Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.539 de skill-uri din 2.407 depozite · actualizat acum 2 minute
49.542 de skill-uri
- wsdm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a WSDM paper - offline ranking and recommendation metrics with bias controls, temporal-split protocols for interaction logs, baseline selection from recent WSDM/SIGIR/KDD editions, ablations that isolate the mechanism, efficiency reporting, and online-evidence framing.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- aaai-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- aaai-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- wacv-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing WACV experiments, covering Applications-track systems evidence (latency, power, robustness under real constraints) versus Algorithms-track matched-baseline novelty, comparative assessment under the deployed condition, uncertainty over seeds and sessions, ablations, and evidence that survives the two-round review.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vldb-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a VLDB paper, covering workload and dataset realism at scale, competitor tuning fairness, scalability curves versus single points, tail-latency and throughput reporting, ablations that isolate the mechanism, and the loss-case disclosure PVLDB reviewers look for first.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vis-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising an IEEE VIS paper for a task-grounded visualization contribution on the first page, a design rationale that ties each visual encoding and interaction to a task, evaluation matched to the contribution type, honest limitations, and disciplined use of the VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget for a paper that will be read as an IEEE TVCG journal article.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ase-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research submission is evaluated, covering double-anonymous review, the early-rejection stage before rebuttal, the Accept / Revision / Reject outcomes, the criteria-bound revision round, and how ASE's process differs from FSE's PACMSE Major Revision, ICSE's cycles, and ISSTA's rounds.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cav-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) submission is evaluated, covering the two-stage reviewing process (two reviews then an early-reject filter, then two more reviews with a rebuttal), the partial double-anonymity by category, the accept/reject outcome, the optional non-conditional artifact evaluation, and how CAV differs from TACAS and FMCAD.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- atc-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) submission is evaluated — the two-round extended-abstract model, the round-one gate by two reviewers, the round-two read by 3-4 reviewers, double-blind reviewing, rebuttal, conditional acceptance with shepherding, and how ATC differs from OSDI/SOSP/NSDI.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- asplos-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ASPLOS campaign across the two-deadline cycle — sequencing evidence building, the September 9, 2026 submission gate, author-response windows, the December 21 notification, Major Revision resubmission six weeks later, artifact evaluation, and the April 2027 conference in Crete, with owners per risk.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cikm-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when turning an accepted CIKM paper into its ACM proceedings version inside the short notification-to-camera-ready window, covering de-anonymization, the e-rights and TAPS pipeline into the ACM Digital Library, CCS concepts and metadata, GenAI-disclosure retention, artifact link publication, and Rome presentation logistics.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cell-star-methodsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to build Cell's mandatory STAR Methods — the Key Resources Table, the three Resource Availability subsections, Experimental Model and Subject Details, Method Details, and Quantification and Statistical Analysis, in the exact required order.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- content-marketingkostja94/marketing-skillsWhen the user wants to plan content marketing across channels, define content types and formats, or create a content repurposing strategy. Also use when the user mentions "content marketing strategy," "content types," "content formats," "content repurposing," "content calendar," "content mix," "owned content," "content distribution," "content funnel," or "content planning across channels." For SEO calendar, use content-strategy.MarketingFără avertismente★ 1,1 K↓ —
- research-sourceskostja94/marketing-skillsWhen the user wants to find information sources for content ideation, competitor monitoring, or industry tracking. Also use when the user mentions "research sources," "information sources," "content ideation," "industry monitoring," "competitor monitoring," "market intelligence," "content research," or "topic research." For keywords, use keyword-research.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,1 K↓ —
- creator-programkostja94/marketing-skillsWhen the user wants to plan, implement, or optimize creator program strategy. Also use when the user mentions "creator program," "creator partnership," "content co-creation," "creator ambassador," "creator economy," "creator collaboration," "UGC program," "creator incentives," or "creator community." For influencers, use influencer-marketing.MarketingFără avertismente★ 1,1 K↓ —
