Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.492 de skill-uri din 2.391 de depozite · actualizat acum 3 ore
49.492 de skill-uri
- cav-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) submission against the verification literature across CAV, TACAS, FMCAD, VMCAI, POPL/PLDI, and the journals (FMSD, JAR, TOCL, STTT), writing delta-first contrast rather than a citation catalog, crediting the right benchmark and tool lineages, keeping self-citations double-anonymous for the anonymized categories, and handling concurrent and prior-version overlap.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cikm-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a CIKM submission for EasyChair readiness across the five tracks, covering page budgets with appendices counted inside, the mandatory GenAI Usage Disclosure section, author-reviewer nomination, double-blind rules with arXiv declaration, the abstract-gate authorship freeze, and desk-reject triggers.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- chi-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing an accepted ACM CHI paper for publication — the TAPS source upload, the PCS publication-ready package, mandatory accessibility work (alt text, screen-reader-friendly PDFs, table headers), video previews, ACM's open-access model, e-rights, and registration deadlines.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- chi-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when building the related-work section of an ACM CHI paper — covering the HCI venue family and the non-CS disciplines CHI draws on, positioning against the last few CHI cycles, keeping self-citation anonymous — in a venue where insufficient contextualization is the top assisted desk-reject ground.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ase-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when writing the related-work and positioning of an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) paper, covering the automated-SE literature lanes, delta-first positioning against prior tools/techniques, fair head-to-head framing, and double-anonymous self-citation.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ccs-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ACM CCS project timeline across the two HotCRP review cycles, from venue fit through abstract registration, full-paper upload, rebuttal, notification, revision, artifact evaluation, ACM camera-ready, and in-person presentation, with backward-planning offsets and the security big-four deadline-hopping calendar.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ase-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing the ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) camera-ready after acceptance or a successful revision, covering systematic de-anonymization, the extra content page, the mandatory Data Availability finalization, the correct IEEE/ACM template and metadata, permanentized artifact links, and dual IEEE-Xplore/ACM-DL production checks.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- atc-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing the ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) camera-ready after a conditional accept — de-anonymizing systematically, folding in the shepherd's required revisions, permanentizing artifact links, completing ACM Open Access metadata and the transition APC, and passing production checks for the November Hong Kong proceedings.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- aamas-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an AAMAS project timeline from venue fit through abstract, full-paper or extended-abstract upload, supplementary material, the double-blind rebuttal, decision, IFAAMAS camera-ready, registration, and presentation, with track-specific deadlines and backward-planning offsets for a game-theory-plus-experiments paper.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- sci-writingbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when choosing the Science (AAAS) format (Research Article vs Report) and holding its length and structure budgets — main-text word caps, figure caps, argument-ordered Results, and deciding what belongs in the main text versus Supplementary Materials.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- sci-figuresbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to finalize Science display items — panel/word budget, column-width sizing, minimum font sizes, color-accessibility, and showing the data (points over bars). Enforces figure rigor before submission.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- nejm-reportingbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to select and enforce the correct EQUATOR reporting guideline for a clinical study headed to NEJM — CONSORT for RCTs (with the participant flow diagram), STROBE for observational, PRISMA for systematic reviews — and to build the required checklist and diagram before submission.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- aaai-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an AAAI main technical track submission for OpenReview readiness, double-blind anonymity, page limits, reproducibility checklist, supplementary material, author limits, multiple-submission policy, and AAAI AI-use policy compliance.JuridicFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- web-perffcakyon/claude-codex-settingsAudit, diagnose, or optimize website loading and interaction performance, Core Web Vitals, and Lighthouse performance scores.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,2 K↓ —
- sci-framingbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when locking the conceptual advance and the "why now" before drafting for Science (AAAS) — converts a correct result into a Science-shaped narrative that leads with the broad advance rather than the background, and seeds the title, abstract, and cover letter.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- uai-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing UAI experiments where inference quality is the endpoint, covering calibration and coverage measurement, posterior diagnostics, structure-recovery metrics for causal and graphical models, seeded repeated runs, baselines from both sampling and optimization families, and mapping each claim to its evidence.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cav-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) empirical evaluation, covering standard benchmark sets (SV-COMP/SMT-COMP/HWMCC/VNN-COMP), fair baseline solvers with pinned versions and equal resource limits, timeout-dominated comparisons, soundness cross-checks and proof witnesses, cactus/scatter reporting, and matching evidence to the shape of each verification claim.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- jama-scope-fitbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when judging whether a clinical study clears JAMA's general-medical-importance bar before investing in a full submission. Assesses fit and article-type match; it does NOT design the study or write the paper.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- dac-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical evaluation of an ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) Research Manuscript, covering standard EDA benchmark suites (ISPD, EPFL, ISCAS/ITC, TAU, CircuitNet, OpenROAD flows), fair state-of-the-art baselines, QoR/PPA reporting with runtime, per-benchmark honesty, ablations that isolate the mechanism, and contamination-aware ML-for-EDA evaluation.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- hri-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the human-subjects study at the heart of an ACM/IEEE HRI full paper — choosing between/within-subjects designs, running Wizard-of-Oz honestly, powering the sample, reporting statistics with effect sizes and qualitative rigor, selecting validated scales, adding manipulation checks, pre-registering, and meeting HRI's human-participants ethics obligations.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- chi-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the studies behind an ACM CHI paper — matching evidence shape to contribution type, powering quantitative experiments, making qualitative work rigorous and auditable, reporting participants and ethics properly, and avoiding the ADR-Data and ADR-Method screening grounds.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- supabasefcakyon/claude-codex-settingsUse when doing ANY task involving Supabase. Triggers: Supabase products (Database, Auth, Edge Functions, Realtime, Storage, Vectors, Cron, Queues); client libraries and SSR integrations (supabase-js, @supabase/ssr) in Next.js, React, SvelteKit, Astro, Remix; auth issues (login, logout, sessions, JWT, cookies, getSession, getUser, getClaims, RLS); Supabase CLI or MCP server; schema changes, migrations, declarative schemas, security audits, Postgres extensions (pg_graphql, pg_cron, pg_vector); debugging and troubleshooting errors or unexpected behavior on Supabase projects (HTTP errors, Postgres errors, RLS surprises, permission denied, schema cache issues, timeouts, Edge Function crashes, Realtime drops, Storage failures) and reading or querying logs (Logs Explorer, ClickHouse).SecuritateFără avertismente★ 1,2 K↓ —
- daily-journalhuytieu/COG-second-brainA passive daily work journal that Claude keeps FOR you so you never have to write it yourself. Append short entries after meaningful work (what was done, what you focused on, artifacts touched) to 01-daily/journal/YYYY-MM-DD.md. Run a guided reflection at night or in the morning. Use when you run /daily-journal, say "log this to my journal", "add to today's journal", "reflect on today/yesterday", or when finishing a meaningful chunk of work in any session.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
- closed-loophuytieu/COG-second-brainRun one task through the V-model verification loop: CP-2 plan → CP-3 build → CP-3v component verify → CP-4 integration verify (full lane) → CP-5 acceptance. The worker never grades its own homework; evidence rows trace back to AC-n. Opt-in: invoke with /closed-loop or by asking for the closed loop, proper verification, or an evidence trail. Ordinary work does not run this.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
wiki-summary
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
ProductivitateActualizat acum 10 ore
De la autor
Fetch Wikipedia's current summary of any topic with zero API keys — the REST summary endpoint via curl, for answers that need today's article rather than training-data memory. Use when asked what does Wikipedia say about X, get me the current summary of a topic, check a fact against Wikipedia, or has this article changed. Produces the live extract with the article link, disambiguation handling, and a clean separation between what Wikipedia says and what the model adds.
Instalare
npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill wiki-summary -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/wiki-summary/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniFolosește rețeauaLicență: MIT
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență78
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție51
Fișiere (1)
- SKILL.md