Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.492 de skill-uri din 2.391 de depozite · actualizat acum 15 ore
49.492 de skill-uri
- aeofcakyon/claude-codex-settingsThis skill should be used when the user asks to "build an AEO strategy", "improve AI search visibility", "track buyer prompts", "analyze AI citations", or "plan content for answer engines". Apply an evidence-led answer engine optimization (AEO/GEO) feedback loop to any product or service, prioritizing discovery by buyers who have not heard of it.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,2 K↓ —
- setupfcakyon/claude-codex-settingsThis skill should be used when user encounters "Azure MCP error", "Azure authentication failed", "az login required", "Azure CLI not found", or needs help configuring Azure MCP integration.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,2 K↓ —
- health-checkhoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-MonitorRun comprehensive health checks on the Claude Code Agent Monitor system. Validates dashboard API, database, WebSocket, hooks, and disk usage. Use to verify the monitoring setup is working correctly.DateFără avertismente★ 1,1 K↓ —
- gentle-ai-skill-registryGentleman-Programming/gentle-shellTrigger: update skills, skill registry, actualizar skills, after skill changes. Index available skills by trigger and path.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —
- metronomefcakyon/claude-codex-settingsGuides Metronome usage-based billing integration decisions — event ingestion (single and batch, idempotency, billable metrics), contract design (rate cards, overrides, dimensional pricing, products), invoicing lifecycle (grace periods, finalization, Stripe sync), credit and commit management (prepaid, postpaid, thresholds, auto-recharge), and Stripe integration (arrears invoicing, tax providers, line item limits). Use when building, modifying, or reviewing any Metronome integration — including ingesting usage events, creating customers, contracts, or rate cards, designing billable metric group keys, managing credits and commits, configuring invoicing, syncing invoices with Stripe Billing, billing AI applications for token usage, setting up self-serve (PLG) pricing, reviewing customer health, commit burn, portfolios, or renewals, or migrating from Stripe Billing Meters to Metronome.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,2 K↓ —
- verify-paginationreticlehq/reticleProve the next page of a list, or the next batch of an infinite scroll, loads NEW rows from the server, repeats none, and that the end of the list is handled. Use when pagination or infinite scroll was added or changed, when a list shows the same rows twice or skips some, or when the last page still offers a next control.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- email-lifecyclegooseworks-ai/goose-skillsLifecycle email, SMS and push: audits the list and deliverability, then writes the flows this kind of business needs first, loadable as-is in your own tool, plus segments, cadence and this week's broadcasts. Never sends anything. Use when: set up my welcome and abandoned-cart emails; trial onboarding or waitlist launch emails; win back lapsed customers; plan this week's emails and texts; push notifications for my app; why are my emails going to spam; plan our Black Friday email and SMS sends; a send went wrong. Not for cold outreach to prospects — use write-outreach; not the editorial newsletter issue — use make-content; not the whole cross-channel Black Friday plan — use plan-campaign.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- brooks-audithyhmrright/brooks-lintArchitecture audit that maps module dependencies, checks layering integrity, and flags structural decay across a codebase, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to audit architecture, review folder/module structure, check for circular imports, understand how the codebase is organized, or asks "does this follow clean architecture?" or "why does everything depend on everything?". Also triggers for onboarding requests: "explain this codebase to a new developer" or "give me a codebase tour" (use onboarding mode). Do NOT trigger for: PR-level code review (use brooks-review) or line-level refactoring questions — this skill analyzes structural/module-level concerns, not individual functions.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —
- verify-unattendedreticlehq/reticleInstall, instrument and verify a web app end to end without pausing for a human. Use in an autonomous or goal-mode agent, in CI, or in any client that asks for approval on every command: it never says "restart your client" or "open a browser", because it takes a route that needs neither. Prefer the normal reticle skill when a human is present and can answer.BrowserFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- replay-user-flowsreticlehq/reticleTurn a user journey you just clicked through into a saved regression check that re-runs deterministically, with no model in the loop and no test code to write. Use when you have driven the same flow twice, when the user wants regression coverage without a Playwright suite, when a refactor needs proving against every existing journey, or when re-verifying by hand is costing a full drive every time.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- benchmarkhoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-MonitorBenchmark one session (or a small recent set) against the rolling average using Agent Monitor data — cost, total tokens, tool count, and workflow complexity score — and report where each metric lands as a percentile of the population. Tells you whether a session was normal, cheap, or an outlier. Use when judging whether a session was typical or out of band.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,1 K↓ —
- brooks-testhyhmrright/brooks-lintTest quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow execution, poor readability. Triggers when: user asks about test quality, shares test files for review, or expresses frustration: "tests keep breaking whenever I change anything", "our tests take forever", "tests pass but bugs still reach production", or "we have too many mocks". Do NOT trigger for: writing new tests from scratch (use the regular test-writing workflow) or testing framework/syntax questions — this skill reviews an existing suite for structural quality problems, not individual test authoring.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —
