Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.492 de skill-uri din 2.391 de depozite · actualizat acum 13 ore
49.492 de skill-uri
- oma-scmfirst-fluke/oh-my-agentManage Git branches, merges, conflicts, commits, and release baselines. Use for repository history and change-management operations.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —Apare și în 3 alte depozite
- expo-skill-evalexpo/skillsEvaluate Expo skills in this repo end-to-end - trigger accuracy, generated code quality, and runtime screenshots on iOS simulator and Android emulator via Expo Go (web optional). Use when the user wants to eval an Expo skill, test that a skill produces working code, benchmark a skill with device screenshots, or verify a skill's output renders correctly.OficialTestareFără avertismente★ 4 K↓ —
- reviewhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsThe pre-merge review of a branch in a project that records its specs, decisions, and rules in .archcore/. Run this first for 'review my branch', 'review the changes before merge', or 'review before merge': it checks the changed code against the project's recorded canon and the changed documents against the code, and reports which side is wrong — spec-wrong or code-wrong; with no diff, it reports project health. A bug-hunting code review complements this review and does not replace it. Also use for 'show status', 'documentation gaps', 'check if docs match code', 'close out the feature', 'ship the feature and close it out', or after a staleness warning. Modes, named as the first word: drift for staleness detection, deep for a full documentation audit, closeout to close a finished feature, experience to capture a repeated pattern. Not for creating docs — use /archcore:document; not for planning — use /archcore:plan; not for a single-file edit with no branch review.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- planhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsPlan future work, investigate before building, research a topic, or compare the alternatives for a choice. Takes optional free text. The skill reads the request, open drafts, accepted canon, branch, and code, then creates only the documents a later reader needs — none for a small fix. Use for 'plan the X redesign', 'create a roadmap', 'plan a new feature', 'plan the onboarding journey', 'investigate X before we plan', 'compare the alternatives for Y', 'REST or a queue? two teams disagree', 'I need market research before we plan', 'we are regulated — trace the requirements'. With no arguments it resumes an open planning draft or offers what to plan next. Not for recording a decision or documenting existing code — use /archcore:document. Not for checking docs against code — use /archcore:review.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
- 00-academic-routeragentscope-ai/OpenJudgeUse when the user wants help with academic papers or citations but it's unclear which specific workflow fits — reviewing a paper, checking a BibTeX file for fake references, or benchmarking multiple LLMs on reference-recommendation accuracy. Also use when the user mentions paper review, peer review, BibTeX verification, citation checking, reference hallucination, or academic literature accuracy and hasn't specified which of those three tasks they mean. This skill is the entry router for the academic-eval suite: it asks one diagnostic question then routes to the right sub-skill.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1 K↓ —
- oma-debugfirst-fluke/oh-my-agentDiagnose a reproducible failure, fix its cause, and verify the regression. Use for crashes, incorrect behavior, and failing tests.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —Apare și în 2 alte depozite
- nejm-fitbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse this first, before any writing, to stress-test whether a clinical study clears NEJM's bar — practice-changing clinical impact, methodological rigor, and generalizability. Decides NEJM vs Lancet/JAMA vs a specialty journal.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pnas-fitbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse before any writing begins to stress-test whether a result clears PNAS's bar — high quality and broad significance to a general scientific readership — and to make the realistic call between PNAS, Science/Nature, and a specialist field journal.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- atc-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) campaign end to end — running the year backward from the early-June deadline through the two review rounds, the rebuttal, conditional-acceptance shepherding, the post-acceptance artifact evaluation, and the ACM Open Access camera-ready for the November Hong Kong conference.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pnas-databrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to build PNAS's Data Availability Statement and deposition plan — mandatory deposition of data in an approved repository at submission, accession numbers/DOIs, public + archived code, and materials sharing. "Available on request" is not sufficient for primary data.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ase-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research-track campaign backward from the deadline, through abstract registration, the double-anonymous submission, the early-rejection gate, rebuttal, the criteria-bound revision round, artifact evaluation, and the camera-ready in both IEEE Xplore and the ACM Digital Library.