Mistral · model passport
Devstral 2
devstral-2- Open weights
- Modified MIT licence
- Released 2026-10-13(first seen on LMArena)
- Best percentile
- 54.7MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)
- Cohort standing
- 42.8median 60.8
What the data says
Benchmarked on 4 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Weakest axes
- 5.8 pct — WebDev Arena (1,197)
Uneven: 48.9 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 54.7 pct on MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis) versus 5.8 pct on WebDev Arena.
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)54.7 pct76.2%Verify →
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)53.1 pct44.8%Verify →
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)35.8 pct38.1%Verify →
- WebDev Arena5.8 pct1,197Verify →
- OverallNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
- CodingNot benchmarked
- Instruction followingNot benchmarked
- Hard promptsNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
Devstral 2 stands at 42.8 (raw mean 37.3) — measured on 4 of 27 axes.
Devstral 2 stands at 42.8 versus a cohort median of 60.8 across 168 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
Devstral 2 scores at percentile 5.8 on WebDev Arena.
Devstral 2 ranks between #149 and #666 across 4 built-in weightings — best under "Agentic", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →