DeepSeek · model passport
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
deepseek-v4-flash- Open weights
- MIT licence
- 304.2B params
- 1,048,576 context
- Released 2026-07-31(HF repo created)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,436#93 of 396
- Best percentile
- 78.3Instruction following
- Cohort standing
- 63.2median 59.8
What the data says
Benchmarked on 9 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Uneven: 35.8 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 78.3 pct on Instruction following versus 42.5 pct on SimpleBench.
- Instruction following78.3 pct1,428Verify →
- WebDev Arena77.7 pct1,582Verify →
- Hard prompts77.5 pct1,459Verify →
- Overall76.8 pct1,436Verify →
- Coding76 pct1,484Verify →
- LiveBench73.9 pct65.5%Verify →
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)54 pct47.2%Verify →
- Factuality Arena51.2 pct1,439Verify →
- SimpleBench42.5 pct46.3%Verify →
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Use it hosted
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731API parameters this endpoint supports
Example request
curl https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENROUTER_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"model":"deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Hello"}]}'Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
deepseek-v4-flash stands at 63.2 (raw mean 67.5) — measured on 9 of 27 axes.
deepseek-v4-flash stands at 63.2 versus a cohort median of 59.8 across 193 models released within 180 days — above the peer median.
deepseek-v4-flash ranks between #42 and #184 across 6 built-in weightings — best under "Agentic", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →