Skip to content

Amazon · model passport

amazon.nova-pro-v1:0

amazon-nova-pro-v1:0
3/27axes covered
Best percentile
31.6LiveBench
Composite standing
35.4shrunk · 3/27 axes

What the data says

Benchmarked on 3 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.

Weakest axes

  • 8.7 pct — Humanity's Last Exam (4.4%)

Uneven: 22.9 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 31.6 pct on LiveBench versus 8.7 pct on Humanity's Last Exam.

  • LiveBench31.6 pct43.5%Verify →
  • BFCL v4 (function calling)Dormant board22 pct25.0%Verify →
  • Humanity's Last Exam8.7 pct4.4%Verify →
  • OverallNot benchmarked
  • WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Search ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Document ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
  • GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
  • AIME (math)Not benchmarked
  • FrontierMathNot benchmarked
  • SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
  • ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
  • SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
  • SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
  • MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
  • LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
  • IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
  • HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
  • SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
  • Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
  • CodingNot benchmarked
  • Instruction followingNot benchmarked
  • Hard promptsNot benchmarked

Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.

  • amazon.nova-pro-v1:0 stands at 35.4 (raw mean 20.8) — measured on 3 of 27 axes.

    standingtemplateVerify →

Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →