DeepSeek · model passport
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017- Open weights
- 1,048,576 context
- Released 2026-10-17(OpenRouter model id)
- Best percentile
- 93.1AIME (math)
- Cohort standing
- 66.3median 57.6
What the data says
Benchmarked on 4 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Strongest axes
- 93.1 pct — AIME (math) (99.4%)
- 91.5 pct — GPQA Diamond (93.2%)
Uneven: 45.5 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 93.1 pct on AIME (math) versus 47.6 pct on SimpleQA Verified.
- AIME (math)93.1 pct99.4%Verify →
- GPQA Diamond91.5 pct93.2%Verify →
- ARC-AGI-282.1 pct78.1%Verify →
- SimpleQA Verified47.6 pct42.5%Verify →
- OverallNot benchmarked
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
- CodingNot benchmarked
- Instruction followingNot benchmarked
- Hard promptsNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Use it hosted
API parameters this endpoint supports
Context, limits and prices come from the last catalogue sync; the API id, the request and the link come from the provider's own documentation. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
The DeepSeek deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 model covers 4 of 27 axes with a composite score of 78.6, resulting in a shrunk score of 66.3 and is not thin coverage.
standingVerify →The DeepSeek deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 model achieved a standing of 66.3, which is above the cohort median standing of 57.6 across 224 models within an 180-day window.
cohortVerify →
The DeepSeek deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 model shows a sensitivity spread of 204 across 4 templates, with Reasoning as the best-under template and Conversation-first as the worst-under template at ranks 22 to 226.
rank swingVerify →
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →