Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.492 de skill-uri din 2.391 de depozite · actualizat acum 14 ore
49.492 de skill-uri
- minutes-recapsilverstein/minutesGenerate a daily digest of today's policy-authorized meetings and voice memos — key decisions, action items, and themes across available recordings. Use when the user asks "recap my day", "what happened in my meetings today", "daily summary", "what did I discuss today", "any action items from today", or wants a consolidated view of the day's conversations.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
- quiz-generatormohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsGenerate a quiz or test on any topic with a balanced mix of question types and difficulty, plus a complete answer key with explanations. Use when asked to create a quiz, write a test, make practice questions, or build an assessment. Produces well-formed questions aligned to learning objectives, tagged by difficulty and cognitive level, with an answer key and (for MCQs) plausible distractors and rationale.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- security-auditcloudflare/security-audit-skillSecurity guidance and vulnerability review for codebases, APIs, services, CLI tools, libraries, and daemons. Use for security questions, focused reviews, vulnerability research, security audits, or pen tests. Run the complete workflow only for explicit codebase audit or pen-test requests, full/comprehensive/end-to-end reviews, or requested report artifacts.OficialSecuritateFără avertismente★ 58,6 K↓ —
- pods-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the analytical "evidence" of an ACM PODS paper — worst-case and average-case analyses, matching upper and lower bounds, dichotomy completeness, correct complexity assumptions, and the occasional empirical validation when a theory paper claims practicality — matching the rigor to the shape of each theoretical claim.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- writing-guidelinesvercel-labs/agent-skillsReview docs/prose for Writing Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my docs", "check writing style", "audit prose", "review docs voice and tone", or "check this page against the writing handbook".OficialRedactareFără avertismente★ 33,5 K↓ —
- stoc-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when judging whether computation belongs in a STOC (ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing) paper at all — STOC accepts on theorems, with no empirical-evaluation expectation — and when it does, scoping it as certified proof computation, constructive search, or clearly labeled illustration rather than benchmarking.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- minutes-searchsilverstein/minutesSearch past meeting transcripts and voice memos for specific topics, people, decisions, or ideas. Use this whenever the user asks "what did we discuss about X", "find that meeting where we talked about Y", "what did Alex say", "did we decide on", "what was that idea about", or any question that could be answered by searching their meeting history. Also use for "do I have any notes about" or "check my meetings for".PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
- minutes-copilotsilverstein/minutesStart and control Minutes Coach, the separate real-time copilot HUD, with an explicit meeting goal. Use only for explicit Coach or HUD lifecycle requests such as "start Minutes Coach", "open the Coach HUD", "pause Minutes Coach", "resume Minutes Coach", "Minutes Coach status", or "stop Minutes Coach". Do not use for requests that explicitly ask the current terminal agent to watch or strategize; those belong to minutes-live-sidekick. An ambiguous request such as "coach me live" requires one short surface clarification and must not automatically start Coach.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
- refactoring-guruciembor/agent-rules-booksApply Refactoring.Guru-inspired rules when diagnosing code smells, choosing refactoring techniques, and stopping cleanup before uncontrolled redesign.InginerieFără avertismente★ 3,2 K↓ —
- run-paid-campaigns-weekly-readgooseworks-ai/goose-skillsStep of the run-paid-campaigns playbook: reads each platform's last mature results window against the allowable cost, as evidence for the week's moves. Run run-paid-campaigns instead; not for direct use.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- clone-briefmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsSend your position to a meeting instead of your body — a one-page brief carrying your stances, fallbacks, red lines, tradables, and delegation limits, readable by the colleague (or agent) representing you. Use when you can't attend a decision-making meeting, when double-booked, when briefing someone to negotiate for you, or 'what would you need from me to represent me?'. Produces the clone brief plus a 60-second verbal version for the person carrying it.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- minutes-weeklysilverstein/minutesWeekly meeting synthesis — themes, decision arcs, stale commitments, and what deserves your attention next week. Use when the user says "weekly review", "what happened this week", "weekly summary", "recap my week", "any outstanding items", "week in review", or at the end of a work week.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
