Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.492 de skill-uri din 2.391 de depozite · actualizat acum 12 ore
49.492 de skill-uri
- add-opencodenanocoai/nanoclawUse OpenCode as an agent provider. OpenRouter, OpenAI, Google, DeepSeek, etc. via OpenCode config — not the Anthropic Agent SDK. Per group via `ncl groups config update --provider opencode`; host passes OPENCODE_* and XDG mount when spawning containers.AlteleFără avertismente★ 31,1 K↓ —
- clickhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsRecord revision-aware evidence for software work by default, or bind higher-risk execution to one human-readable approval contract in Guarded mode. Use when Click Hook context enables Evidence or Guarded mode, or when the user explicitly selects Click. Do not use for questions or explanations.JuridicFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- decision-memomohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsWrite a crisp decision memo that drives a clear decision, not a discussion. Use when asked to write a decision memo, a recommendation memo, a one/six-pager for a decision, or to get leadership to decide something. Produces a decision memo — the decision & recommendation up front, the context, options with trade-offs, what you'd need to believe, risks, and the explicit ask with a deadline.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- brainstormhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsExplore ideas, compare approaches, and produce a validated spec before planning. Use when the user describes what to build, asks how to approach something, proposes a new feature or design change, or needs to explore options before implementation.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- brooks-harnesshyhmrright/brooks-lintMaintenance orchestrator for the brooks-lint plugin itself. Runs a sequential subagent pipeline — author → eval → QA → trigger-audit → release — to add or edit a skill, refresh the eval suite, keep the four manifests + all README translations + CHANGELOG + AGENTS/GEMINI in sync, audit trigger boundaries, and cut releases. Drives the five agents in .claude/agents/ (skill-author, eval-curator, consistency-qa, trigger-boundary-auditor, release-manager). Triggers when the maintainer asks to work ON brooks-lint itself: "add a new skill", "edit the brooks-debt guide", "update the eval suite", "fix the trigger descriptions", "make this change and validate it", "release brooks-lint", "bump and publish", and follow-ups: "re-run", "re-validate", "update that skill", "redo the audit", "do the X part again". Do NOT trigger for: USING the brooks-lint analysis skills on some target codebase (that's brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test / brooks-health / brooks-sweep); generic questions about brooks-lint TestareFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —
- using-aegisGanyuanRan/AegisUse when starting a turn or checking Aegis skill routing.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ui-ux-governanceGanyuanRan/AegisUse when designing, changing, or reviewing user-facing interfaces or interaction flows, including API changes that alter visible states or recovery. Backend-only work without user-facing effects stays on its existing route.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pinme-llmglitternetwork/pinmeUse this skill when a PinMe project (Worker TypeScript) needs to call OpenRouter-backed LLM APIs, including models, chat/completions, streaming, or OpenRouter web search. Guides AI to generate correct Worker TS code.InginerieFără avertismente★ 3,8 K↓ —
- receiving-code-reviewGanyuanRan/AegisUse when receiving code review feedback before implementing suggestions, especially when feedback is unclear, risky, disputed, or technically questionable.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- communicating-conciselyGanyuanRan/AegisUse when the user asks for caveman mode, fewer tokens, brief responses, compressed communication, or otherwise explicitly requests a much shorter answer.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- test-driven-developmentGanyuanRan/AegisUse when the user explicitly requests strict or test-first TDD, or when the current conversation already contains an explicit `TDD Route: strict` decision from another Aegis workflow.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- subagent-driven-developmentGanyuanRan/AegisUse when executing a written implementation plan with independent tasks in the current session where delegation beats inline coordination cost; otherwise inline. Ad-hoc 2+ tasks without a plan use dispatching-parallel-agents.MarketingFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- company-briefmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsBuild a candidate's research brief on a company before an application or interview. Use when asked to research a company for a job, prep a company brief before an interview, or understand a prospective employer fast. Produces a one-page brief — what they do & how they make money, recent news & trajectory, product & competitors, likely challenges, culture signals, and smart questions to ask.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- cn-sop-writermohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsUse when asked 写作业指导书, SOP 作业指导书, 工序作业标准, 标准作业书, 新员工看得懂的操作说明, WI 怎么写, or write a shop-floor work instruction for a production or inspection step in a Chinese factory. Produces a one-station 作业指导书 in Chinese with the header block (文件编号, 版本, 工序, 产品, 标准工时), materials and tools, numbered steps with key points (要点) and the reasons, quality checks and limits, safety notes and PPE, photo or diagram placeholders, abnormal-situation handling, and a revision record, written for a new operator.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- establishing-project-contextGanyuanRan/AegisUse when the user asks to establish shared project language, or project work exposes a conflicting, renamed, or deprecated domain term that needs active semantic modeling. Routine small tasks stay on the fast path.