Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.492 de skill-uri din 2.391 de depozite · actualizat acum 15 ore
49.492 de skill-uri
- wsdm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a WSDM paper - offline ranking and recommendation metrics with bias controls, temporal-split protocols for interaction logs, baseline selection from recent WSDM/SIGIR/KDD editions, ablations that isolate the mechanism, efficiency reporting, and online-evidence framing.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- aaai-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- aaai-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- wacv-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing WACV experiments, covering Applications-track systems evidence (latency, power, robustness under real constraints) versus Algorithms-track matched-baseline novelty, comparative assessment under the deployed condition, uncertainty over seeds and sessions, ablations, and evidence that survives the two-round review.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vldb-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a VLDB paper, covering workload and dataset realism at scale, competitor tuning fairness, scalability curves versus single points, tail-latency and throughput reporting, ablations that isolate the mechanism, and the loss-case disclosure PVLDB reviewers look for first.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vis-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising an IEEE VIS paper for a task-grounded visualization contribution on the first page, a design rationale that ties each visual encoding and interaction to a task, evaluation matched to the contribution type, honest limitations, and disciplined use of the VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget for a paper that will be read as an IEEE TVCG journal article.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ase-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research submission is evaluated, covering double-anonymous review, the early-rejection stage before rebuttal, the Accept / Revision / Reject outcomes, the criteria-bound revision round, and how ASE's process differs from FSE's PACMSE Major Revision, ICSE's cycles, and ISSTA's rounds.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cav-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) submission is evaluated, covering the two-stage reviewing process (two reviews then an early-reject filter, then two more reviews with a rebuttal), the partial double-anonymity by category, the accept/reject outcome, the optional non-conditional artifact evaluation, and how CAV differs from TACAS and FMCAD.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- atc-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) submission is evaluated — the two-round extended-abstract model, the round-one gate by two reviewers, the round-two read by 3-4 reviewers, double-blind reviewing, rebuttal, conditional acceptance with shepherding, and how ATC differs from OSDI/SOSP/NSDI.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- asplos-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ASPLOS campaign across the two-deadline cycle — sequencing evidence building, the September 9, 2026 submission gate, author-response windows, the December 21 notification, Major Revision resubmission six weeks later, artifact evaluation, and the April 2027 conference in Crete, with owners per risk.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cikm-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when turning an accepted CIKM paper into its ACM proceedings version inside the short notification-to-camera-ready window, covering de-anonymization, the e-rights and TAPS pipeline into the ACM Digital Library, CCS concepts and metadata, GenAI-disclosure retention, artifact link publication, and Rome presentation logistics.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cell-star-methodsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to build Cell's mandatory STAR Methods — the Key Resources Table, the three Resource Availability subsections, Experimental Model and Subject Details, Method Details, and Quantification and Statistical Analysis, in the exact required order.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- planning-with-filesOthmanAdi/planning-with-filesPersistent file-based planning for multi-step AI-agent work. Keeps task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md on disk; lifecycle hooks inject selected project planning context. Automatic recovery reads project planning files only. Explicit session-catchup.py --metadata reads same-project local agent session records and emits aggregate counts only; --replay may emit bounded nonce-framed excerpts. Optional gated mode can request continuation only when the host supports it and never runs commands declared in Markdown. The skill has no network upload path. Use for research or work needing 5+ tool calls.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 27,9 K↓ —
- reading-livekit-docsfcakyon/claude-codex-settingsLooks up current LiveKit facts (API signatures, CLI flags, config options, model and provider support, SDK changelogs, pricing) from the docs instead of answering from memory. Use whenever a question touches LiveKit specifics: "does LiveKit support X", "what changed in agents 1.8", "what are the arguments to Y", "how much does LiveKit cost", "find an example of Z in the LiveKit repos", or before writing any LiveKit code. Other LiveKit skills load this one first. Covers the LiveKit Docs MCP server and the `lk docs` CLI.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,2 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
- clerahashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsConnect the user's AI client to the Clera MCP server and hire through it: search vetted startup candidates, screen them against a role, and request intros. Also covers the candidate side.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- analyze-performance-diagnosegooseworks-ai/goose-skillsStep of the analyze-performance playbook: flags tracking breaks with fixes and explains each big metric move with evidence, confidence and ruled-out causes. Run analyze-performance instead; not for direct use.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- work-with-creators-creator-vettinggooseworks-ai/goose-skillsVets creators you have already named from their public pages. Covers the median views of their last 12 to 20 posts (sponsored and organic apart), a read of their comments, how often they post, audience fit with how sure it is, about 12 months of brand-safety checks, rival partnerships and rules for regulated categories. Gives a verdict with dated numbers for each one. Use alone when you already have the creator handles and the brand's goal; otherwise run work-with-creators.JuridicFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- email-lifecycle-offer-mathgooseworks-ai/goose-skillsPrices one discount, free-shipping threshold or referral reward against contribution margin: cost per order, share of margin used, break-even lift, code leakage risks, and one recommended offer in two plain sentences. Use alone when you already have the offer, average order value and margin per product; otherwise run email-lifecycle.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- comprehensive-analysishuytieu/COG-second-brainDeep-dive 7-day analysis across all data sources for weekly reviews, board prep, and strategic planningPlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- testing-livekit-agentsfcakyon/claude-codex-settingsWrites turn-level tests for a LiveKit agent in the user's normal test suite: pytest (Python) or Vitest (Node.js). Use when the user asks to "write tests for my agent", "add a test for this tool", "test the handoff", "pin this bug", "why does my agent test fail", or after building or changing agent behavior that needs regression coverage. Covers the SDK's test session harness, assertions on messages, tool calls and handoffs, LLM judging of a reply against an intent, mocking tools, multi-turn tests, and judging whole conversations with the built-in judges. For interactive poking use debugging-livekit-agents. For grading whole conversations at scale use running-livekit-simulations.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,2 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
- oma-voicefirst-fluke/oh-my-agentGenerate or transcribe speech with Voicebox or VoiceStudio, or process existing audio locally. Use for narration, transcripts, timed speech, and loudness conversion; video editing uses oma-video.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- commithashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsGenerate a Conventional Commits message, commit, and optionally push to remote.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- hyperframes-cliActualizatheygen-com/hyperframesThe HyperFrames CLI by job - scaffold, check, look at frames, edit the timeline, preview, render locally or in the cloud, publish, project history - plus reading its JSON and recovering from build or render failures.OficialInginerieVerifică întâi★ 78,7 K↓ —
- worktreehashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsUse for non-trivial or parallel work that should happen in a separate git worktree.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
md-review
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
InginerieActualizat alaltăieri
De la autor
Use when converting a markdown code review with diff blocks and severity callouts into a two-column HTML review. Parses diffs with diff_parser.py and annotations with annotation_extractor.py; requires a named reviewer.
Instalare
npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill md-review -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/md-review/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Rulează scripturile incluseNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: MIT
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
- Include scripturi pe care nu le-am verificatScăzut
De ce 88
Securitate85
Proveniență94
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție69
Fișiere (8)
- SKILL.md
- assets/md_review_template.html
- references/diff_rendering_canon.md
- references/pr_annotation_ux.md
- references/severity_coding.md
- scripts/annotation_extractor.py
- scripts/diff_parser.py
- scripts/review_html_renderer.py