DeepSeek-AI · model passport
DeepSeek V3
deepseek-v3- Open weights
- DeepSeek licence
- 684.5B params
- Released 2024-12-26(curated)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,358#192 of 396
- Best percentile
- 77.1HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)
- Cohort standing
- 44.2median 42.0
What the data says
Benchmarked on 13 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Weakest axes
- 6.9 pct — SimpleBench (18.9%)
Uneven: 70.2 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 77.1 pct on HHEM Hallucination (Vectara) versus 6.9 pct on SimpleBench.
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)77.1 pct93.9%Verify →
- LiveBench63.6 pct60.5%Verify →
- Overall51.8 pct1,358Verify →
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)51.7 pct75.2%Verify →
- Instruction following50.8 pct1,343Verify →
- Coding47.3 pct1,387Verify →
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)46.6 pct35.9%Verify →
- Hard prompts45.5 pct1,350Verify →
- GPQA Diamond40.3 pct56.5%Verify →
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)28.7 pct34.8%Verify →
- AIME (math)26.5 pct15.8%Verify →
- FrontierMath20.3 pct1.7%Verify →
- SimpleBench6.9 pct18.9%Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
deepseek-v3 stands at 44.2 (raw mean 42.8) — measured on 13 of 27 axes.
deepseek-v3 stands at 44.2 versus a cohort median of 42 across 138 models released within 180 days — above the peer median.
deepseek-v3 scores at percentile 6.9 on SimpleBench.
deepseek-v3 ranks between #178 and #644 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Conversation-first", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →