audit-project
De la autor
Use when the user says "audit my code", "find all the bugs", "review until clean", or "grill my changes". Not for remote, credential, or irreversible changes.
Instalare
npx skills add OutlineDriven/outline-driven-development --skill audit-project -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/audit-project/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
Vrei ca agentul să-ți propună skill-uri în timp ce scrii? Vezi cum folosești skill-urile din IDE.
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 82
aiqbench calculează scorul de încredere din semnale publice. Nu este un audit de securitate, așa că citește un skill înainte să-l instalezi.
Skill-uri similare
Cele mai apropiate de acesta prin ce fac și când sunt folosite.
- reviewhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsGive advisory feedback on a plan, design or code change. Use when: asked for an opinion or a look-over, even informally. Not for acceptance; use Validate.Inginerie★ 1.4K
- code-reviewcbrock84/headcountConducts and responds to code review — reviewing a change for correctness, design, and risk, and evaluating review feedback received on your own work. Use this before merging, when asked to review a diff or pull request, when review feedback has arrived and needs acting on, or when feedback seems wrong and needs a reasoned response rather than compliance.Inginerie★ 2.1K
- code-auditarcasilesgroup/ai-engineeringReview code for correctness bugs, concurrency and lifecycle errors, type-safety holes, error handling gaps, API-contract breaks, and maintainability problems, with every finding gated on a concrete failure scenario. Use when asked to review code, check a diff or branch for bugs, look for problems before committing or opening a PR, or assess code quality.Inginerie★ 61
- review-codetobihagemann/turboReview code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, API misuse, consistency issues, simplicity problems, or test coverage gaps and low-value tests by running internal reviews and a peer review in parallel and returning combined findings. Single-concern with a type argument, or full review with no argument. Use when the user asks to "review my code", "full code review", "review my changes", "check for bugs", "scan for bugs", "review correctness", "security audit", "find vulnerabilities", "review security", "check API usage", "verify against docs", "check for cross-file duplication", "review consistency", "check for code reuse", "review simplicity", "find untested code", "find redundant tests", or "review test coverage".Inginerie★ 416
- tune-recontonone-ai/tononeAudit existing fine-tuning or prompt engineering work — find quality gaps and optimization opportunities. Use when asked to "audit our fine-tuning work", "find prompt engineering gaps", or "look for optimization opportunities".Altele★ 76
- ui-auditnahid-sparktales/agent-dispatcherReview an existing interface and return ranked, concrete findings — each with its location, the user consequence, and a specific fix — instead of taste notes. Use when asked to critique, audit or review a screen or flow, when someone's UI work needs judging, or when an interface "feels off" and the problem needs naming. Not for proving a change renders and functions, not for inventing a new visual direction, and not for an accessibility conformance audit, which is its own discipline.Design★ 59
Note și recenzii
—
nicio recenzie
Ai încercat acest skill? Notează-l ca să-i ajuți pe alții. Autentifică-te
Discuție
Intră în discuție. Autentifică-te