Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.492 de skill-uri din 2.391 de depozite · actualizat acum 13 ore
49.492 de skill-uri
- hri-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when writing or auditing the related-work and positioning of an ACM/IEEE HRI full paper — covering HRI's crossing literatures (robotics, HCI, psychology, design), writing a delta-first argument that credits each community, and keeping self-citation compatible with double-blind review.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- hpca-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an HPCA submission for the two-step July gate on HotCRP, the 11-page main-body limit, the IEEE template, double-blind anonymity plus the all-authors reference rule, the AI-use disclosure, artifact-link scrubbing, and final-week sequencing before the paper deadline.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- icalp-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ICALP (EATCS) campaign backward from its single annual February deadline, through abstract registration, the anonymous submission, the Track B rebuttal window, the April notification, and the LIPIcs camera-ready and presentation, and when coordinating a full-version (arXiv/ECCC) release alongside the anonymous submission.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- iccv-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an ICCV submission in the weeks before the early-March deadline, covering OpenReview registration and profile completeness, the single same-day paper-plus-supplement upload, the 8-page inclusive format, the 25-submissions-per-author cap, every-author reviewer enrollment, anonymity and media-embargo rules, and desk-reject triage.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- icde-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an IEEE ICDE research-track submission for round choice, Microsoft CMT setup, conflict declarations, the IEEE 12-page format, single-blind requirements, supplemental-material availability, the June/November two-round calendar, desk-reject triggers, and final-week sequencing for a data-engineering systems paper.DateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- hri-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing the camera-ready of an accepted ACM/IEEE HRI paper — de-anonymizing systematically, completing ACM+IEEE dual-publication metadata (CCS concepts, ORCID, rights/eRights form), delivering every rebuttal promise within the 8-page budget, finalizing the video and de-anonymized archive, and passing production checks.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- one-pagermohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsDistil anything — a startup, product, project, or idea — into a single persuasive page. Use when asked to make a one-pager, a one-page summary, a leave-behind, a startup/product one-sheet, or a tl;dr brief. Produces a structured single page — headline + tagline, the problem, the solution, why-now/proof, and a clear ask/CTA — designed to be skimmed and remembered, ready to export as a typeset PDF.DocumenteFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- icra-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an ICRA paper for upload — PaperPlaza account and metadata, the 6-page-plus-2-reference-page limit, IEEE two-column template compliance, the double-anonymous rule introduced in the 2026 cycle, video-attachment specs (180 s, 20 MB), dual-submission conflicts with RA-L, and return-without-review triggers.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- icse-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an ICSE research-track submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the mandatory abstract deadline, the 10-page-plus-2-reference-page IEEE format, double-anonymous rules, the open-science Data Availability section, supplementary uploads, and desk-reject triage before the AoE cutoff.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- imc-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when writing or auditing the related-work and positioning of an ACM IMC paper, covering the measurement literature lanes, positioning against prior datasets and vantage points, delta-first framing, citing the datasets and tools you build on, distinguishing IMC from SIGCOMM/NSDI/PAM prior art, and keeping self-citations double-blind.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- icsme-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an IEEE ICSME project timeline from venue and track choice through abstract registration, paper submission, the early-decision cut and author-response rebuttal, notification, IEEE Xplore camera-ready, the ROSE-Festival artifact evaluation, and presentation, with backward-planning offsets for a maintenance/evolution paper and honest handling of the single-annual-round calendar.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ijcai-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an IJCAI or IJCAI-ECAI project timeline from venue fit through abstract registration, full-paper upload, author information, PPI payment, summary-reject risk, author response, notification, camera-ready, in-person presentation, and artifact release.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- iclr-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an ICLR main-conference submission for OpenReview readiness, double-blind anonymity, page limits, reciprocal reviewing, LLM-use disclosure, dual-submission policy, supplementary material, and desk-reject risk.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- icml-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an ICML main-track submission for OpenReview, LaTeX formatting, 8-page body, anonymity, supplementary material, impact statement, dual submission, concurrent ICML submissions, reciprocal reviewing, and LLM/prompt-injection policy compliance.JuridicFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- okr-buildermohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsCreate well-structured OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) for product teams, startups, and individuals. Use when asked to write OKRs, set quarterly goals, define key results, or review existing OKRs. Produces a complete OKR set with objectives, measurable key results, baselines, and a scoring guide.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- eacl-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical evidence for an EACL paper, covering tuned and LLM baselines, multilingual breadth matched to the claim, significance and variance floors, human-evaluation agreement, data-contamination controls, ablations, and error taxonomies, so that every stated result is measured rather than asserted.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- second-brain-metricsundefined-ui/second-brain-osRecord a dated snapshot of the vault's health numbers and compare against previous snapshots so trends are visible. Use this skill for a monthly or quarterly check, when the user asks whether the vault is improving, or asks to track its numbers over time. Do NOT use for a one-off graph analysis, which is second-brain-graph, or for structural repairs.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- dac-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when drafting or tightening the prose of an ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) Research Manuscript, covering the QoR-forward first-page arc, stating the design-automation contribution as a measured delta, fitting a complete argument into six double-column pages plus a references-only page, building column-width EDA figures, and third-person self-citation for double-blind review.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cvpr-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the experimental program of a CVPR paper, covering benchmark and baseline selection under matched-compute fairness, the ablation study reviewers treat as mandatory, qualitative and failure-case evidence, efficiency metrics tied to the Compute Reporting Form, and generalization tests beyond a single dataset.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- fse-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in an ESEC/FSE paper body versus its anonymized artifact and appendices, covering the ACM-template page budget, the rule that decision-critical evidence stays inside the reviewed pages, double-anonymous supplementary material, and how to split an empirical-SE paper between body and package.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- hri-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning the supplementary materials for an ACM/IEEE HRI full paper — above all the video figure that shows the embodied interaction, plus study instruments, extended results, and appendices — deciding what a reviewer must see to judge the interaction versus what belongs outside the 8-page body, all anonymized for double-blind review.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- hpca-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsJournal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包，从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程，助你快速发论文。PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- focs-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding whether and how computation appears in a FOCS (IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science) paper — a venue that accepts on theorems with no evaluation section expected — covering machine-verified case analyses, computer-discovered constructions, and honest illustrative plots.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- second-brain-reviewundefined-ui/second-brain-osProduce a periodic review of a second-brain vault: what was added, which topics are growing, what contradicts what, which questions are still open, and what is worth reading next. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a weekly or monthly review, asks what changed in their vault, what they have been learning about lately, or what they should look at next, and when a scheduled review task fires. Do NOT use for structural linting, for ingesting sources, or for answering a specific factual question.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
os-done-or-not
kharmanskyi/open-steps
AlteleActualizat 5 oct. 2026
De la autor
ALWAYS invoke this skill when work wraps up or the user asks how it went - "done or not", "are we done", "what happened", "report", "what's the status of this ticket" - in any language, and when a Stop hook asks for a session report. Produces a ten-line plain- language report: a lead, a checkmark table, and a verdict - fully done, anything needed from you, new debt, safe to close. Every "yes" names its proof; unverified says "not checked". Saves the report so the next session starts from it instead of re-exploring the repo.
Instalare
npx skills add kharmanskyi/open-steps --skill os-done-or-not -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/os-done-or-not/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: MIT
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență76
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție49
Fișiere (2)
- SKILL.md
- references/01-prod-promote.md