Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.450 de skill-uri din 2.407 depozite · actualizat acum 22 de minute
49.450 de skill-uri
- oma-securityfirst-fluke/oh-my-agentScan application source, agent skills, and MCP components; run penetration tests against scoped web test deployments, validate findings, and configure scan gates. Use oma-qa for broad quality reviews and domain skills for remediation.SecuritateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- brooks-testhyhmrright/brooks-lintTest quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow execution, poor readability. Triggers when: user asks about test quality, shares test files for review, or expresses frustration: "tests keep breaking whenever I change anything", "our tests take forever", "tests pass but bugs still reach production", or "we have too many mocks". Do NOT trigger for: writing new tests from scratch (use the regular test-writing workflow) or testing framework/syntax questions — this skill reviews an existing suite for structural quality problems, not individual test authoring.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —
- long-task-continuationGanyuanRan/AegisUse when a task is multi-step, may span context resets or sessions, uses subagents, or risks losing state before completion.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- first-principles-reviewGanyuanRan/AegisUse when asked for first-principles or Occam's-razor review, or when high-risk decisions involve competing constraints, fallback growth, duplicate owners, or architecture direction risk. Ordinary bug fixes stay on the fast path.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- dispatching-parallel-agentsGanyuanRan/AegisUse when facing 2+ independent tasks without a written plan, with no conflicting shared mutable state or sequential dependencies, where parallel delegation beats inline cost; otherwise inline. Planned tasks use subagent-driven-development.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- recording-architecture-decisionsGanyuanRan/AegisUse when the user asks to create, write, update, amend, supersede, or evaluate an ADR, architecture decision record, durable architecture decision, decision log, or baseline sync after architecture-changing work.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- robots-txtkostja94/marketing-skillsWhen the user wants to configure, audit, or optimize robots.txt. Also use when the user mentions "robots.txt," "crawler rules," "block crawlers," "AI crawlers," "GPTBot," "allow/disallow," "disallow path," "crawl directives," "user-agent," "block Googlebot," "fix robots.txt," "robots.txt blocking," or "search engine crawling." For indexing, use indexing.BrowserFără avertismente★ 1,1 K↓ —
- domain-selectionkostja94/marketing-skillsWhen the user wants to choose an SEO-friendly domain for a new site—brand vs keyword domain, TLD selection, or domain best practices. Also use when the user mentions "domain choice," "pick domain," "SEO-friendly domain," "brand domain," "EMD," "PMD," "exact match domain," "partial match domain," "TLD," ".ai domain," ".com vs .io," "domain length," "domain history," or "defensive domain registration." For migration, use rebranding-strategy.MarketingFără avertismente★ 1,1 K↓ —
- cell-star-methodsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to build Cell's mandatory STAR Methods — the Key Resources Table, the three Resource Availability subsections, Experimental Model and Subject Details, Method Details, and Quantification and Statistical Analysis, in the exact required order.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cikm-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when turning an accepted CIKM paper into its ACM proceedings version inside the short notification-to-camera-ready window, covering de-anonymization, the e-rights and TAPS pipeline into the ACM Digital Library, CCS concepts and metadata, GenAI-disclosure retention, artifact link publication, and Rome presentation logistics.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- asplos-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ASPLOS campaign across the two-deadline cycle — sequencing evidence building, the September 9, 2026 submission gate, author-response windows, the December 21 notification, Major Revision resubmission six weeks later, artifact evaluation, and the April 2027 conference in Crete, with owners per risk.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- atc-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) submission is evaluated — the two-round extended-abstract model, the round-one gate by two reviewers, the round-two read by 3-4 reviewers, double-blind reviewing, rebuttal, conditional acceptance with shepherding, and how ATC differs from OSDI/SOSP/NSDI.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- valaxy-themeYunYouJun/valaxyCreate or evolve a runnable Valaxy theme from a design brief, reference site, or UI library. Use for valaxy-theme-* packages, AI theme generation, theme starter customization, or adapting AK UI to a Valaxy blog. Covers theme contracts, demo content, packaging, SSR and browser verification. Use the general valaxy Skill for site configuration or article editing without theme development.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,1 K↓ —
- cav-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) submission is evaluated, covering the two-stage reviewing process (two reviews then an early-reject filter, then two more reviews with a rebuttal), the partial double-anonymity by category, the accept/reject outcome, the optional non-conditional artifact evaluation, and how CAV differs from TACAS and FMCAD.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ase-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research submission is evaluated, covering double-anonymous review, the early-rejection stage before rebuttal, the Accept / Revision / Reject outcomes, the criteria-bound revision round, and how ASE's process differs from FSE's PACMSE Major Revision, ICSE's cycles, and ISSTA's rounds.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- minutes-recapsilverstein/minutesGenerate a daily digest of today's policy-authorized meetings and voice memos — key decisions, action items, and themes across available recordings. Use when the user asks "recap my day", "what happened in my meetings today", "daily summary", "what did I discuss today", "any action items from today", or wants a consolidated view of the day's conversations.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
- vis-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising an IEEE VIS paper for a task-grounded visualization contribution on the first page, a design rationale that ties each visual encoding and interaction to a task, evaluation matched to the contribution type, honest limitations, and disciplined use of the VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget for a paper that will be read as an IEEE TVCG journal article.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vldb-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a VLDB paper, covering workload and dataset realism at scale, competitor tuning fairness, scalability curves versus single points, tail-latency and throughput reporting, ablations that isolate the mechanism, and the loss-case disclosure PVLDB reviewers look for first.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- wacv-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing WACV experiments, covering Applications-track systems evidence (latency, power, robustness under real constraints) versus Algorithms-track matched-baseline novelty, comparative assessment under the deployed condition, uncertainty over seeds and sessions, ablations, and evidence that survives the two-round review.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- aaai-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- aaai-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- wsdm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a WSDM paper - offline ranking and recommendation metrics with bias controls, temporal-split protocols for interaction logs, baseline selection from recent WSDM/SIGIR/KDD editions, ablations that isolate the mechanism, efficiency reporting, and online-evidence framing.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- domain-architecturekostja94/marketing-skillsWhen the user wants to decide domain structure for multiple products or brands—subfolder vs subdomain vs independent domain. Also use when the user mentions "subfolder vs subdomain," "subdirectory vs subdomain," "multiple products domain," "multiple websites," "brand architecture," "branded house," "house of brands," "where to host product," "domain structure," or "hub-spoke domain." For brand SERP, use multi-domain-brand-seo.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,1 K↓ —
- sosp-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a SOSP paper — mapping every claim to an experiment, choosing baselines a systems PC will accept as fair, mixing microbenchmarks with end-to-end and failure runs, reporting tails and overheads honestly, and isolating the mechanism the design credits.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
ultragoal
huytieu/COG-second-brain
AlteleActualizat 23 oct. 2026
De la autor
Run a large, multi-session goal (e.g. shipping a whole side product) through the full V-model closed loop, one phase at a time, with cross-session state and a final north-star acceptance gate. Ultragoals never downgrade the lane: every phase runs CP-1→CP-6 with adversarial verification. Opt-in: invoke with /ultragoal or by calling something a long-running goal. Ordinary work does not run this.
Instalare
npx skills add huytieu/COG-second-brain --skill ultragoal -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/ultragoal/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniFolosește rețeauaLicență: MIT
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență77
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție50
Fișiere (1)
- SKILL.md