DeepSeek · model passport
DeepSeek V3 2 Thinking
deepseek-v3-2-thinking- Open weights
- MIT licence
- Released 2026-10-13(first seen on LMArena)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,422#115 of 396
- Best percentile
- 75.6LiveBench
- Cohort standing
- 58.8median 60.8
What the data says
Benchmarked on 7 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Uneven: 46.8 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 75.6 pct on LiveBench versus 28.8 pct on WebDev Arena.
- LiveBench75.6 pct66.2%Verify →
- Instruction following75 pct1,419Verify →
- Coding73.7 pct1,475Verify →
- Hard prompts72.5 pct1,446Verify →
- Overall71.2 pct1,422Verify →
- Factuality Arena41.3 pct1,432Verify →
- WebDev Arena28.8 pct1,362Verify →
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
deepseek-v3.2-thinking stands at 58.8 (raw mean 62.6) — measured on 7 of 27 axes.
deepseek-v3.2-thinking stands at 58.8 versus a cohort median of 60.8 across 168 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
deepseek-v3.2-thinking ranks between #103 and #345 across 6 built-in weightings — best under "Agentic", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →