Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.492 de skill-uri din 2.391 de depozite · actualizat acum 18 ore
49.492 de skill-uri
- yolo-trainingfcakyon/claude-codex-settingsThis skill should be used when user asks to "improve my mAP", "why is my model overfitting", "my training is diverging", "read my results.csv", "interpret my training curves", "my AP50 is good but AP50-95 is bad", "my recall is low", "how do I pick learning rate", "which augmentations should I use", "should I use a bigger model", "tune hyperparameters", or asks how to train YOLO26 for detection, instance or semantic segmentation, pose, OBB, classification, or depth.DateFără avertismente★ 1,2 K↓ —
- fizz-syncpashov/skillsReconcile an existing Fizz harness with a changed source tree. Detects added/removed/changed contract functions, quarantines stale properties, regenerates drifted handler stubs, and refreshes the snapshot. Trigger on "fizz-sync", "resync fuzzing", "sync fuzz harness", "refresh fuzzing properties", "fuzzing drift check".JuridicFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- icde-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsJournal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包，从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程，助你快速发论文。PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- create-prfcakyon/claude-codex-settingsThis skill should be used when user asks to "create a PR", "make a pull request", "open PR for this branch", "submit changes as PR", "push and create PR", or explicitly invokes "create-pr".InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,2 K↓ —
- run-qafcakyon/claude-codex-settingsThis skill should be used when user asks to "run QA", "verify real playback", "test provider connections", or "check website, extension or Android flows" with tracked journeys.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,2 K↓ —
- iclr-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing ICLR experiments, including baselines, ablations, scaling laws, robustness, statistics, benchmarks, human evaluation, and compute reporting. Use when a reviewer questions whether a representation-learning or model gain is real, when you must isolate one mechanism with an ablation, or when preparing a small compute-matched control that can be posted inline during the public discussion period.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- reportevo-hq/evoRead-only evo run reporting. Use when the user invokes /evo:report, asks what happened overnight, asks what improved recently, asks for the best/frontier candidates, asks for a quick score chart without opening the dashboard, or wants the scatter plot in chat output. Never run benchmarks, gates, Slurm commands, evo run, or ad-hoc verification scripts for report requests.MarketingFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
- cav-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper body versus its optional appendix and artifact, covering the LNCS page limits, the rule that reviewers are not obliged to read the appendix so decision-critical content stays in the body, where full proofs and benchmark tables live, and double-anonymous supplementary material for the anonymized categories.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cscw-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical work behind a CSCW paper — interview and ethnographic rigor, trace and log analysis, surveys, deployments, and mixed methods — matching each method's own validity standard and the ethics of studying real communities.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ndss-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an NDSS paper — attack demonstrations, defense evaluations under adaptive adversaries, and Internet measurements — choosing between testbed, emulation, and live experiments and meeting NDSS's deployment-realism evidence bar.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- edbt-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing EDBT empirical evaluations for database-systems work, covering real workloads and datasets, fair and tuned baselines, honest measurement across realistic scales, reproducible harnesses, and the higher bar of the Experiments & Analysis paper where the measurement itself is the contribution.DateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- jetson-optimize-memoryNVIDIA/skillsReclaim DRAM by disabling unused subsystems across MB1 BCT, MB2 BCT, kernel reserved-memory, and SWIOTLB. Use for headless or no-camera Jetson deployments; not for CPU/GPU frequency tuning.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 3,9 K↓ —
- soda-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding whether and how experiments belong in a SODA (ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms) paper — SODA's scope includes experimental validation but theorems carry the decision, so this skill designs supporting numerics honestly and routes implementation-led work to co-located ALENEX or to SEA.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- uai-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising a UAI manuscript for probabilistic-inference readers, enforcing precise notation for distributions, graphs, and interventions, explicit assumption and identifiability statements, an 8-page main part that carries the whole argument while proofs sit in the appendix, and claims calibrated to what the theory and experiments show.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- osdi-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an OSDI submission — choosing mature baselines and realistic workloads, structuring the section around research questions, measuring scalability and tail behavior, quantifying the design's costs, and fitting the evidence into the 12-page reviewed body.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- eccv-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the experimental program of an ECCV paper — benchmark selection that survives a September conference, matched-substrate baseline fairness in the foundation-model era, ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism, qualitative failure evidence, and run sequencing toward a March freeze.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- hri-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when drafting or revising an ACM/IEEE HRI full paper's structure and prose for an interdisciplinary audience — leading with the human-robot contribution and research questions, making hypotheses and measures explicit, describing the robot embodiment, keeping claims proportional to the study within the 8-page acmart budget, and writing so the chosen track's contribution type is unmistakable.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- iccv-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing the experimental program for an ICCV paper against the early-March deadline, covering benchmark-drift audits across the two-year gap, baseline fairness in the foundation-model era, ablations that isolate mechanisms, qualitative and failure evidence, and sequencing runs so the decisive result lands before the deadline, not after.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- corl-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing experiments for a CoRL robot-learning paper — seeds and evaluation-episode counts, task-suite breadth, real-robot versus simulation evidence, sim-to-real gap measurement, baseline fairness across BC/RL/VLA families, generalization splits, and statistics for success-rate claims.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- isca-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an ISCA paper — pinning simulator fidelity to the claims it must carry, documenting gem5-class configurations and sampling choices, selecting workload suites that represent the claim's domain, tuning baselines in good faith, and separating architectural effect from modeling artifact.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- uai-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when splitting a UAI paper between the 8-page main part, the unlimited in-PDF appendix for proofs and protocols, and the optional 50 MB supplementary ZIP, deciding what reviewers must see in the body versus what may sit in material they are not required to read, all under double-blind and single-file constraints.DocumenteFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- kdd-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when splitting a KDD paper across its 8 content pages, the optional appendix after the references, and the cited repository, under the camera-ready rule capping references plus appendix at 3 of 12 pages. Covers appendix triage, reviewer-discretion reality, and the one-page cross-cycle resubmission change summary.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- itcs-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what counts as evidence for an ITCS theory claim — proofs as the primary evidence, worked examples and separations that make a model concrete, and the rare, well-scoped illustrative computation or simulation — and how to keep any computational content checkable and subordinate to the mathematics.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- brooks-sweephyhmrright/brooks-lintFull-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants to "fix everything", "sweep the codebase", "auto-fix all issues", "clean up the whole project", or asks for a single command that both diagnoses and remediates quality problems. Do NOT trigger for: read-only audits or health reports where the user only wants findings without code changes; single-dimension reviews (use the focused skill instead: brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test); server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —
cvpr-submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
PlanificareActualizat 27 sept. 2026
De la autor
Use when auditing a CVPR submission before the OpenReview deadline, covering abstract registration and profile requirements, the 8-page limit including figures and tables, the Compute Reporting Form, anonymity and external-link bans, dual-submission attestations, reviewer-duty enrollment, and desk-reject triage.
Instalare
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cvpr-submission -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/cvpr-submission/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: MIT
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență77
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție50
Fișiere (1)
- SKILL.md