Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.492 de skill-uri din 2.391 de depozite · actualizat acum 2 ore
49.492 de skill-uri
- cvpr-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning a CVPR submission campaign end to end, covering the November abstract/paper/supplement deadline chain, coauthor reviewer-duty scheduling, the January rebuttal sprint, February decisions, camera-ready and June conference logistics, and the resubmission ladder across ICCV, ECCV, and the next CVPR.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- sosp-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning a SOSP campaign across the annual cycle — back-scheduling from the spring abstract and paper deadlines, running the summer response and July notification, stacking the August camera-ready with artifact evaluation, and retargeting rejections across the SOSP/OSDI/EuroSys circuit.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- fse-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in an ESEC/FSE paper body versus its anonymized artifact and appendices, covering the ACM-template page budget, the rule that decision-critical evidence stays inside the reviewed pages, double-anonymous supplementary material, and how to split an empirical-SE paper between body and package.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cvpr-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the experimental program of a CVPR paper, covering benchmark and baseline selection under matched-compute fairness, the ablation study reviewers treat as mandatory, qualitative and failure-case evidence, efficiency metrics tied to the Compute Reporting Form, and generalization tests beyond a single dataset.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- focs-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding whether and how computation appears in a FOCS (IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science) paper — a venue that accepts on theorems with no evaluation section expected — covering machine-verified case analyses, computer-discovered constructions, and honest illustrative plots.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- auto-researchhuytieu/COG-second-brainDeep strategic research engine — decomposes questions into parallel research threads, spawns multiple agents, and synthesizes into actionable strategic analysisȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
- hri-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning the supplementary materials for an ACM/IEEE HRI full paper — above all the video figure that shows the embodied interaction, plus study instruments, extended results, and appendices — deciding what a reviewer must see to judge the interaction versus what belongs outside the 8-page body, all anonymized for double-blind review.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- imc-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when drafting or revising the prose of an ACM IMC measurement paper, covering the first-page measurement finding, making vantage points and methodology auditable, longitudinal framing for a moving Internet, arguing limitations rather than reciting them, writing the Ethics section early, and acmart page-budget discipline.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- icdm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical evaluation for an ICDM (IEEE International Conference on Data Mining) paper - mining-task definition, strong and fairly-tuned baselines, ablations that isolate the named mechanism, scalability curves that test scale claims, and discovery-validity checks that separate real findings from evaluation artifacts.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pods-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the analytical "evidence" of an ACM PODS paper — worst-case and average-case analyses, matching upper and lower bounds, dichotomy completeness, correct complexity assumptions, and the occasional empirical validation when a theory paper claims practicality — matching the rigor to the shape of each theoretical claim.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- popl-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing the empirical component of a POPL paper — deciding whether evidence should be a mechanization, a prototype, case studies, or benchmarks; reporting proof effort and case-study coverage honestly; and keeping performance numbers in a supporting role so the formal claim stays the paper's center of gravity.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vldb-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning a VLDB project on the PVLDB rolling calendar, covering month-picking strategy, the volume-to-conference mapping and acceptance cutoff, budgeting a possible three-month revision, coordinating author caps across a group, and backward planning from the 25th-abstract / 1st-paper rhythm.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- sosp-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a SOSP paper — mapping every claim to an experiment, choosing baselines a systems PC will accept as fair, mixing microbenchmarks with end-to-end and failure runs, reporting tails and overheads honestly, and isolating the mechanism the design credits.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- asc-cli-usagerorkai/app-store-connect-cli-skillsGuidance for using asc cli in this repo (flags, output formats, pagination, auth, and discovery). Use when asked to run or design asc commands or interact with App Store Connect via the CLI.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,1 K↓ —
- aaai-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ase-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research submission is evaluated, covering double-anonymous review, the early-rejection stage before rebuttal, the Accept / Revision / Reject outcomes, the criteria-bound revision round, and how ASE's process differs from FSE's PACMSE Major Revision, ICSE's cycles, and ISSTA's rounds.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- miglioradagoSte/squadraImprove a project's development workflow from observed failures, repeated work and avoidable waits. Apply scoped, verified remedies and useful project instructions, then automatically commit owned changes when the project's required checks and reviews are complete. Use after recurring development friction or when asked to improve the process; do not add rules without evidence.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- vldb-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a VLDB paper, covering workload and dataset realism at scale, competitor tuning fairness, scalability curves versus single points, tail-latency and throughput reporting, ablations that isolate the mechanism, and the loss-case disclosure PVLDB reviewers look for first.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cikm-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when turning an accepted CIKM paper into its ACM proceedings version inside the short notification-to-camera-ready window, covering de-anonymization, the e-rights and TAPS pipeline into the ACM Digital Library, CCS concepts and metadata, GenAI-disclosure retention, artifact link publication, and Rome presentation logistics.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- atc-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) submission is evaluated — the two-round extended-abstract model, the round-one gate by two reviewers, the round-two read by 3-4 reviewers, double-blind reviewing, rebuttal, conditional acceptance with shepherding, and how ATC differs from OSDI/SOSP/NSDI.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- runway-plannermohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsTurn burn and cash into a clear runway picture and a raise decision — months left, default-alive vs default-dead, and what to cut or change. Use when asked to calculate runway, model burn rate, decide when to raise, figure out if the company is default-alive, or plan a scenario with hiring/cuts. Produces the runway math, a default-alive verdict, and dated trigger points for raising or acting. Not financial advice.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- howto-section-generatorkostja94/marketing-skillsDeprecated compatibility entry for How-to Section construction. This component is now maintained in Bricks; install and use component-builder to build a new How-to Section.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,1 K↓ —
- gentle-ai-cognitive-doc-designGentleman-Programming/gentle-shellDesign docs that reduce cognitive load. Trigger: writing guides, READMEs, RFCs, onboarding, architecture, or review-facing docs.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —
- brooks-testActualizathyhmrright/brooks-lintTest quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow execution, poor readability. Triggers when: user asks about test quality, shares test files for review, or expresses frustration: "tests keep breaking whenever I change anything", "our tests take forever", "tests pass but bugs still reach production", or "we have too many mocks". Do NOT trigger for: writing new tests from scratch (use the regular test-writing workflow) or testing framework/syntax questions — this skill reviews an existing suite for structural quality problems, not individual test authoring.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —
ai-model-nodejs
TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-AI-Toolkit
ActualizatBrowserActualizat acum 10 ore
De la autor
Use this skill for Node.js backend AI via @cloudbase/node-sdk (>=3.16.0) — cloud functions, CloudRun, Express/Koa/NestJS, serverless APIs, scheduled jobs, LLM proxies, agent orchestration. The only SDK supporting image generation (ai.createImageModel + generateImage). Text via ai.createModel with groups cloudbase, the legacy hunyuan-v3 / hunyuan-exp, or custom-*; model ids (e.g. deepseek-v4.1-flash, glm-5.3, kimi-k2.6) go in the `model` field of generateText/streamText. MUST run two-step preflight before code — see body. NOT for browser/Web (use ai-model-web) or Mini Program (use ai-model-wechat).
Instalare
npx skills add TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-AI-Toolkit --skill ai-model-nodejs -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/ai-model-nodejs/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniFolosește rețeauaLicență: MIT
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență77
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție50
Fișiere (4)
- LICENSE.md
- SKILL.md
- references/api-reference.md
- references/custom-onboarding.md