Amazon · model passport
Amazon Nova Pro V1 0
amazon-nova-pro-v1-0- Cloud only
- Proprietary licence
- Released 2024-12-03(curated)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,290#271 of 396
- Best percentile
- 34.3Coding
- Cohort standing
- 36.1median 41.6
What the data says
Benchmarked on 5 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Weakest axes
- 10 pct — Vision Arena (1,018)
Uneven: 24.3 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 34.3 pct on Coding versus 10 pct on Vision Arena.
- Coding34.3 pct1,343Verify →
- Overall31.8 pct1,290Verify →
- Instruction following31.6 pct1,276Verify →
- Hard prompts31.1 pct1,303Verify →
- Vision Arena10 pct1,018Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
amazon-nova-pro-v1.0 stands at 36.1 (raw mean 27.7) — measured on 5 of 27 axes.
amazon-nova-pro-v1.0 stands at 36.1 versus a cohort median of 41.6 across 138 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
amazon-nova-pro-v1.0 scores in the 10th percentile on Vision Arena.
amazon-nova-pro-v1.0 ranks between #243 and #855 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →