Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.492 de skill-uri din 2.391 de depozite · actualizat acum 4 ore
49.492 de skill-uri
- rss-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsJournal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包，从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程，助你快速发论文。PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- resumemohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsRédige un CV percutant, orienté résultats, qui passe les filtres ATS et décroche l'entretien. À utiliser quand on demande d'écrire ou de réécrire un CV, de transformer une expérience en CV, ou d'adapter un CV à une offre. Produit un CV sobre, en une colonne, compatible ATS — accroche, expérience en puces de réalisations chiffrées, compétences et formation — prêt à exporter en PDF mis en page.DocumenteFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- kdd-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising a KDD paper into the venue's register, where the first page names a data regime, a mechanism, and scale evidence, efficiency adjectives trace to design decisions, and two-column sigconf pages punish sprawl. Covers Research vs ADS voice, dataset-size discipline, assertive contribution bullets, and 8-page compression.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ipsn-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing IPSN-lineage evaluations, covering real testbeds and deployments, ground-truth instrumentation, energy/latency/footprint measurement on real hardware, on-device/TinyML profiling, estimation-theoretic baselines and bounds, and matching evidence to the shape of each sensing claim across the IP and SPOTS tracks.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- lancet-writingbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to structure and hold the length of a Lancet Article main text — Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion (~3000–3500 words), the Research in context panel, a limited reference list (~30), and a cautious, globally minded Discussion that does not overstate.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- imc-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when drafting or revising the prose of an ACM IMC measurement paper, covering the first-page measurement finding, making vantage points and methodology auditable, longitudinal framing for a moving Internet, arguing limitations rather than reciting them, writing the Ethics section early, and acmart page-budget discipline.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- icse-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an ICSE research-track paper, covering subject and benchmark selection, baseline fairness, statistical tests and effect sizes as SE reviewers expect them, qualitative-methods rigor, ablations for AI-based techniques, and threats-driven study design.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- icdm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical evaluation for an ICDM (IEEE International Conference on Data Mining) paper - mining-task definition, strong and fairly-tuned baselines, ablations that isolate the named mechanism, scalability curves that test scale claims, and discovery-validity checks that separate real findings from evaluation artifacts.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- icra-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the experimental section of an ICRA paper — real-robot versus simulation-only evidence, trial counts and success-rate reporting, task distributions and resets, baseline fairness on shared hardware, sim-to-real transfer claims, failure-mode analysis, and the statistics robotics reviewers actually expect.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- focs-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding whether and how computation appears in a FOCS (IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science) paper — a venue that accepts on theorems with no evaluation section expected — covering machine-verified case analyses, computer-discovered constructions, and honest illustrative plots.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- hri-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning the supplementary materials for an ACM/IEEE HRI full paper — above all the video figure that shows the embodied interaction, plus study instruments, extended results, and appendices — deciding what a reviewer must see to judge the interaction versus what belongs outside the 8-page body, all anonymized for double-blind review.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- partshashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsStudios build on each other with parts from games, apps, music and video that their owners choose to share or sell (a creature, a level generator, a chase camera, a bot brain, a pickup mechanic, an audio pack). Use this when planning or making games, apps, music or video (look for pieces before writing one from scratch), when the person asks what parts exist, says "use the X from that game", "make this reusable" or "share this", and before a game that uses parts goes online.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- fse-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in an ESEC/FSE paper body versus its anonymized artifact and appendices, covering the ACM-template page budget, the rule that decision-critical evidence stays inside the reviewed pages, double-anonymous supplementary material, and how to split an empirical-SE paper between body and package.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cvpr-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the experimental program of a CVPR paper, covering benchmark and baseline selection under matched-compute fairness, the ablation study reviewers treat as mandatory, qualitative and failure-case evidence, efficiency metrics tied to the Compute Reporting Form, and generalization tests beyond a single dataset.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- telemetrymicrosoft/power-platform-skillsUse this skill when the user wants to enable, disable, turn on or off, opt out of, opt in to, or check the status of power-automate telemetry / usage data. Triggers: "disable telemetry", "turn off telemetry", "opt out of telemetry", "stop collecting usage data", "enable telemetry", "telemetry status".AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,1 K↓ —
- ap-feature-coordinatorSpielewoy/autoprompt-skillReport the compatibility redirect to `ap-run-coordinator`; this retired role cannot perform new work.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,2 K↓ —
- dac-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when drafting or tightening the prose of an ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) Research Manuscript, covering the QoR-forward first-page arc, stating the design-automation contribution as a measured delta, fitting a complete argument into six double-column pages plus a references-only page, building column-width EDA figures, and third-person self-citation for double-blind review.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- eacl-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical evidence for an EACL paper, covering tuned and LLM baselines, multilingual breadth matched to the claim, significance and variance floors, human-evaluation agreement, data-contamination controls, ablations, and error taxonomies, so that every stated result is measured rather than asserted.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cav-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) submission for portal readiness, covering the four submission categories (Regular / Short Tool / Short Application / Industrial Experience & Case Studies), the LNCS page limits, the per-category anonymization matrix, the artifact-intent declaration, and desk-reject triage before the AoE paper deadline.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cell-citationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to convert references to Cell Press author–date style — in-text "(Smith et al., 2021)", an alphabetical reference list by first author with full author lists, journal names spelled out. This is the OPPOSITE of Science's numbered-by-appearance style.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pnas-writingbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to structure a PNAS main text and hold its length — Title, Significance Statement, Abstract, Introduction, Results, Discussion, in-text Materials and Methods, references — and to choose the required Classification (Biological/Physical/Social Sciences + minor subject) and keywords at submission.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- atc-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) submission for HotCRP readiness — the paired two-page extended abstract plus full paper, the two-column 12/6-page budget, the double-blind anonymity sweep, ACM Open Access publication, and desk-reject triage before the early-June AoE cutoff.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- acl-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an ACL submission before an ACL Rolling Review cycle deadline, covering long/short paper page budgets, the mandatory Limitations section, Responsible NLP checklist, anonymized PDFs and supplements, preprint declarations, dual-submission rules, resubmission linking, and ARR desk-reject triggers on OpenReview.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ase-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research-track submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the ACM acmart sigconf template and the 10+2 page budget, double-anonymous review, the mandatory Data Availability Statement, the early-rejection stage before rebuttal, and desk-reject triage before the deadline.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
why
hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins
NouFinanțeActualizat acum 17 ore
De la autor
Explain why code exists in its current form by sending one investigator to each reachable evidence source and returning a cited, confidence-graded answer. Use for "why does this exist", "why was it built this way", "where did this limit come from", "is this dead code".
Instalare
npx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill why -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/why/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: APACHE-2.0
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență78
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție51
Fișiere (13)
- SKILL.md
- references/epistemics.md
- references/investigator-brief.md
- references/source-index.md
- references/sources/code-archaeology.md
- references/sources/databricks.md
- references/sources/datadog.md
- references/sources/incident-postmortem.md
- references/sources/linear.md
- references/sources/notion.md
- references/sources/sentry.md
- references/sources/slack.md
- încă 1