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- verification-before-completionGanyuanRan/AegisUse when about to claim work is complete, fixed, passing, verified, release-ready, or ready to commit, merge, publish, or hand off.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- brooks-reviewhyhmrright/brooks-lintPR code review that surfaces decay risks, design smells, and maintainability issues with concrete Symptom → Source → Consequence → Remedy findings, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to review code, check a PR, shares a diff or pastes code asking "does this look right?" / "any issues here?" / "ready to merge?", or asks for feedback on a function, class, or file. Also triggers when user mentions: code smells / refactoring / clean architecture / DDD / SOLID principles / Hyrum's Law / deep modules / tactical programming / conceptual integrity / Brooks's Law / Mythical Man-Month / second system effect. Do NOT trigger for: questions about how to write code from scratch, language syntax questions, or framework/tool questions where no existing code is shared.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —
- brooks-debthyhmrright/brooks-lintTech debt assessment that identifies, classifies, and prioritizes maintainability problems — helping teams build a refactoring roadmap — drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks about tech debt, refactoring priorities, what to clean up first, or asks "why is this so hard to change?", "what should we fix first?", or "how do I justify refactoring to management?". Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime — "health" in those contexts is infrastructure, not code quality. Also not for single-function refactoring questions.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —
- bug-diagnosismohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsDiagnose a bug systematically instead of guessing — reproduce, isolate, form hypotheses, and test them to root cause. Use when debugging, chasing a defect, an intermittent failure, or 'why is this happening?'. Produces a structured diagnosis: a reliable repro, the narrowed-down location, ranked hypotheses with how to test each, and the root cause + fix once found.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- brooks-testhyhmrright/brooks-lintTest quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow execution, poor readability. Triggers when: user asks about test quality, shares test files for review, or expresses frustration: "tests keep breaking whenever I change anything", "our tests take forever", "tests pass but bugs still reach production", or "we have too many mocks". Do NOT trigger for: writing new tests from scratch (use the regular test-writing workflow) or testing framework/syntax questions — this skill reviews an existing suite for structural quality problems, not individual test authoring.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —
- product-analyticsalirezarezvani/claude-skillsUse when defining product KPIs, building metric dashboards, running cohort or retention analysis, or interpreting feature adoption trends across product stages.DateFără avertismente★ 29,3 K↓ —
- product-discoveryalirezarezvani/claude-skillsValidate product ideas: map assumptions, plan discovery sprints, test problem-solution fit. Use whenever the user asks if an idea is worth building.TestareFără avertismente★ 29,3 K↓ —
- verify-form-validationreticlehq/reticleCheck that a form actually rejects bad input: the error message renders, the submit button stays disabled, and no request goes out. Use when validation logic was written but never driven, when a "required" or pattern check looks right on screen but was never proven, or when a bug report says the form submitted invalid data anyway.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- brainstormingmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsRun a real brainstorm — divergent generation without judgment, then convergent selection with explicit criteria — instead of listing ten obvious ideas and calling it creativity. Use when asked to brainstorm, generate ideas or options, explore a solution space, or name something. Produces a genuinely wide option set (including the weird tail), then a shortlist selected against named criteria with the rejects preserved.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
csrd
Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance
FinanțeActualizat 10 oct. 2026
De la autor
Expert CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, EU 2022/2464) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about CSRD, European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), double materiality assessment, sustainability reporting obligations, ESG disclosure, CSRD scope and thresholds, value chain reporting, XBRL digital tagging, third-party assurance, CSRD gap assessments, CSRD implementation timelines, ESRS E1–E5 environmental standards, ESRS S1–S4 social standards, ESRS G1 governance, the 2026 Omnibus scope change (Directive (EU) 2026/470, 1,000+ employees) and revised/simplified ESRS (July 2026), CSRD vs GRI/TCFD/SASB alignment, or any EU corporate sustainability reporting question. Trigger even if the user only mentions "ESG reporting Europe", "sustainability disclosure EU", or "non-financial reporting".
Instalare
npx skills add Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance --skill csrd -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/csrd/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: MIT
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență76
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție49
Fișiere (4)
- SKILL.md
- references/compliance-program.md
- references/double-materiality.md
- references/esrs-standards.md