dueling-autoresearch
De la autor
Use when the user wants two approaches raced head-to-head on a single shared metric — e.g. a classical/algorithmic lane vs an ML/learned lane, or any two strategies for the same task. Each lane runs its own analysis-first research loop confined to its lane, the lanes share a scoreboard and may borrow ideas across the boundary without abandoning their identity, and a shared eval keeps the head-to-head honest; loops until interrupted, reporting the current leader. Not for improving a single approach in isolation (use a single-track research loop), and not for picking between two finished artifacts in one shot (that is a one-time comparison).
Instalare
npx skills add gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills --skill dueling-autoresearch -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/dueling-autoresearch/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
Vrei ca agentul să-ți propună skill-uri în timp ce scrii? Vezi cum folosești skill-urile din IDE.
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 80
aiqbench calculează scorul de încredere din semnale publice. Nu este un audit de securitate, așa că citește un skill înainte să-l instalezi.
Skill-uri similare
Cele mai apropiate de acesta prin ce fac și când sunt folosite.
- ml-autoresearchgaasher/Agent-Loop-SkillsUse when the user wants an autonomous ML research loop that does more than blindly try changes. After every training run the agent analyses what actually happened inside the model — gradients, activations, embeddings, errors, data — and grounds the next change in that evidence. A `<literature>` on/off dial adds scientific-literature grounding: off behaves as a pure analysis-first loop; on searches papers, grades the evidence, and implements only what prior work supports. One change per run; loops forever until interrupted. Not for one-off training runs or hyperparameter sweeps.Știință★ 177
- compare-research-methodsxingtaxueshu/literature-review-skillsCompare research methods for an academic literature review, thesis proposal, or methodology section by linking each method to what it can and cannot answer. Use when the user needs to justify method choice, compare quantitative/qualitative/mixed-method designs, build a methods table, or turn "I will use this method" into a defensible argument tied to the research question.Știință★ 63
- tournament-autoresearchgaasher/Agent-Loop-SkillsUse when the user wants an autonomous ML research loop that pressure-tests competing ideas before spending compute — several research subagents each propose one architecture change, a self-calibrating Judge critiques them against a rubric, the proposers refine, and the Judge picks the single change to run. The Judge learns to pick better over time by scoring its own predictions against realized metric deltas, recording predicted-vs-realized in a calibration ledger and refining its working rubric. The result is an experiment ledger where each iteration's change won a de-biased tournament. Not for running a single pre-decided experiment, and not for analysis-only exploration — for one hypothesis proposed and run per iteration without competition, use the sibling ml-autoresearch loop.Testare★ 177
- autoresearchgithub/awesome-copilotAutonomous iterative experimentation loop for any programming task. Guides the user through defining goals, measurable metrics, and scope constraints, then runs an autonomous loop of code changes, testing, measuring, and keeping/discarding results. Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch. USE FOR: autonomous improvement, iterative optimization, experiment loop, auto research, performance tuning, automated experimentation, hill climbing, try things automatically, optimize code, run experiments, autonomous coding loop. DO NOT USE FOR: one-shot tasks, simple bug fixes, code review, or tasks without a measurable metric.Testare★ 40.4K
- competitive-analysisnahid-sparktales/agent-dispatcherCompare products, libraries or approaches on criteria derived from your own constraints rather than from anyone's feature list, and fill each cell with evidence you obtained — hands-on trial, primary docs, source, issue tracker — marking clearly what is only a vendor claim. Use when choosing between real alternatives, when asked how something stacks up against the competition, or when a decision is being made from a marketing comparison table. Not for general investigation method, not for judging a single source, and not for writing positioning or marketing copy.Finanțe★ 59
- research-routes-runzenx0x/allinlunaExecute an approved Research Routes context across software, research-exploration, or hybrid journeys with concurrent route owners, shared control-plane resources, CounterPilot read-only boundaries, explicit evidence and provenance, lifecycle recovery, and HumanDecision seams. Use when implementation or experiments must proceed without treating AI inference as fact or silently changing canonical state.Știință★ 63
Note și recenzii
—
nicio recenzie
Ai încercat acest skill? Notează-l ca să-i ajuți pe alții. Autentifică-te
Discuție
Intră în discuție. Autentifică-te