Meta · model passport
Codellama 70b Instruct
codellama-70b-instruct- Open weights
- Llama 2 Community licence
- 69.0B params
- Released 2024-01-29(curated)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,119#374 of 396
- Best percentile
- 11.1Hard prompts
- Cohort standing
- 28.8median 30.0
What the data says
Benchmarked on 3 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Weakest axes
- 5.8 pct — Overall (1,119)
- 6.1 pct — Instruction following (1,098)
- 11.1 pct — Hard prompts (1,160)
Uneven: 5.3 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 11.1 pct on Hard prompts versus 5.8 pct on Overall.
- Hard prompts11.1 pct1,160Verify →
- Instruction following6.1 pct1,098Verify →
- Overall5.8 pct1,119Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
- CodingNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "meta-llama/CodeLlama-70b-Instruct-hf"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
codellama-70b-instruct stands at 28.8 (raw mean 7.7) — measured on 3 of 27 axes.
codellama-70b-instruct stands at 28.8 versus a cohort median of 30 across 90 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
codellama-70b-instruct scores at percentile 5.8 on Overall.
codellama-70b-instruct scores at percentile 6.1 on Instruction following.
codellama-70b-instruct ranks between #388 and #825 across 4 built-in weightings — best under "Reasoning", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →