-5.1 scores at percentile 89.1 on Overall.
ernie-5.1 scores at percentile 88.1 on Hard prompts.
ernie-5.1 ranks between #47 and #178 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Conversation-first", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →