Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.492 de skill-uri din 2.391 de depozite · actualizat acum 14 ore
49.492 de skill-uri
- cav-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper body versus its optional appendix and artifact, covering the LNCS page limits, the rule that reviewers are not obliged to read the appendix so decision-critical content stays in the body, where full proofs and benchmark tables live, and double-anonymous supplementary material for the anonymized categories.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cscw-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical work behind a CSCW paper — interview and ethnographic rigor, trace and log analysis, surveys, deployments, and mixed methods — matching each method's own validity standard and the ethics of studying real communities.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ndss-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an NDSS paper — attack demonstrations, defense evaluations under adaptive adversaries, and Internet measurements — choosing between testbed, emulation, and live experiments and meeting NDSS's deployment-realism evidence bar.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- edbt-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing EDBT empirical evaluations for database-systems work, covering real workloads and datasets, fair and tuned baselines, honest measurement across realistic scales, reproducible harnesses, and the higher bar of the Experiments & Analysis paper where the measurement itself is the contribution.DateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- soda-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding whether and how experiments belong in a SODA (ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms) paper — SODA's scope includes experimental validation but theorems carry the decision, so this skill designs supporting numerics honestly and routes implementation-led work to co-located ALENEX or to SEA.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- uai-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising a UAI manuscript for probabilistic-inference readers, enforcing precise notation for distributions, graphs, and interventions, explicit assumption and identifiability statements, an 8-page main part that carries the whole argument while proofs sit in the appendix, and claims calibrated to what the theory and experiments show.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- osdi-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an OSDI submission — choosing mature baselines and realistic workloads, structuring the section around research questions, measuring scalability and tail behavior, quantifying the design's costs, and fitting the evidence into the 12-page reviewed body.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- eccv-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the experimental program of an ECCV paper — benchmark selection that survives a September conference, matched-substrate baseline fairness in the foundation-model era, ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism, qualitative failure evidence, and run sequencing toward a March freeze.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- hri-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when drafting or revising an ACM/IEEE HRI full paper's structure and prose for an interdisciplinary audience — leading with the human-robot contribution and research questions, making hypotheses and measures explicit, describing the robot embodiment, keeping claims proportional to the study within the 8-page acmart budget, and writing so the chosen track's contribution type is unmistakable.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- iccv-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing the experimental program for an ICCV paper against the early-March deadline, covering benchmark-drift audits across the two-year gap, baseline fairness in the foundation-model era, ablations that isolate mechanisms, qualitative and failure evidence, and sequencing runs so the decisive result lands before the deadline, not after.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- corl-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing experiments for a CoRL robot-learning paper — seeds and evaluation-episode counts, task-suite breadth, real-robot versus simulation evidence, sim-to-real gap measurement, baseline fairness across BC/RL/VLA families, generalization splits, and statistics for success-rate claims.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- isca-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an ISCA paper — pinning simulator fidelity to the claims it must carry, documenting gem5-class configurations and sampling choices, selecting workload suites that represent the claim's domain, tuning baselines in good faith, and separating architectural effect from modeling artifact.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- uai-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when splitting a UAI paper between the 8-page main part, the unlimited in-PDF appendix for proofs and protocols, and the optional 50 MB supplementary ZIP, deciding what reviewers must see in the body versus what may sit in material they are not required to read, all under double-blind and single-file constraints.DocumenteFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- kdd-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when splitting a KDD paper across its 8 content pages, the optional appendix after the references, and the cited repository, under the camera-ready rule capping references plus appendix at 3 of 12 pages. Covers appendix triage, reviewer-discretion reality, and the one-page cross-cycle resubmission change summary.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- itcs-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what counts as evidence for an ITCS theory claim — proofs as the primary evidence, worked examples and separations that make a model concrete, and the rare, well-scoped illustrative computation or simulation — and how to keep any computational content checkable and subordinate to the mathematics.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- nsdi-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an NSDI submission — choosing traces, testbeds, and deployment evidence, sizing scale and failure-injection experiments, picking baselines that fight back, and reporting tail behavior so networked-systems reviewers can see where the design wins, loses, and breaks.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- fse-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising an ESEC/FSE paper for a practitioner-grounded software-engineering contribution on the first page, research-question contracts, a threats-to-validity section that argues rather than recites, evidence proportional to the claim, double-anonymous wording, and disciplined use of the ACM-template page budget.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- uai-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when converting an accepted UAI paper into its PMLR proceedings version, covering de-anonymization, final formatting against the UAI template, metadata for the PMLR volume, restoring public code and data links, poster and spotlight preparation for the conference, and sequencing work back from the camera-ready deadline.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- atc-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in the ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) two-page extended abstract, the 12-page paper body, the optional appendix, and the artifact — splitting content by review round and decision-criticality so nothing that decides acceptance lives where a reviewer is not required to read.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vis-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing an accepted IEEE VIS paper for its IEEE TVCG camera-ready, covering de-anonymization, the VGTC/TVCG template and journal metadata (DOI, ORCID, IEEE keywords/index terms), integrating the second-round required changes without scope creep, permanentizing open-materials links, the Open Practices disclosure form, and the Graphics Replicability Stamp handoff.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- wsdm-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a WSDM submission before the August deadlines - EasyChair setup, the abstract-then-paper week, the appendix-inclusive page budget, the required ethical-considerations section, anonymization that survives Associate-Chair metadata visibility, and desk-reject exposure at a no-rebuttal venue.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- podc-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an ACM PODC submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the two-step abstract-registration then full-paper deadline, the ACM Master template with the 10-page-merits budget and unbounded full version, lightweight double-blind anonymization, the regular-paper-vs-Brief-Announcement choice, and desk-risk triage before the AoE cutoff.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- sosp-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a SOSP submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the abstract-registration and full-paper deadlines, the 12-page technical-content limit with references excluded, the 7x9-inch two-column format, double-blind rules with paper-ID substitution, conflict declaration under PC-chair audit, and desk-reject triage.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- sci-abstractbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when writing the two front-matter artifacts Science (AAAS) demands — the one-sentence summary for the table of contents and the ≤125-word single-paragraph abstract — both readable by any scientist and both leading with the quantified advance rather than the method. Late-stage polish skill for the flagship AAAS weekly.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
dossier
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
TestareActualizat alaltăieri
De la autor
Use for diligence or meeting prep on a specific company, person or organization ('prep me for a meeting with X', 'due diligence on Y'). Tests the user's stated hypothesis with balanced evidence (disconfirming_evidence_balance.py) and writes a .docx dossier.
Instalare
npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill dossier -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/dossier/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Rulează scripturile incluseFolosește rețeauaLicență: MIT
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
- Include scripturi pe care nu le-am verificatScăzut
De ce 88
Securitate85
Proveniență94
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție69
Fișiere (7)
- SKILL.md
- references/conversation_hook_quality.md
- references/hypothesis_testing_discipline.md
- references/subject_type_source_matrix.md
- scripts/citation_tracker.py
- scripts/disconfirming_evidence_balance.py
- scripts/source_tier_classifier.py