- receipts-auditmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsAudit any document against its own sources — every factual claim extracted and graded as evidenced, partially evidenced, unsupported, or contradicted, with the exact source line that supports or fails it. Use when asked to fact-check a document against its sources, check whether a report's claims are backed up, verify a deck against the data, or ask 'does this doc have receipts?'. Produces a claim ledger, unsupported claims ranked by load-bearingness, a fix-or-drop call per claim, and an honesty score with stated method.DocumenteFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- the-strong-nomohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsFind the real reason to NOT do the exciting thing you're about to commit to — the honest case against, before the excitement carries you in. Use when asked talk me out of this, should I really do this, what's the case against, or I'm excited but is this a mistake. Produces the strongest honest argument for not doing it, the excitement biases clouding your judgment, the specific conditions under which this is a bad idea for you, and a clear read on whether the strong no actually wins — protecting you from the plans that feel great and end badly.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- aaai-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- planning-with-filesOthmanAdi/planning-with-filesPersistent file-based planning for multi-step AI-agent work. Keeps task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md on disk; lifecycle hooks inject selected project planning context. Automatic recovery reads project planning files only. Explicit session-catchup.py --metadata reads same-project local agent session records and emits aggregate counts only; --replay may emit bounded nonce-framed excerpts. Optional gated mode can request continuation only when the host supports it and never runs commands declared in Markdown. The skill has no network upload path. Use for research or work needing 5+ tool calls.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 27,9 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
- vis-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in an IEEE VIS paper body versus its supplemental materials, covering the VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget, the supplemental video that VIS reviewers routinely watch, the one-week supplemental deadline extension, double-blind supplemental anonymization, and how to split a visualization paper between the reviewed pages and the archive.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pldi-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing a PLDI evaluation — choosing defensible benchmark suites and baseline compiler configurations, measuring runtime, compile time, and memory with warmup and variance discipline, running ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism, and scoping claims to the platforms measured.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- asplos-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ASPLOS campaign across the two-deadline cycle — sequencing evidence building, the September 9, 2026 submission gate, author-response windows, the December 21 notification, Major Revision resubmission six weeks later, artifact evaluation, and the April 2027 conference in Crete, with owners per risk.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- fixing-flaky-testsamplifthq/openmeldGuides an agent through reproducing, root-causing, fixing, and validating flaky tests in the PostHog monorepo. Use when a test fails intermittently in CI but passes on rerun or locally, when `hogli ci:insights` or the debugging-ci-failures skill classifies a failure as a flaky test, when given a GitHub Actions URL for a flaky job, when asked to check Trunk Flaky Tests for a test, PR, or master, or when asked to deflake, stabilize, or fix a flaky Jest, pytest, or Playwright test. Core discipline: reproduce locally before changing anything, fix the root cause (never mask it with sleeps, retries, or bigger timeouts), and prove the fix with an N-run validation loop sized to the observed failure rate. Stabilizing is not the only valid outcome — the skill also gates whether the test should exist, so deleting a test that catches nothing real, or re-leveling one that flakes because of the level it runs at, are first-class endings.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- debughashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsUse for bugs, unexpected behavior, regressions, or failing tests you did not write.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- the-pragmatic-programmerciembor/agent-rules-booksApply Hunt and Thomas-inspired pragmatic programming rules when improving engineering judgment, feedback loops, DRY knowledge, orthogonality, automation, or adaptability.AlteleFără avertismente★ 3,2 K↓ —
- brainstormhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsExplore ideas, compare approaches, and produce a validated spec before planning. Use when the user describes what to build, asks how to approach something, proposes a new feature or design change, or needs to explore options before implementation.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- minutes-video-reviewsilverstein/minutesAnalyze a product walkthrough, bug report video, Loom, or ScreenPal using Minutes transcription plus visual review. Use when the user wants a recorded demo or bug clip turned into a durable brief with transcript, key frames, issues, and next steps.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
refactor
hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins
InginerieActualizat ieri
De la autor
Restructure or clean up code with no behavior change, proved by before-and-after checks. Use when: asked to clean up, extract, dedupe or simplify, even one function.
Instalare
npx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill refactor -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/refactor/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: APACHE-2.0
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență78
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție51
Fișiere (2)
- SKILL.md
- references/behavior-preserving-simplification.md