folklore-variant-evidence
De la autor
Retrieves ClinGen gene-disease validity assertions for a public gene or disease, and reviews source-linked public evidence and literature for one supported GRCh38 germline nuclear SNV or simple indel through Folklore Clinical Variant Interpretation MCP. Used when a scientific agent must branch deterministically on resolved, ambiguous, not-found, invalid, unsupported, or unavailable variant outcomes; chain a resolved public variant into related literature or publication details; or preserve evidence provenance without accepting patient, phenotype, family, segregation, or private case data.
Instalare
npx skills add K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills --skill folklore-variant-evidence -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/folklore-variant-evidence/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
Vrei ca agentul să-ți propună skill-uri în timp ce scrii? Vezi cum folosești skill-urile din IDE.
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 95
aiqbench calculează scorul de încredere din semnale publice. Nu este un audit de securitate, așa că citește un skill înainte să-l instalezi.
Skill-uri similare
Cele mai apropiate de acesta prin ce fac și când sunt folosite.
- scientific-critical-thinkingK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skillsEvaluates scientific claims and evidence quality. Applies to experimental design validity, biases and confounders, statistical interpretation, evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), and teaching critical analysis. Supports evidence appraisal and identifying flaws; formal peer review writing belongs to peer-review.Știință★ 53.4K
- social-evidence-researchwshobson/agentsResearch public discussion on social platforms and keep every report claim tied to the source material that supports it. Use when researching or comparing how a product, event, or topic is discussed across social platforms or supplied social exports, when turning search results into a cited report, or when auditing a social research report for discovery-only evidence, double-counted reposts, misattributed comments, claims that go beyond the sample, or hidden access gaps.Știință★ 41.4K
- result-to-claimwanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleepUse when experiments complete to judge what claims the results support, what they don't, and what evidence is still missing. Codex MCP evaluates results against intended claims and routes to next action (pivot, supplement, or confirm). Use after experiments finish — before writing the paper or running ablations.Știință★ 17.8K
- variant-analysistrailofbits/skillsHunts for the other instances of a bug already found — the variants of one root cause across a codebase. Use immediately after a vulnerability, logic bug, or bad pattern turns up in a specific file and the question becomes where else it occurs, including the bare conversational form ("are there others like this?", "is this the same bug?"). Also for generalizing one known instance into a CodeQL or Semgrep query for its whole pattern family, and for triaging a set of look-alike candidates against a known root cause. Not for initial discovery with no bug in hand.Securitate★ 7.7K
- test-value-evidencedotnet/skillsAssess tests for an identified code or test change, feature, PR or commit. USE FOR: review changed behavior or regression tests, prove pre-fix/missing behavior is detected, revision-bound red-green evidence. Polyglot. DO NOT USE without an identified change: hypothetical mutations or general suite blind spots (test-gap-analysis). Also exclude per-test readiness/A-F grades (grade-tests), coverage (coverage-analysis), new suites (code-testing), or mutation engines.Testare★ 5.7K
- research-reviewwanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleepGet a deep critical review of research from Claude via claude-review MCP. Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.Știință★ 17.8K
Note și recenzii
—
nicio recenzie
Ai încercat acest skill? Notează-l ca să-i ajuți pe alții. Autentifică-te
Discuție
Intră în discuție. Autentifică-te