Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.492 de skill-uri din 2.391 de depozite · actualizat acum 11 ore
49.492 de skill-uri
- asc-localize-metadatarorkai/app-store-connect-cli-skillsAutomatically translate and sync App Store metadata (description, keywords, what's new, subtitle) to multiple languages using LLM translation and asc CLI. Use when asked to localize an app's App Store listing, translate app descriptions, or add new languages to App Store Connect.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,1 K↓ —
- wacv-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning a WACV campaign calendar across the two-round model, from track and round choice through the Round 1 submission, rebuttal, and Accept/Revise-and-Resubmit/Reject decision, into the Round 2 revision and decision, camera-ready, and the winter conference — with the branch points that a single-deadline plan misses.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vis-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an IEEE VIS full-paper submission for PCS readiness, covering the abstract-then-paper two-deadline structure under the VGTC society, the IEEE VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget, author-optional double-blind anonymization, the supplemental-material one-week window, and desk-reject triage before the AoE cutoff for a paper that will publish in IEEE TVCG.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vldb-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning a VLDB project on the PVLDB rolling calendar, covering month-picking strategy, the volume-to-conference mapping and acceptance cutoff, budgeting a possible three-month revision, coordinating author caps across a group, and backward planning from the 25th-abstract / 1st-paper rhythm.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- icdt-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what counts as evidence for an ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) result — matching-bound complexity analysis as the primary evidence, worked examples and counterexamples that establish separations, and, only for papers with an algorithmic contribution, a proportional and honestly-scoped experimental evaluation that does not pretend to be the contribution.DateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- uist-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning a UIST cycle end to end — the late-March abstract and paper deadlines, the ten-week build-freeze before video production, the rebuttal window, conditional acceptance, the July camera-ready, adjunct-track parallel lanes, and the November conference — with owners and risk buffers.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- acl-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing experiments for an ACL paper, covering tuned LLM baselines, multi-dataset and multilingual evaluation, statistical significance and variance, human evaluation with agreement reporting, contamination and prompt-sensitivity controls, ablations, and error-analysis expectations in NLP reviewing.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- wsdm-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning the calendar for a WSDM submission - the single annual cycle from August abstract and paper deadlines through October notification to the February conference, backward milestone planning, the September short-paper fallback, alternate entrances (demos, WSDM Cup, doctoral consortium), and coordination with sibling-venue deadlines.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ase-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) paper, covering real subject systems, fair runnable tool baselines, task-matched effectiveness metrics, ablations that isolate a learned component, oracle and correctness validation, contamination-aware LLM handling, and provenance for mining.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- iros-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing IROS experiments — real-robot trial counts, success criteria set in advance, reset procedures, failure taxonomies, baseline fairness on matched hardware, sim-to-real gap reporting, small-n statistics, and the claim-to-evidence ladder that embodied-systems reviewers apply before they trust a demo.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- socc-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ACM SoCC project timeline from venue fit through the two-round abstract+paper deadlines, the rebuttal, notification, camera-ready, and presentation, with backward-planning offsets for a cloud-systems measurement paper and honest handling of the two-rounds-per-year cadence and the no-cross-round-resubmission rule.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- popl-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning a POPL campaign calendar — backward-scheduling theory and mechanization from the July deadline, riding the October notification into the conditional-acceptance revision and artifact evaluation, landing the January conference, and retargeting across the SIGPLAN/PACMPL deadline wheel if July slips.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- uai-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a UAI submission for OpenReview readiness, covering the February paper deadline, the 8-page main part with unlimited appendices in one PDF, the 15 MB file cap, the optional 50 MB supplementary ZIP, double-blind rules, the reviewer-volunteer agreement, dual-submission checks, and desk-reject triage before upload.DocumenteFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- podc-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when building the evidence for an ACM PODC paper — where "evidence" is a proof, not a benchmark. Covers matching upper and lower bounds, tightness arguments, model and assumption stress-tests, adversary-strength calibration, and the honest, clearly-optional role of any simulation in a distributed-computing-theory paper.