- brooks-harnesshyhmrright/brooks-lintMaintenance orchestrator for the brooks-lint plugin itself. Runs a sequential subagent pipeline — author → eval → QA → trigger-audit → release — to add or edit a skill, refresh the eval suite, keep the four manifests + all README translations + CHANGELOG + AGENTS/GEMINI in sync, audit trigger boundaries, and cut releases. Drives the five agents in .claude/agents/ (skill-author, eval-curator, consistency-qa, trigger-boundary-auditor, release-manager). Triggers when the maintainer asks to work ON brooks-lint itself: "add a new skill", "edit the brooks-debt guide", "update the eval suite", "fix the trigger descriptions", "make this change and validate it", "release brooks-lint", "bump and publish", and follow-ups: "re-run", "re-validate", "update that skill", "redo the audit", "do the X part again". Do NOT trigger for: USING the brooks-lint analysis skills on some target codebase (that's brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test / brooks-health / brooks-sweep); generic questions about brooks-lint TestareFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —
- brooks-harnesshyhmrright/brooks-lintMaintenance orchestrator for the brooks-lint plugin itself. Runs a sequential subagent pipeline — author → eval → QA → trigger-audit → release — to add or edit a skill, refresh the eval suite, keep the four manifests + all README translations + CHANGELOG + AGENTS/GEMINI in sync, audit trigger boundaries, and cut releases. Drives the five agents in .codex/agents/ (skill-author, eval-curator, consistency-qa, trigger-boundary-auditor, release-manager). Triggers when the maintainer asks to work ON brooks-lint itself: "add a new skill", "edit the brooks-debt guide", "update the eval suite", "fix the trigger descriptions", "make this change and validate it", "release brooks-lint", "bump and publish", and follow-ups: "re-run", "re-validate", "update that skill", "redo the audit", "do the X part again". Do NOT trigger for: USING the brooks-lint analysis skills on some target codebase (that's brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test / brooks-health / brooks-sweep); generic questions about brooks-lint tTestareFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —
- write-skillsdzhng/skillsCreate or revise agent skills. Use when adding a new skill file, renaming a skill, simplifying an existing skill, improving trigger descriptions, or deciding what belongs in a skill versus references, scripts, assets, or ordinary docs.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ophis-swaphashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsUse when the user wants to swap, trade, buy, sell, or convert tokens onchain, get a best-execution swap quote, compare a swap against DEX aggregators, or read wallet balances, token prices, gas, or fee-rebate tiers. Drives Ophis, an intent-based DEX (a CoW Protocol deployment) that is MEV-protected, gasless for the trader, and keyless. Supports Ethereum, Optimism, Base, Arbitrum, Polygon, BNB, Gnosis, Unichain, Avalanche, Plasma, Ink, and Linea.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- brooks-audithyhmrright/brooks-lintArchitecture audit that maps module dependencies, checks layering integrity, and flags structural decay across a codebase, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to audit architecture, review folder/module structure, check for circular imports, understand how the codebase is organized, or asks "does this follow clean architecture?" or "why does everything depend on everything?". Also triggers for onboarding requests: "explain this codebase to a new developer" or "give me a codebase tour" (use onboarding mode). Do NOT trigger for: PR-level code review (use brooks-review) or line-level refactoring questions — this skill analyzes structural/module-level concerns, not individual functions.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —
- django-tddhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsDjango testing strategies with pytest-django, TDD methodology, factory_boy, mocking, coverage, and testing Django REST Framework APIs.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- agentdock-user-guideuvwt/agentdock当用户询问 AgentDock 是什么、如何使用、配置在哪里、不同平台或安装方式怎样修改配置并生效、如何重启或验证配置、如何发现并配置 Codex/Claude/Grok 等 Coding Agent 的 ACP，以及常见运行问题时使用；覆盖 macOS Desktop、Windows Desktop、Linux 服务、Docker 和直接运行二进制，不用于源码开发与贡献流程。DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- skill-installationuvwt/agentdock审查、安装、配置、验证、更新和移除 AgentDock Skill 时使用；负责来源校验、安全评估、环境配置、content digest、精确 skill_ref 与当前 managed 内容验收。AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- vpe-advisoralirezarezvani/claude-skillsUse when delivery is slowing, eng hiring is broken, team structure is unclear or you need to decide when to add an eng manager. Runs delivery_throughput_analyzer.py (DORA), eng_hiring_funnel_calculator.py and eng_team_structure_designer.py.AlteleFără avertismente★ 29,3 K↓ —
review
dzhng/skills
InginerieActualizat ieri
De la autor
Closeout pass on a finished substantive change — sequence refactor-clean (shape), code-review (diff), and write-docs (docs) so all three run, in the order where each feeds the next. Use after implementing a slice or feature and before calling it done or committing; when the user asks for a final review, a cleanup-and-document pass, or to "review everything." For a diff-only audit, reach code-review directly.
Instalare
npx skills add dzhng/skills --skill review -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/review/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: MIT
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență78
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție51
Fișiere (1)
- SKILL.md