Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.492 de skill-uri din 2.391 de depozite · actualizat acum 7 ore
49.492 de skill-uri
- hpca-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an HPCA project timeline from venue fit through the two-step July registration and paper gate, the autumn review wait, the single rebuttal/revision window, notification, IEEE camera-ready, artifact evaluation, and the February/March talk, with backward-planning offsets for a hardware-evaluated paper.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- icra-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ICRA submission calendar end to end — the September paper deadline, the two video-attachment windows, winter review silence, late-January notification, March camera-ready, and the May/June conference — or when interleaving a fallback RA-L or IROS plan around the single annual ICRA shot.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- oncall-runbookmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsWrite an on-call runbook for a service — covering alert definitions, escalation paths, common incident responses, and on-call handoff procedures. Use when asked to write an on-call guide, create alert runbooks, document escalation procedures, or prepare an on-call handoff document. Produces a structured on-call runbook with per-alert response procedures, escalation matrix, diagnostic commands, and handoff template.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- red-green-proofalirezarezvani/claude-skillsTurns a suspected bug into a proven one. Verify the cause against reality before claiming it, write a test that FAILS on the current code, apply the fix, watch it pass — then revert the fix and confirm the test goes red again, because a test that passes both ways proves nothing. Invoked bare after a debugging conversation, it takes the target from context rather than asking. Use when fixing a bug, investigating an incident, hardening a flaky area, or when asked to "add tests that reveal the bug". Triggers on "/red-green-proof", "prove the bug", "red-green", "make the test fail first", "is that test load-bearing", "reveal the bug with a test".TestareFără avertismente★ 29,3 K↓ —
- oncall-handoffmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsWrite a structured end-of-shift on-call handoff so the incoming engineer inherits state, not surprises. Use when asked to write an on-call handoff, oncall handover, shift handoff, pager handoff, or end-of-week SRE summary. Produces a handoff note with open incidents, watchlist alerts, in-flight investigations, recent changes, and one-line asks.FinanțeFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- isca-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning a full ISCA campaign on a calendar — working back from the expected mid-November abstract and paper deadlines to freeze simulation evidence in time, staffing the winter two-round review wait, preparing for the February-March rebuttal and revision window, and branching to camera-ready, artifacts, and the June conference.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- minutes-lintsilverstein/minutesHealth-check your meeting knowledge for contradictions, stale commitments, and decision conflicts. Use when the user asks "any conflicts in my meetings", "check for stale action items", "lint my meetings", "consistency check", "are there contradictions", or wants to audit their decision history.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
- calendar-defragmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsDefragment a work calendar through a tool-using agent — find the meeting debt, propose the consolidation, and (approval-gated) execute the moves. Use when asked to defrag my calendar, get me focus time, audit my meetings, or fix my week. Produces the calendar audit (cost per meeting, fragmentation map), a defrag proposal with focus blocks, and an approval-gated execution plan.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- skillhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsA curated list of awesome OpenAI Codex / ChatGPT plugins, skills, and resources. The #1 Codex Marketplace. See live plugins at: https://hol.org/plugins/best-codex-pluginsAlteleFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- podc-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when building the evidence for an ACM PODC paper — where "evidence" is a proof, not a benchmark. Covers matching upper and lower bounds, tightness arguments, model and assumption stress-tests, adversary-strength calibration, and the honest, clearly-optional role of any simulation in a distributed-computing-theory paper.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- brooks-auditActualizathyhmrright/brooks-lintArchitecture audit that maps module dependencies, checks layering integrity, and flags structural decay across a codebase, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to audit architecture, review folder/module structure, check for circular imports, understand how the codebase is organized, or asks "does this follow clean architecture?" or "why does everything depend on everything?". Also triggers for onboarding requests: "explain this codebase to a new developer" or "give me a codebase tour" (use onboarding mode). Do NOT trigger for: PR-level code review (use brooks-review) or line-level refactoring questions — this skill analyzes structural/module-level concerns, not individual functions.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —
- planning-with-filesOthmanAdi/planning-with-filesPersistent file-based planning for multi-step AI-agent work. Keeps task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md on disk; lifecycle hooks inject selected project planning context. Automatic recovery reads project planning files only. Explicit session-catchup.py --metadata reads same-project local agent session records and emits aggregate counts only; --replay may emit bounded nonce-framed excerpts. Optional gated mode can request continuation only when the host supports it and never runs commands declared in Markdown. The skill has no network upload path. Use for research or work needing 5+ tool calls.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 27,9 K↓ —
