Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.492 de skill-uri din 2.391 de depozite · actualizat acum 5 ore
49.492 de skill-uri
- cscw-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when readying a CSCW manuscript for upload — confirming the current pathway (rolling via Manuscript Central as of mid-2026), the single-column ACM template, the word-length scrutiny band, anonymization of author and community identifiers, ethics statements, and desk-risk triage.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- corl-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing or auditing a CoRL OpenReview submission — the corl_2026 LaTeX template, the 8-page main text with a mandatory Limitations section counted inside it, uncounted references and appendix, the supplementary file and 250 MB video, double-anonymous rules, abstract registration, and dual-submission checks.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ecai-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an ECAI submission for readiness — the abstract-then-full-paper two-deadline flow, the tight 7-page body budget, double-blind anonymity, the correct template/publisher regime (ecai.cls/FAIA for a standalone ECAI vs ijcai.sty/IJCAI proceedings for the joint IJCAI-ECAI 2026), the per-author submission cap, the ethics statement, and desk-reject triage before the AoE cutoff.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- dac-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when writing or auditing the related-work and positioning of an ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) Research Manuscript, covering the EDA literature lanes (DAC/ICCAD/DATE/ASP-DAC/TCAD/TODAES), delta-first positioning against the strongest prior tool, honest benchmark-suite lineage, and third-person self-citation under double-blind review within the six-page budget.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- dac-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing the final ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) Research-Manuscript camera-ready after acceptance, covering de-anonymization, restoring author/affiliation/acknowledgement/funding blocks, the ACM copyright form and rights stamp, the April proceedings deadline, ACM Digital Library metadata and archival-flow checks, and the still-fixed 6+1 page budget.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cav-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) submission against the verification literature across CAV, TACAS, FMCAD, VMCAI, POPL/PLDI, and the journals (FMSD, JAR, TOCL, STTT), writing delta-first contrast rather than a citation catalog, crediting the right benchmark and tool lineages, keeping self-citations double-anonymous for the anonymized categories, and handling concurrent and prior-version overlap.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cell-highlightsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to produce the three signature Cell front-matter artifacts — Highlights (3–4 bullets, each ≤85 characters), the eTOC/In Brief blurb (~50 words, third-person), and the Graphical Abstract (single-panel visual summary). Late-stage polish.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- chi-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing an accepted ACM CHI paper for publication — the TAPS source upload, the PCS publication-ready package, mandatory accessibility work (alt text, screen-reader-friendly PDFs, table headers), video previews, ACM's open-access model, e-rights, and registration deadlines.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- chi-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when building the related-work section of an ACM CHI paper — covering the HCI venue family and the non-CS disciplines CHI draws on, positioning against the last few CHI cycles, keeping self-citation anonymous — in a venue where insufficient contextualization is the top assisted desk-reject ground.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ccs-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ACM CCS project timeline across the two HotCRP review cycles, from venue fit through abstract registration, full-paper upload, rebuttal, notification, revision, artifact evaluation, ACM camera-ready, and in-person presentation, with backward-planning offsets and the security big-four deadline-hopping calendar.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- acl-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning an ACL submission against the NLP literature, covering ACL Anthology citation practice, arXiv-versus-published version citation, concurrent LLM-era preprints, prior-cycle ARR resubmission overlap, anonymity-preserving self-citation, and the fast-moving baseline problem in computational linguistics.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ase-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing the ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) camera-ready after acceptance or a successful revision, covering systematic de-anonymization, the extra content page, the mandatory Data Availability finalization, the correct IEEE/ACM template and metadata, permanentized artifact links, and dual IEEE-Xplore/ACM-DL production checks.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- aamas-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an AAMAS project timeline from venue fit through abstract, full-paper or extended-abstract upload, supplementary material, the double-blind rebuttal, decision, IFAAMAS camera-ready, registration, and presentation, with track-specific deadlines and backward-planning offsets for a game-theory-plus-experiments paper.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- sci-writingbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when choosing the Science (AAAS) format (Research Article vs Report) and holding its length and structure budgets — main-text word caps, figure caps, argument-ordered Results, and deciding what belongs in the main text versus Supplementary Materials.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- aaai-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an AAAI main technical track submission for OpenReview readiness, double-blind anonymity, page limits, reproducibility checklist, supplementary material, author limits, multiple-submission policy, and AAAI AI-use policy compliance.JuridicFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- sci-figuresbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to finalize Science display items — panel/word budget, column-width sizing, minimum font sizes, color-accessibility, and showing the data (points over bars). Enforces figure rigor before submission.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- nejm-reportingbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to select and enforce the correct EQUATOR reporting guideline for a clinical study headed to NEJM — CONSORT for RCTs (with the participant flow diagram), STROBE for observational, PRISMA for systematic reviews — and to build the required checklist and diagram before submission.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- rss-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsJournal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包，从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程，助你快速发论文。PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- uai-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing UAI experiments where inference quality is the endpoint, covering calibration and coverage measurement, posterior diagnostics, structure-recovery metrics for causal and graphical models, seeded repeated runs, baselines from both sampling and optimization families, and mapping each claim to its evidence.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- fse-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing ESEC/FSE empirical evaluations, covering real subject systems, fair baselines, SE-standard statistics and effect sizes, qualitative and mixed-methods rigor, contamination-aware LLM ablations, provenance for mining studies, and matching evidence to the shape of each software-engineering claim.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cav-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) empirical evaluation, covering standard benchmark sets (SV-COMP/SMT-COMP/HWMCC/VNN-COMP), fair baseline solvers with pinned versions and equal resource limits, timeout-dominated comparisons, soundness cross-checks and proof witnesses, cactus/scatter reporting, and matching evidence to the shape of each verification claim.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- dac-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical evaluation of an ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) Research Manuscript, covering standard EDA benchmark suites (ISPD, EPFL, ISCAS/ITC, TAU, CircuitNet, OpenROAD flows), fair state-of-the-art baselines, QoR/PPA reporting with runtime, per-benchmark honesty, ablations that isolate the mechanism, and contamination-aware ML-for-EDA evaluation.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- hri-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the human-subjects study at the heart of an ACM/IEEE HRI full paper — choosing between/within-subjects designs, running Wizard-of-Oz honestly, powering the sample, reporting statistics with effect sizes and qualitative rigor, selecting validated scales, adding manipulation checks, pre-registering, and meeting HRI's human-participants ethics obligations.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- chi-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the studies behind an ACM CHI paper — matching evidence shape to contribution type, powering quantitative experiments, making qualitative work rigorous and auditable, reporting participants and ethics properly, and avoiding the ADR-Data and ADR-Method screening grounds.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
minutes-prep
silverstein/minutes
InginerieActualizat acum 11 ore
De la autor
Interactive meeting preparation — builds a relationship brief and talking points before a call. Use when the user says "prep me for my call with", "I'm meeting with X", "prepare me for", "what should I bring up with", "meeting prep", "get ready for my call", or wants to review history with someone before a meeting.
Instalare
npx skills add silverstein/minutes --skill minutes-prep -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/minutes-prep/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: MIT
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență78
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție51
Fișiere (1)
- SKILL.md