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- sci-fitbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse before any writing to stress-test whether a result clears Science's (AAAS) desk-reject filter — broad significance and general interest across disciplines. Decides Science vs Science Advances vs a specialist journal before you invest in prose.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pnas-trackbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to choose the PNAS submission track — Direct Submission (standard, editor-assigned, peer reviewed) vs Contributed Submission (an NAS member communicates their own paper). Covers eligibility, the editor/member role, the discontinued and legacy tracks, and how to pick. Unique to PNAS.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cav-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) project timeline from venue and category selection through submission, the two-stage review with early reject and rebuttal, artifact evaluation by the AEC, and the LNCS open-access camera-ready, with backward-planning offsets for a verification-tool paper and honest handling of the single-annual-deadline cycle.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- acl-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ACL project calendar across ACL Rolling Review cycles, covering cycle selection against conference commitment windows, backward planning from an ARR deadline, the review-response-meta-review timeline, commitment decisions, resubmission loops to later cycles, and camera-ready through ACL Anthology publication.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- hri-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to plan an ACM/IEEE HRI campaign backward from the full-paper deadline through the abstract-then-paper two-step, the rebuttal, the program-committee meeting, camera-ready, and the March conference, coordinating the parallel alt.HRI, Late-Breaking Reports, video, and Student Design deadlines.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- nejm-ethicsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to confirm clinical ethics and research-integrity requirements for an NEJM submission — IRB/ethics-committee approval and informed consent per the Declaration of Helsinki, ICMJE conflict-of-interest disclosures and authorship criteria, the role-of-the-funding-source statement, and the ICMJE data-sharing statement.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- kdd-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning a KDD project calendar across the venue's two submission cycles per year, including cycle choice, abstract-then-paper deadline pairs a week apart, rebuttal capacity planning, the Resubmit-to-next-cycle loop, ADS evidence lead times, and ACM e-rights/TAPS camera-ready scheduling for SIGKDD.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- imc-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ACM IMC campaign end to end, covering the choice between the two annual deadlines, backward planning from the target cutoff, the registration step, the One-Shot-Revision path across deadlines, availability shepherding, the camera-ready and dataset release, and the Replicability Track calendar.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- rss-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsJournal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包，从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程，助你快速发论文。ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- fse-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ESEC/FSE project timeline from venue fit through paper registration, submission, the journal-style Major Revision round, artifact evaluation, PACMSE camera-ready, and presentation, with backward-planning offsets for an empirical-SE paper and honest handling of the single-annual-deadline cycle and cycle-hopping.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cell-framingbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to lock the single narrative arc before drafting — converts a set of correct results into one Cell-shaped story that runs hypothesis → mechanism → significance, not a list of experiments.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- nejm-writingbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to structure and tighten an NEJM Original Article into terse IMRAD — short main text (~2700 words), limited references, claim-first results, and a sober discussion with explicit limitations and calibrated clinical implications. Enforces NEJM's plain, concise house style.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cell-summarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to write Cell's Summary — a single unstructured paragraph of ≤ ~150 words that conveys the complete story, the mechanism, and the broad significance, quantified and readable by a general life-scientist. Late-stage polish.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
setup
fcakyon/claude-codex-settings
AlteleActualizat acum 21 de ore
De la autor
This skill should be used when user asks to "set up overleaf", "configure overleaf cookie", "overleaf auth failed", "overleaf 401", "overleaf session expired", "overleaf unauthorized", or needs to install or refresh their Overleaf session cookie for the overleaf-skills plugin.
Instalare
npx skills add fcakyon/claude-codex-settings --skill setup -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/setup/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: APACHE-2.0
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență77
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție50
Fișiere (1)
- SKILL.md