Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.492 de skill-uri din 2.391 de depozite · actualizat acum 2 ore
49.492 de skill-uri
- popl-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing the empirical component of a POPL paper — deciding whether evidence should be a mechanization, a prototype, case studies, or benchmarks; reporting proof effort and case-study coverage honestly; and keeping performance numbers in a supporting role so the formal claim stays the paper's center of gravity.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- rss-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsJournal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包，从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程，助你快速发论文。PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- speak-human-twRaymondhou0917/speak-human-tw「說人話」：繁體中文的去 AI 味改寫 skill。審查與改寫文字，去除 AI 味道、校正中國用語與半形標點，讓文字讀起來像真人寫的。 觸發時機：用戶說「去 AI 味」「說人話」「這段好 AI」「改自然一點」「幫我潤稿去掉 AI 感」「校對一下再發」，或要求檢查電子報、社群貼文、銷售頁、課程文案、客服回信、簡報、公告、Email 等對外文字的語感。 不要觸發：逐字翻譯、模仿特定品牌 voice、事實查核（非風格問題）、程式碼／log／設定檔、要求「潤成雷蒙的語氣」（那是 content-writing skill 的事，本 skill 只去 AI 味、不加個人風格）。RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,1 K↓ —
- ipsn-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing IPSN-lineage evaluations, covering real testbeds and deployments, ground-truth instrumentation, energy/latency/footprint measurement on real hardware, on-device/TinyML profiling, estimation-theoretic baselines and bounds, and matching evidence to the shape of each sensing claim across the IP and SPOTS tracks.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- lancet-writingbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to structure and hold the length of a Lancet Article main text — Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion (~3000–3500 words), the Research in context panel, a limited reference list (~30), and a cautious, globally minded Discussion that does not overstate.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- imc-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when drafting or revising the prose of an ACM IMC measurement paper, covering the first-page measurement finding, making vantage points and methodology auditable, longitudinal framing for a moving Internet, arguing limitations rather than reciting them, writing the Ethics section early, and acmart page-budget discipline.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- icse-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an ICSE research-track paper, covering subject and benchmark selection, baseline fairness, statistical tests and effect sizes as SE reviewers expect them, qualitative-methods rigor, ablations for AI-based techniques, and threats-driven study design.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- icdm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical evaluation for an ICDM (IEEE International Conference on Data Mining) paper - mining-task definition, strong and fairly-tuned baselines, ablations that isolate the named mechanism, scalability curves that test scale claims, and discovery-validity checks that separate real findings from evaluation artifacts.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- icra-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the experimental section of an ICRA paper — real-robot versus simulation-only evidence, trial counts and success-rate reporting, task distributions and resets, baseline fairness on shared hardware, sim-to-real transfer claims, failure-mode analysis, and the statistics robotics reviewers actually expect.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- focs-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding whether and how computation appears in a FOCS (IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science) paper — a venue that accepts on theorems with no evaluation section expected — covering machine-verified case analyses, computer-discovered constructions, and honest illustrative plots.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- hri-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning the supplementary materials for an ACM/IEEE HRI full paper — above all the video figure that shows the embodied interaction, plus study instruments, extended results, and appendices — deciding what a reviewer must see to judge the interaction versus what belongs outside the 8-page body, all anonymized for double-blind review.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- minutes-live-sidekicksilverstein/minutesAct as the user's live meeting sidekick inside the current terminal agent session. Use when the user explicitly asks you, the terminal agent, to watch a meeting, follow the live transcript, answer during the call, offer strategist thoughts, silently watch for risks, or track decisions. Do not use this skill to start or control the separate Minutes Coach HUD; explicit Coach or HUD lifecycle requests belong to minutes-copilot, and an ambiguous request such as "coach me live" requires one short surface clarification.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
- fse-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in an ESEC/FSE paper body versus its anonymized artifact and appendices, covering the ACM-template page budget, the rule that decision-critical evidence stays inside the reviewed pages, double-anonymous supplementary material, and how to split an empirical-SE paper between body and package.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cvpr-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the experimental program of a CVPR paper, covering benchmark and baseline selection under matched-compute fairness, the ablation study reviewers treat as mandatory, qualitative and failure-case evidence, efficiency metrics tied to the Compute Reporting Form, and generalization tests beyond a single dataset.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- openmeld-cliamplifthq/openmeldUse OpenMeld when a task needs Organization knowledge or Skills, Center Agent help, shared Spaces or Files, another Agent or computer, or scheduled cloud work. Also use for OpenMeld setup and Wake replies.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —Apare și în 3 alte depozite
- dac-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when drafting or tightening the prose of an ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) Research Manuscript, covering the QoR-forward first-page arc, stating the design-automation contribution as a measured delta, fitting a complete argument into six double-column pages plus a references-only page, building column-width EDA figures, and third-person self-citation for double-blind review.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- where-to-start-situation-savegooseworks-ai/goose-skillsStep of the where-to-start playbook: saves the founder's answers and the agreed first move with the brand, so later visits and other playbooks don't ask again. Run where-to-start instead; not for direct use.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- write-outreachgooseworks-ai/goose-skillsCold outreach a person sends to business buyers: email and LinkedIn sequences, a first line per prospect, reply and objection answers, and a read of replies. Use when the marketer says "write a cold email sequence", "what do I send to this list", "write LinkedIn messages for these leads", "how do I reply to this prospect" or "handle this objection", "reply to this demo request", "win back or reconnect with accounts that churned or went quiet", or "why is nobody replying to my outreach". Drafts only; the marketer sends from their own tool. Not for finding the people — use research-audience; not for emails to subscribers or users, or consumer win-back — use email-lifecycle.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- eacl-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical evidence for an EACL paper, covering tuned and LLM baselines, multilingual breadth matched to the claim, significance and variance floors, human-evaluation agreement, data-contamination controls, ablations, and error taxonomies, so that every stated result is measured rather than asserted.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- icml-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an ICML main-track submission for OpenReview, LaTeX formatting, 8-page body, anonymity, supplementary material, impact statement, dual submission, concurrent ICML submissions, reciprocal reviewing, and LLM/prompt-injection policy compliance.JuridicFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- iclr-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an ICLR main-conference submission for OpenReview readiness, double-blind anonymity, page limits, reciprocal reviewing, LLM-use disclosure, dual-submission policy, supplementary material, and desk-reject risk.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ijcai-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an IJCAI or IJCAI-ECAI project timeline from venue fit through abstract registration, full-paper upload, author information, PPI payment, summary-reject risk, author response, notification, camera-ready, in-person presentation, and artifact release.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- imc-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when writing or auditing the related-work and positioning of an ACM IMC paper, covering the measurement literature lanes, positioning against prior datasets and vantage points, delta-first framing, citing the datasets and tools you build on, distinguishing IMC from SIGCOMM/NSDI/PAM prior art, and keeping self-citations double-blind.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- icse-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an ICSE research-track submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the mandatory abstract deadline, the 10-page-plus-2-reference-page IEEE format, double-anonymous rules, the open-science Data Availability section, supplementary uploads, and desk-reject triage before the AoE cutoff.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
pmla-workflow
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
ProductivitateActualizat 27 sept. 2026
De la autor
Use as the entry point for any PMLA (Publications of the Modern Language Association) manuscript. Routes to the right PMLA sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and which venue fits — a regular blind-reviewed article or a special feature (Theories and Methodologies, The Changing Profession, Criticism in Translation, Little-known Documents). It dispatches; it does not draft content.
Instalare
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill pmla-workflow -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/pmla-workflow/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: MIT
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență77
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție50
Fișiere (1)
- SKILL.md