- nejm-abstractbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to write the NEJM structured abstract — four headed sections (Background, Methods, Results, Conclusions), ≤250 words, with the trial registration number and funding source, leading the Results with the primary outcome reported as an effect size with a 95% CI. Late-stage polish skill.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- iros-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing IROS experiments — real-robot trial counts, success criteria set in advance, reset procedures, failure taxonomies, baseline fairness on matched hardware, sim-to-real gap reporting, small-n statistics, and the claim-to-evidence ladder that embodied-systems reviewers apply before they trust a demo.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- life-premortemmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsWrite the failure story of your year, relationship, move, or big life bet in advance — imagine it's a year later and it went wrong, tell that story vividly, then mine it for the real risks and the cheap things that would have prevented them. Use when someone says 'I'm about to make a big life change', 'what could go wrong with this', 'de-risk my year', or is committing to something large and irreversible. Produces the failure narrative, the extracted risk list with preventatives, and the early-warning signs to watch. The life-scale sibling of a project premortem.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- nsdi-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an NSDI submission — choosing traces, testbeds, and deployment evidence, sizing scale and failure-injection experiments, picking baselines that fight back, and reporting tail behavior so networked-systems reviewers can see where the design wins, loses, and breaks.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- fse-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising an ESEC/FSE paper for a practitioner-grounded software-engineering contribution on the first page, research-question contracts, a threats-to-validity section that argues rather than recites, evidence proportional to the claim, double-anonymous wording, and disciplined use of the ACM-template page budget.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- readyhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsUnderstand what you mean before anything is built. Takes anything — a one-line idea, notes, a spec, or a mix — reads the project first, asks only what is yours to decide, and writes your intent down for you to approve. Use when the user invokes the `ready` skill. Requires git.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —Apare și în 3 alte depozite
- hri-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when drafting or revising an ACM/IEEE HRI full paper's structure and prose for an interdisciplinary audience — leading with the human-robot contribution and research questions, making hypotheses and measures explicit, describing the robot embodiment, keeping claims proportional to the study within the 8-page acmart budget, and writing so the chosen track's contribution type is unmistakable.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ab-test-readoutmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsAnalyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- eccv-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the experimental program of an ECCV paper — benchmark selection that survives a September conference, matched-substrate baseline fairness in the foundation-model era, ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism, qualitative failure evidence, and run sequencing toward a March freeze.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- osdi-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an OSDI submission — choosing mature baselines and realistic workloads, structuring the section around research questions, measuring scalability and tail behavior, quantifying the design's costs, and fitting the evidence into the 12-page reviewed body.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- soda-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding whether and how experiments belong in a SODA (ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms) paper — SODA's scope includes experimental validation but theorems carry the decision, so this skill designs supporting numerics honestly and routes implementation-led work to co-located ALENEX or to SEA.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- brooks-testActualizathyhmrright/brooks-lintTest quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow execution, poor readability. Triggers when: user asks about test quality, shares test files for review, or expresses frustration: "tests keep breaking whenever I change anything", "our tests take forever", "tests pass but bugs still reach production", or "we have too many mocks". Do NOT trigger for: writing new tests from scratch (use the regular test-writing workflow) or testing framework/syntax questions — this skill reviews an existing suite for structural quality problems, not individual test authoring.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —
lancet-ethics
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
ȘtiințăActualizat 27 sept. 2026
De la autor
Use to satisfy The Lancet's clinical-ethics and research-integrity requirements — ethics-committee approval and informed consent under the Declaration of Helsinki, the Declaration of interests, ICMJE author contributions, the role-of-the-funding-source statement, the data-sharing statement, patient and public involvement, and SAGER sex/gender plus equity reporting.
Instalare
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill lancet-ethics -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/lancet-ethics/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: MIT
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență77
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție50
Fișiere (1)
- SKILL.md