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pmla-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse as the entry point for any PMLA (Publications of the Modern Language Association) manuscript. Routes to the right PMLA sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and which venue fits — a regular blind-reviewed article or a special feature (Theories and Methodologies, The Changing Profession, Criticism in Translation, Little-known Documents). It dispatches; it does not draft content.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- brainstormingmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsRun a real brainstorm — divergent generation without judgment, then convergent selection with explicit criteria — instead of listing ten obvious ideas and calling it creativity. Use when asked to brainstorm, generate ideas or options, explore a solution space, or name something. Produces a genuinely wide option set (including the weird tail), then a shortlist selected against named criteria with the rejects preserved.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- second-brain-projectundefined-ui/second-brain-osSet up or update a project in the vault: the four-stage folder pipeline, a project-scoped CLAUDE.md with one goal, and links to the concept pages it depends on. Use this skill when the user starts something new they will work on over time, says "create a project", "set up a folder for X", or asks to define the goal and structure of ongoing work. Do NOT use for one-off tasks, for wiki pages about a topic, or for scoping an existing project down to work in it.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- pip-writermohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsWrite a Performance Improvement Plan a manager can defend and an employee can actually act on — specific concerns, measurable goals, real support, and an honest timeline. Use when asked to write a PIP, put someone on a performance plan, document underperformance, or build a formal improvement plan. Produces the concern statement, the measurable goals with success criteria, the support plan, the check-in cadence, and the consequences — HR/legal-ready. Complements pip-responder (the employee's side).RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- pldi-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning a PLDI campaign across its annual clock — backward-planning from the November deadline through winter reviewing, the February response window, March notification, post-acceptance artifact evaluation, PACMPL production, and the June conference, with owners for each deliverable.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pnas-abstractbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to write the PNAS abstract — a single self-contained paragraph of ~250 words, quantified and accessible to a broad scientific audience. Distinguishes the abstract (what/how/found, for scientists) from the Significance Statement (why-it-matters, for everyone). Late-stage polish.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pnas-rebuttalbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse after PNAS reviews arrive to triage the decision, prioritize experiments, and draft a point-by-point response that is respectful, evidence-led, and honest about limits. Do not run before the main text is actually revised.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- close-specdzhng/skillsWhen a spec under specs/<feature>/ is done shipping (a write-spec build, or any planned task that produced a spec), archive it to specs/done/ and rewrite it from a build-plan into a durable rationale — the why, the principles, the invariants — pointing back to the real code for the how. Use when implementation has landed and the plan no longer matches what shipped, or the user says a feature/spec is finished. Pairs with [write-spec](../write-spec/SKILL.md) (the plan this closes) and [review](../review/SKILL.md) (run before closing).PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- nejm-rebuttalbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse after NEJM reviews arrive — often including a dedicated statistical reviewer and an editor letter — to triage the decision, answer statistical comments rigorously, and draft a point-by-point response that quotes each comment, the response, and the revised manuscript text. Do not run before the main text is actually revised.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- nejm-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding which nejm-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a clinical manuscript from significance test through response to reviewers for The New England Journal of Medicine. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
captions
ZeroPointRepo/youtube-skills
MediaActualizat ieri
De la autor
Use when captions, subtitles, or the spoken text of a YouTube video is needed — even if not explicitly requested: pasted video links or IDs, requests to read, quote, or translate a video, accessibility needs, deaf/HoH use cases, content review, or language learning. Fetches timestamped caption data from any YouTube video. Not for uploading subtitles or account management.
Instalare
npx skills add ZeroPointRepo/youtube-skills --skill captions -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/captions/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniFolosește rețeauaLicență: MIT
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență76
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție49
Fișiere (3)
- SKILL.md
- references/auth-setup.md
- references/curl-examples.md