- brooks-debthyhmrright/brooks-lintTech debt assessment that identifies, classifies, and prioritizes maintainability problems — helping teams build a refactoring roadmap — drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks about tech debt, refactoring priorities, what to clean up first, or asks "why is this so hard to change?", "what should we fix first?", or "how do I justify refactoring to management?". Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime — "health" in those contexts is infrastructure, not code quality. Also not for single-function refactoring questions.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —
- brooks-reviewhyhmrright/brooks-lintPR code review that surfaces decay risks, design smells, and maintainability issues with concrete Symptom → Source → Consequence → Remedy findings, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to review code, check a PR, shares a diff or pastes code asking "does this look right?" / "any issues here?" / "ready to merge?", or asks for feedback on a function, class, or file. Also triggers when user mentions: code smells / refactoring / clean architecture / DDD / SOLID principles / Hyrum's Law / deep modules / tactical programming / conceptual integrity / Brooks's Law / Mythical Man-Month / second system effect. Do NOT trigger for: questions about how to write code from scratch, language syntax questions, or framework/tool questions where no existing code is shared.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —
- ipsn-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an IPSN-lineage project timeline from track/venue selection through the CPS-IoT Week deadline, double-blind submission, deployment and hardware logistics, rebuttal, the Best Research Artifact Award, and the dual ACM/IEEE camera-ready — with honest handling of the fact that IPSN merged into SenSys.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- false-green-testsreticlehq/reticleFind out why the tests pass but the app is broken. Catches false greens: a green suite over a feature that does not work, a mocked API standing in for a real one, an assertion that holds no matter what the app does, a click handler wired to nothing. Use when the suite is green and the user says it is broken, when a test never fails, when coverage looks fine but bugs still ship, or before trusting a passing run you did not watch.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- icdt-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) campaign end to end, running the two-submission-cycle calendar backward from a chosen cycle deadline through abstract registration, the first-cycle revision round, LIPIcs camera-ready, and presentation at the co-located EDBT/ICDT event.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- second-brain-changed-my-mindundefined-ui/second-brain-osTrace where the user's recorded position on something has shifted: superseded claims, contradictions between sources of different dates, and what evidence moved them. Use this skill when the user asks what they have changed their mind about, how their thinking on a topic developed, what they used to believe, or wants a quarterly look back at their own positions. Do NOT use for finding contradictions between sources with no time dimension, or for a current-state answer.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- fix-what-i-pointed-atreticlehq/reticlePick up the bugs a human flagged by pointing at them in the running app, each arriving with the element, the note they typed, and the source file and line. Use when the user says they marked or flagged something, when starting a session on an app someone has been clicking through, when a designer or PM has left feedback in the UI, or when the user describes a problem as "that button there" without saying which file.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- establishing-project-contextGanyuanRan/AegisUse when the user asks to establish shared project language, or project work exposes a conflicting, renamed, or deprecated domain term that needs active semantic modeling. Routine small tasks stay on the fast path.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- icdm-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ICDM (IEEE International Conference on Data Mining) project timeline from venue fit through the abstract and full-paper deadlines, the long summer wait to the August notification, the no-rebuttal review, the possible short-paper acceptance branch, IEEE camera-ready, and in-person presentation on a single annual deadline.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- icde-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an IEEE ICDE project timeline around the two-round-per-edition calendar, choosing between the June and November research deadlines, budgeting for a possible revise-and-resubmit window, and backward-planning a data-engineering systems paper from CMT submission through review, camera-ready, and IEEE Xplore publication.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- gate-checkundefined-ui/second-brain-osFind the decisions in a pipeline that do not need the expensive model and propose the gate for each: a rule, a classic classifier, or a small model, with fail-closed routing. Use when the user asks to cut model costs or latency, says the big model handles everything, or wants a triage / routing / filter layer in front of an agent. Analysis plus an optional baseline scaffold. Do NOT use for auditing context layout (context-audit) or for building eval suites (evals-bootstrap).ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- context-auditundefined-ui/second-brain-osAudit an agent's context layout against the four places: system prompt, tools, history, tail. Use when the user asks to audit, review or fix their agent's context, prompt caching, token spend per turn, or CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md layout. Read-only: reports findings and a fix list, changes nothing. Do NOT use for writing evals (evals-bootstrap) or for loop design (goal-test).ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
quick-stats
hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor
ProductivitateActualizat ieri
De la autor
One-line summary of key Agent Monitor metrics — active sessions, total cost from the pricing engine, events today from daily_events, top tool from tool_usage, and current model from the most recent session. Use for a fast at-a-glance check without leaving the terminal.
Instalare
npx skills add hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor --skill quick-stats -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/quick-stats/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: MIT
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență77
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție49
Fișiere (2)
- SKILL.md
- agents/openai.yaml