Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.534 de skill-uri din 2.407 depozite · actualizat acum 38 de minute
49.534 de skill-uri
- lancet-writingbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to structure and hold the length of a Lancet Article main text — Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion (~3000–3500 words), the Research in context panel, a limited reference list (~30), and a cautious, globally minded Discussion that does not overstate.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- database-designeralirezarezvani/claude-skillsDesign a database schema: tables, relationships, indexes, normalization, SQL vs NoSQL, migration plans. Use whenever the user asks how to structure their data, which database to pick, or before writing DDL.DateFără avertismente★ 29,3 K↓ —
- icse-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an ICSE research-track paper, covering subject and benchmark selection, baseline fairness, statistical tests and effect sizes as SE reviewers expect them, qualitative-methods rigor, ablations for AI-based techniques, and threats-driven study design.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- icdm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical evaluation for an ICDM (IEEE International Conference on Data Mining) paper - mining-task definition, strong and fairly-tuned baselines, ablations that isolate the named mechanism, scalability curves that test scale claims, and discovery-validity checks that separate real findings from evaluation artifacts.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- icra-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the experimental section of an ICRA paper — real-robot versus simulation-only evidence, trial counts and success-rate reporting, task distributions and resets, baseline fairness on shared hardware, sim-to-real transfer claims, failure-mode analysis, and the statistics robotics reviewers actually expect.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- focs-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding whether and how computation appears in a FOCS (IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science) paper — a venue that accepts on theorems with no evaluation section expected — covering machine-verified case analyses, computer-discovered constructions, and honest illustrative plots.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- hri-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning the supplementary materials for an ACM/IEEE HRI full paper — above all the video figure that shows the embodied interaction, plus study instruments, extended results, and appendices — deciding what a reviewer must see to judge the interaction versus what belongs outside the 8-page body, all anonymized for double-blind review.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- fse-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in an ESEC/FSE paper body versus its anonymized artifact and appendices, covering the ACM-template page budget, the rule that decision-critical evidence stays inside the reviewed pages, double-anonymous supplementary material, and how to split an empirical-SE paper between body and package.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- tech-radarmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsBuild a technology radar for an engineering team, categorizing technologies into Adopt/Trial/Assess/Hold quadrants following the ThoughtWorks Tech Radar format. Use when asked to create a tech radar, evaluate the team's technology landscape, categorize tools and frameworks, or establish a technology strategy. Produces a full tech radar with quadrant tables, individual blip rationales, a decision trail, and a maintenance process guide.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- cvpr-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the experimental program of a CVPR paper, covering benchmark and baseline selection under matched-compute fairness, the ablation study reviewers treat as mandatory, qualitative and failure-case evidence, efficiency metrics tied to the Compute Reporting Form, and generalization tests beyond a single dataset.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- dac-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when drafting or tightening the prose of an ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) Research Manuscript, covering the QoR-forward first-page arc, stating the design-automation contribution as a measured delta, fitting a complete argument into six double-column pages plus a references-only page, building column-width EDA figures, and third-person self-citation for double-blind review.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- eacl-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical evidence for an EACL paper, covering tuned and LLM baselines, multilingual breadth matched to the claim, significance and variance floors, human-evaluation agreement, data-contamination controls, ablations, and error taxonomies, so that every stated result is measured rather than asserted.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cav-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper for a precise verification contribution on the first page, an explicit soundness/completeness statement, theorem-and-proof discipline in the LNCS page budget, fair benchmark claims, honest scope and limits, and double-blind wording for the anonymized categories.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- colt-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding whether a COLT (Conference on Learning Theory) paper needs numerical content at all — COLT has no experiments requirement — and, when numerics genuinely help, designing small illustrative simulations that visualize a proved bound, a separation, or a phase transition without diluting the theory.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- chi-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when drafting or revising the prose of an ACM CHI paper — contribution statements, structure for mixed reviewer audiences, participant voice, calibrated claims, accessible and bias-free writing, and length discipline in a venue that reviews words against contribution instead of pages.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- colm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical core of a COLM paper — contamination analysis for evaluation data, fair baselines under matched prompting and compute, pinned model versions and decoding parameters, uncertainty over runs and samples, scaling coverage, and honest reporting of API-model comparisons.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ase-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when shaping the prose and structure of an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research paper, covering the automation-first first-page arc, stating the automated task precisely, keeping the tool runnable and the model-swap test in mind, threats-as-argument, and the 10+2 page discipline on the ACM acmart template.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- acl-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising an ACL paper for computational-linguistics house style, covering task-first framing, linguistic examples tied to quantitative error analysis, scoping language claims to tested languages, LLM-era claim discipline, anonymous self-reference, Limitations prose, and compressing into the 8-page or 4-page ACL format.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ase-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in the 10-page ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) paper body versus the artifact and supplementary material, splitting content by decision-criticality so nothing that decides acceptance lives outside the reviewed pages under the 10+2 budget.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- acmmm-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning the end-to-end ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) campaign calendar — from thematic-area scoping and track choice, through the April OpenReview abstract/paper/supplement chain, the June anonymous rebuttal, the July decision, the August camera-ready, and the November presentation in Rio, with the right skill invoked at each stage.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- atc-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when drafting or revising an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — writing a self-standing two-page extended abstract for the round-one gate, structuring the implementation-and-measurement narrative, reporting costs beside gains, and holding the two-column 12-page budget.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- wacv-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a WACV submission before an OpenReview round deadline, covering the Round 1 vs Round 2 choice, the Applications vs Algorithms track field, the 8-page-including-figures limit, double-blind anonymity and OpenReview-profile requirements, the anonymized supplement, dual submission, and desk-reject triage.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- uai-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning a UAI submission within the probabilistic reasoning, graphical-model, causality, and Bayesian ML literature, covering PMLR archival status of recent UAI volumes, double-blind self-citation discipline, concurrent arXiv and workshop versions, and the cross-community citation coverage UAI reviewers check first.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vis-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning an IEEE VIS submission against the visualization literature across TVCG, the six VIS areas, EuroVis/CGF, PacificVis, and adjacent HCI/graphics venues, writing delta-first contrast rather than a citation catalog, keeping self-citations double-blind when opted in, and handling concurrent, preprint, and prior-version overlap for a TVCG journal article.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
hri-submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
DocumenteActualizat 27 sept. 2026
De la autor
Use when auditing an ACM/IEEE HRI full-paper submission for PCS readiness — the mandatory abstract-then-paper two-step deadline, choosing the correct one of the five tracks, the 8-page acmart anonymous format, the double-blind sweep across PDF and video, the human-participants ethics acknowledgment, and desk-reject triage before the AoE cutoff.
Instalare
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hri-submission -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/hri-submission/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: MIT
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență77
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție50
Fișiere (1)
- SKILL.md