DeepSeek · model passport
DeepSeek V2 5
deepseek-v2-5- Open weights
- DeepSeek licence
- 235.7B params
- Released 2024-09-05(curated)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,307#257 of 396
- Best percentile
- 41.2Coding
- Cohort standing
- 41.3median 37.9
What the data says
Benchmarked on 6 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Uneven: 8.2 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 41.2 pct on Coding versus 33 pct on MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis).
- Coding41.2 pct1,368Verify →
- LiveBench38.8 pct48.1%Verify →
- Hard prompts37.9 pct1,321Verify →
- Instruction following35.9 pct1,291Verify →
- Overall35.4 pct1,307Verify →
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)33 pct66.6%Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V2.5"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
deepseek-v2.5 stands at 41.3 (raw mean 37) — measured on 6 of 27 axes.
deepseek-v2.5 stands at 41.3 versus a cohort median of 37.9 across 130 models released within 180 days — above the peer median.
deepseek-v2.5 ranks between #207 and #661 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →