Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.492 de skill-uri din 2.391 de depozite · actualizat acum 15 ore
49.492 de skill-uri
- iclr-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing ICLR experiments, including baselines, ablations, scaling laws, robustness, statistics, benchmarks, human evaluation, and compute reporting. Use when a reviewer questions whether a representation-learning or model gain is real, when you must isolate one mechanism with an ablation, or when preparing a small compute-matched control that can be posted inline during the public discussion period.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cav-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper body versus its optional appendix and artifact, covering the LNCS page limits, the rule that reviewers are not obliged to read the appendix so decision-critical content stays in the body, where full proofs and benchmark tables live, and double-anonymous supplementary material for the anonymized categories.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cscw-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical work behind a CSCW paper — interview and ethnographic rigor, trace and log analysis, surveys, deployments, and mixed methods — matching each method's own validity standard and the ethics of studying real communities.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ndss-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an NDSS paper — attack demonstrations, defense evaluations under adaptive adversaries, and Internet measurements — choosing between testbed, emulation, and live experiments and meeting NDSS's deployment-realism evidence bar.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- edbt-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing EDBT empirical evaluations for database-systems work, covering real workloads and datasets, fair and tuned baselines, honest measurement across realistic scales, reproducible harnesses, and the higher bar of the Experiments & Analysis paper where the measurement itself is the contribution.DateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- soda-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding whether and how experiments belong in a SODA (ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms) paper — SODA's scope includes experimental validation but theorems carry the decision, so this skill designs supporting numerics honestly and routes implementation-led work to co-located ALENEX or to SEA.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- uai-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising a UAI manuscript for probabilistic-inference readers, enforcing precise notation for distributions, graphs, and interventions, explicit assumption and identifiability statements, an 8-page main part that carries the whole argument while proofs sit in the appendix, and claims calibrated to what the theory and experiments show.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- osdi-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an OSDI submission — choosing mature baselines and realistic workloads, structuring the section around research questions, measuring scalability and tail behavior, quantifying the design's costs, and fitting the evidence into the 12-page reviewed body.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- eccv-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the experimental program of an ECCV paper — benchmark selection that survives a September conference, matched-substrate baseline fairness in the foundation-model era, ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism, qualitative failure evidence, and run sequencing toward a March freeze.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- hri-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when drafting or revising an ACM/IEEE HRI full paper's structure and prose for an interdisciplinary audience — leading with the human-robot contribution and research questions, making hypotheses and measures explicit, describing the robot embodiment, keeping claims proportional to the study within the 8-page acmart budget, and writing so the chosen track's contribution type is unmistakable.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- iccv-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing the experimental program for an ICCV paper against the early-March deadline, covering benchmark-drift audits across the two-year gap, baseline fairness in the foundation-model era, ablations that isolate mechanisms, qualitative and failure evidence, and sequencing runs so the decisive result lands before the deadline, not after.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- corl-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing experiments for a CoRL robot-learning paper — seeds and evaluation-episode counts, task-suite breadth, real-robot versus simulation evidence, sim-to-real gap measurement, baseline fairness across BC/RL/VLA families, generalization splits, and statistics for success-rate claims.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- uai-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when converting an accepted UAI paper into its PMLR proceedings version, covering de-anonymization, final formatting against the UAI template, metadata for the PMLR volume, restoring public code and data links, poster and spotlight preparation for the conference, and sequencing work back from the camera-ready deadline.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- atc-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in the ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) two-page extended abstract, the 12-page paper body, the optional appendix, and the artifact — splitting content by review round and decision-criticality so nothing that decides acceptance lives where a reviewer is not required to read.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vis-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing an accepted IEEE VIS paper for its IEEE TVCG camera-ready, covering de-anonymization, the VGTC/TVCG template and journal metadata (DOI, ORCID, IEEE keywords/index terms), integrating the second-round required changes without scope creep, permanentizing open-materials links, the Open Practices disclosure form, and the Graphics Replicability Stamp handoff.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- wsdm-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a WSDM submission before the August deadlines - EasyChair setup, the abstract-then-paper week, the appendix-inclusive page budget, the required ethical-considerations section, anonymization that survives Associate-Chair metadata visibility, and desk-reject exposure at a no-rebuttal venue.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- podc-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an ACM PODC submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the two-step abstract-registration then full-paper deadline, the ACM Master template with the 10-page-merits budget and unbounded full version, lightweight double-blind anonymization, the regular-paper-vs-Brief-Announcement choice, and desk-risk triage before the AoE cutoff.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- sosp-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a SOSP submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the abstract-registration and full-paper deadlines, the 12-page technical-content limit with references excluded, the 7x9-inch two-column format, double-blind rules with paper-ID substitution, conflict declaration under PC-chair audit, and desk-reject triage.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- sci-abstractbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when writing the two front-matter artifacts Science (AAAS) demands — the one-sentence summary for the table of contents and the ≤125-word single-paragraph abstract — both readable by any scientist and both leading with the quantified advance rather than the method. Late-stage polish skill for the flagship AAAS weekly.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ndss-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when performing the final pre-upload audit of an NDSS submission — HotCRP fields, the AoE deadline, NDSS template and 13-page compliance, double-blind sweep, ethics readiness, the six-per-author cap, overlap rules, and desk-reject triage in the last week.JuridicFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- kdd-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing an accepted KDD paper for ACM proceedings, covering the 12-page proceedings budget with 9 content pages, the extra content page over the submission, the 3-page cap on references plus appendix, ACM e-rights and TAPS source processing, ACM Open APC status, de-anonymization, and Digital Library metadata for SIGKDD.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- fse-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning an ESEC/FSE submission against the software-engineering literature across ICSE, FSE, ASE, ISSTA, MSR, and the SE journals (EMSE, TSE, TOSEM), writing delta-first contrast rather than a citation catalog, keeping self-citations double-anonymous, and handling concurrent, preprint, and prior-version overlap.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- icdm-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an ICDM (IEEE International Conference on Data Mining) submission for readiness, covering Research-vs-Applied track choice and its anonymity regime, the triple-blind sweep, the 10-page IEEE all-inclusive cap, the single June deadline, in-paper artifact references, and the desk-level triggers that get an ICDM paper rejected without review.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- atc-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when writing or auditing the related-work and positioning of an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — covering the systems literature lanes, positioning against OSDI/SOSP/NSDI/EuroSys/FAST, writing delta-first comparisons, and keeping self-citation double-blind.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
review
hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins
InginerieActualizat ieri
De la autor
Use before merge, after subagents, or for spec/plan review.
Instalare
npx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill review -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/review/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: APACHE-2.0
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență78
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție51
Fișiere (1)
- SKILL.md