DeepSeek · model passport
DeepSeek V3 2 Exp Thinking
deepseek-v3-2-exp-thinking- Open weights
- MIT licence
- Released 2026-10-15(first seen on LMArena)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,425#110 of 396
- Best percentile
- 73.4Coding
- Cohort standing
- 63.5median 60.6
What the data says
Benchmarked on 6 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Uneven: 12.9 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 73.4 pct on Coding versus 60.5 pct on Factuality Arena.
- Coding73.4 pct1,475Verify →
- Instruction following73.2 pct1,416Verify →
- Hard prompts73.2 pct1,446Verify →
- Overall72.5 pct1,425Verify →
- LiveBench68.4 pct63.1%Verify →
- Factuality Arena60.5 pct1,446Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
deepseek-v3.2-exp-thinking stands at 63.5 (raw mean 70.2) — measured on 6 of 27 axes.
deepseek-v3.2-exp-thinking stands at 63.5 versus a cohort median of 60.6 across 169 models released within 180 days — above the peer median.
deepseek-v3.2-exp-thinking ranks between #77 and #180 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →