Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.492 de skill-uri din 2.391 de depozite · actualizat acum 8 ore
49.492 de skill-uri
- planhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsPlan a game or app with the person before building it — sensible defaults from their request, with an interview only when requested that ends in the game's Game Codex, games/<id>/CODEX.md, drawn as a page in the game's own palette, fonts and art that anyone can read and steer (a Claude artifact where the app has artifacts, else a page in their browser, and a private page on the studio's site), kept true as decisions change, with the build's progress on it. Use for step 4 of a new studio, or when someone says "let's plan my game", "what should my game be", "make a design doc, a game bible or a codex", "show me the plan", or before a big change to a game.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- foia-requestmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsDraft a public-records request (FOIA / FOI / state open-records) that's specific enough to get records and hard to deny. Use when asked to write a FOIA request, records request, or freedom-of-information request to a government body. Produces a properly-scoped request: the records sought, date range and format, fee-waiver and expedited-processing asks where applicable, and citations to the governing statute.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- wiki-summarymohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsFetch Wikipedia's current summary of any topic with zero API keys — the REST summary endpoint via curl, for answers that need today's article rather than training-data memory. Use when asked what does Wikipedia say about X, get me the current summary of a topic, check a fact against Wikipedia, or has this article changed. Produces the live extract with the article link, disambiguation handling, and a clean separation between what Wikipedia says and what the model adds.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- sharpenNouhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsRewrite a draft prompt so it asks for an expert-depth version of the same task (expert moves, raw sources, named methods, an outside check) without widening scope. Returns the rewritten prompt and does not do the task. Use for "/sharpen <prompt>" or "make this prompt better before I send it".ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- gamehashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsMake or change a rules-plus-view multiplayer web game inside a Homie studio — the server runs the rules, each browser predicts its own movement and renders the game, strangers meet in public rooms, bots fill empty seats, rounds end and restart — prove it with two browsers finishing a round, and give it an epic landing page (a full-bleed hero from its own footage or art, the pitch, Play, phone / computer / TV, live rooms, how to play, credits). Use when someone in a Homie studio (a folder with studio.json) asks for a new game, a change to a game, a game whose own AI decides (opponents picking tactics, an NPC's reaction, a director's call, a turn's move), or a better page for a game ("make my game's landing page epic").DesignFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- tddhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsUse when implementing or fixing production code with tests.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- clinical-researchalirezarezvani/claude-skillsUse when designing a prospective clinical study: choosing primary and secondary endpoints, estimating sample size and power, or scoring feasibility before submission. Runs endpoint_selector.py, sample_size_estimator.py and phase_gate_scorer.py; outputs are estimates for a biostatistician to confirm.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 29,3 K↓ —
- cikm-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when turning an accepted CIKM paper into its ACM proceedings version inside the short notification-to-camera-ready window, covering de-anonymization, the e-rights and TAPS pipeline into the ACM Digital Library, CCS concepts and metadata, GenAI-disclosure retention, artifact link publication, and Rome presentation logistics.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- asplos-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ASPLOS campaign across the two-deadline cycle — sequencing evidence building, the September 9, 2026 submission gate, author-response windows, the December 21 notification, Major Revision resubmission six weeks later, artifact evaluation, and the April 2027 conference in Crete, with owners per risk.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- atc-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) submission is evaluated — the two-round extended-abstract model, the round-one gate by two reviewers, the round-two read by 3-4 reviewers, double-blind reviewing, rebuttal, conditional acceptance with shepherding, and how ATC differs from OSDI/SOSP/NSDI.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cav-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) submission is evaluated, covering the two-stage reviewing process (two reviews then an early-reject filter, then two more reviews with a rebuttal), the partial double-anonymity by category, the accept/reject outcome, the optional non-conditional artifact evaluation, and how CAV differs from TACAS and FMCAD.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ase-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research submission is evaluated, covering double-anonymous review, the early-rejection stage before rebuttal, the Accept / Revision / Reject outcomes, the criteria-bound revision round, and how ASE's process differs from FSE's PACMSE Major Revision, ICSE's cycles, and ISSTA's rounds.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vis-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising an IEEE VIS paper for a task-grounded visualization contribution on the first page, a design rationale that ties each visual encoding and interaction to a task, evaluation matched to the contribution type, honest limitations, and disciplined use of the VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget for a paper that will be read as an IEEE TVCG journal article.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- wacv-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing WACV experiments, covering Applications-track systems evidence (latency, power, robustness under real constraints) versus Algorithms-track matched-baseline novelty, comparative assessment under the deployed condition, uncertainty over seeds and sessions, ablations, and evidence that survives the two-round review.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- aaai-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- aaai-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- wsdm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a WSDM paper - offline ranking and recommendation metrics with bias controls, temporal-split protocols for interaction logs, baseline selection from recent WSDM/SIGIR/KDD editions, ablations that isolate the mechanism, efficiency reporting, and online-evidence framing.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- sosp-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a SOSP paper — mapping every claim to an experiment, choosing baselines a systems PC will accept as fair, mixing microbenchmarks with end-to-end and failure runs, reporting tails and overheads honestly, and isolating the mechanism the design credits.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vis-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in an IEEE VIS paper body versus its supplemental materials, covering the VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget, the supplemental video that VIS reviewers routinely watch, the one-week supplemental deadline extension, double-blind supplemental anonymization, and how to split a visualization paper between the reviewed pages and the archive.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- minutes-briefsilverstein/minutesFast non-interactive briefing before any meeting — auto-detects your next calendar event, pulls relationship history, surfaces open commitments, and produces a one-page brief in under 30 seconds. Use this whenever the user says "brief me", "give me a quick brief", "what's coming up", "background on my next call", "who am I meeting next", "brief me on Sarah", "I have a call in 10 min", "quick rundown", or right before walking into a meeting. Different from /minutes-prep — brief is the fast hook-fireable version that doesn't ask questions and doesn't set goals. Use brief when speed matters; use prep when the user wants to think hard about goals first.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
- pods-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the analytical "evidence" of an ACM PODS paper — worst-case and average-case analyses, matching upper and lower bounds, dichotomy completeness, correct complexity assumptions, and the occasional empirical validation when a theory paper claims practicality — matching the rigor to the shape of each theoretical claim.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- executive-cvmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsWrite an executive or senior leadership CV and the matching board biography: scope, business results and governance up front, two to three pages, written for search firms and boards. Use when asked to write my executive CV, director or C-suite resume, CV for a headhunter, board bio, or non-executive director application. Produces the executive CV with a scope line per role, a results-led profile, a 150-word board biography in the third person, and a short brief for search consultants.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- popl-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing the empirical component of a POPL paper — deciding whether evidence should be a mechanization, a prototype, case studies, or benchmarks; reporting proof effort and case-study coverage honestly; and keeping performance numbers in a supporting role so the formal claim stays the paper's center of gravity.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pldi-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing a PLDI evaluation — choosing defensible benchmark suites and baseline compiler configurations, measuring runtime, compile time, and memory with warmup and variance discipline, running ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism, and scoping claims to the platforms measured.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
scrapecreators-api
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills
BrowserActualizat 27 oct. 2026
De la autor
Provider reference for collecting public profiles, posts, comments, transcripts, trends, and ad-library data from major social platforms through ScrapeCreators. Use as a dependency of research workflows, not as the final user-facing deliverable.
Instalare
npx skills add gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill scrapecreators-api -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/scrapecreators-api/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: MIT
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență77
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție50
Fișiere (2)
- SKILL.md
- skill.meta.json