Model passport
Dolly V2 12b
dolly-v2-12b- Open weights
- MIT licence
- Released 2023-04-12(curated)
- Overall · LMArena
- 983#394 of 396
- Best percentile
- 1.0Hard prompts
- Cohort standing
- 21.9median 25.6
What the data says
Benchmarked on 4 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Weakest axes
- 0.8 pct — Instruction following (940)
- 0.8 pct — Coding (963)
- 0.8 pct — Overall (983)
Uneven: 0.2 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 1 pct on Hard prompts versus 0.8 pct on Instruction following.
- Hard prompts1 pct974Verify →
- Overall0.8 pct983Verify →
- Coding0.8 pct963Verify →
- Instruction following0.8 pct940Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
dolly-v2-12b stands at 21.9 (raw mean 0.8) — measured on 4 of 27 axes.
dolly-v2-12b stands at 21.9 versus a cohort median of 25.6 across 29 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
dolly-v2-12b scores at percentile 0.8 on Overall.
dolly-v2-12b scores at percentile 0.8 on Coding.
dolly-v2-12b ranks between #409 and #890 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Conversation-first", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →