DeepSeek · model passport
DeepSeek: R1 0528
deepseek-r1-0528- Open weights
- MIT licence
- 684.5B params
- 163,840 context
- Released 2025-05-28(curated)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,421#118 of 396
- Best percentile
- 90.6MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)
- Cohort standing
- 58.5median 50.4
What the data says
Benchmarked on 12 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Strongest axes
- 90.6 pct — MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis) (84.9%)
- 86.6 pct — LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis) (77.0%)
Uneven: 71.5 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 90.6 pct on MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis) versus 19.1 pct on ARC-AGI-2.
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)90.6 pct84.9%Verify →
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)86.6 pct77.0%Verify →
- LiveBench80.4 pct69.4%Verify →
- Overall70.5 pct1,421Verify →
- Coding69.6 pct1,464Verify →
- Hard prompts68.2 pct1,433Verify →
- Instruction following63.4 pct1,391Verify →
- GPQA Diamond57 pct76.3%Verify →
- AIME (math)47 pct66.4%Verify →
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)40.1 pct39.6%Verify →
- SimpleBench34.5 pct40.8%Verify →
- ARC-AGI-219.1 pct1.1%Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-0528"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Use it hosted
deepseek/deepseek-r1-0528API parameters this endpoint supports
Example request
curl https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENROUTER_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"model":"deepseek/deepseek-r1-0528","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Hello"}]}'Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
deepseek-r1-0528 stands at 58.5 (raw mean 60.6) — measured on 12 of 27 axes.
deepseek-r1-0528 stands at 58.5 versus a cohort median of 50.4 across 145 models released within 180 days — above the peer median.
deepseek-r1-0528 scores at percentile 90.6 on MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis).
deepseek-r1-0528 scores at percentile 86.6 on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis).
deepseek-r1-0528 ranks between #88 and #250 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "Reasoning".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →