Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.501 skill-uri din 2.391 de depozite · actualizat acum 33 de minute
49.501 skill-uri
- ndss-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when performing the final pre-upload audit of an NDSS submission — HotCRP fields, the AoE deadline, NDSS template and 13-page compliance, double-blind sweep, ethics readiness, the six-per-author cap, overlap rules, and desk-reject triage in the last week.JuridicFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- research-competitorsgooseworks-ai/goose-skillsCompetitor research: what every main rival is running, launching, charging and saying now, what works for them, and what that means for you. Use when the marketer asks for competitor research or a teardown, "what ads are my competitors running", "how do they price", "find gaps and angles", "what changed this week" (a weekly watch), or "X just launched / shut down / cut prices" (react now). Also builds a sales battlecard, checks a competitor page's tools/pixels, or studies who engages with their LinkedIn posts. Delivers a readable report saved to the brand, so the next run reports what changed. Never copies their words or disparages them. Not for what people say about you or your market — use research-market; not for who your buyers are — use research-audience.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- metric-designagentscope-ai/OpenJudgeUse when the user has evaluation principles or a dataset but needs help choosing the right graders, designing evaluation metrics, creating LLM-as-judge prompts, combining multiple metrics into a composite score, or building an automated evaluation pipeline. Also use when the user mentions grader selection, metric design, judge prompt engineering, rubric design, evaluation pipeline code, or "how to evaluate [X] automatically." Outputs executable OpenJudge pipeline code.DesignFără avertismente★ 1 K↓ —
- cikm-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when turning an accepted CIKM paper into its ACM proceedings version inside the short notification-to-camera-ready window, covering de-anonymization, the e-rights and TAPS pipeline into the ACM Digital Library, CCS concepts and metadata, GenAI-disclosure retention, artifact link publication, and Rome presentation logistics.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- asplos-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ASPLOS campaign across the two-deadline cycle — sequencing evidence building, the September 9, 2026 submission gate, author-response windows, the December 21 notification, Major Revision resubmission six weeks later, artifact evaluation, and the April 2027 conference in Crete, with owners per risk.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- atc-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) submission is evaluated — the two-round extended-abstract model, the round-one gate by two reviewers, the round-two read by 3-4 reviewers, double-blind reviewing, rebuttal, conditional acceptance with shepherding, and how ATC differs from OSDI/SOSP/NSDI.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cav-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) submission is evaluated, covering the two-stage reviewing process (two reviews then an early-reject filter, then two more reviews with a rebuttal), the partial double-anonymity by category, the accept/reject outcome, the optional non-conditional artifact evaluation, and how CAV differs from TACAS and FMCAD.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ase-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research submission is evaluated, covering double-anonymous review, the early-rejection stage before rebuttal, the Accept / Revision / Reject outcomes, the criteria-bound revision round, and how ASE's process differs from FSE's PACMSE Major Revision, ICSE's cycles, and ISSTA's rounds.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vis-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising an IEEE VIS paper for a task-grounded visualization contribution on the first page, a design rationale that ties each visual encoding and interaction to a task, evaluation matched to the contribution type, honest limitations, and disciplined use of the VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget for a paper that will be read as an IEEE TVCG journal article.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vldb-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a VLDB paper, covering workload and dataset realism at scale, competitor tuning fairness, scalability curves versus single points, tail-latency and throughput reporting, ablations that isolate the mechanism, and the loss-case disclosure PVLDB reviewers look for first.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- aaai-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- aaai-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- wsdm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a WSDM paper - offline ranking and recommendation metrics with bias controls, temporal-split protocols for interaction logs, baseline selection from recent WSDM/SIGIR/KDD editions, ablations that isolate the mechanism, efficiency reporting, and online-evidence framing.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- sosp-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a SOSP paper — mapping every claim to an experiment, choosing baselines a systems PC will accept as fair, mixing microbenchmarks with end-to-end and failure runs, reporting tails and overheads honestly, and isolating the mechanism the design credits.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vis-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in an IEEE VIS paper body versus its supplemental materials, covering the VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget, the supplemental video that VIS reviewers routinely watch, the one-week supplemental deadline extension, double-blind supplemental anonymization, and how to split a visualization paper between the reviewed pages and the archive.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- socc-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing ACM SoCC evaluations, covering real or realistic deployments over simulation, production or representative workloads and traces, tail-latency and cost as first-class metrics, fair tuned baselines, scale and multi-tenancy behavior, reproducible measurement pipelines, and matching evidence to the shape of each cloud claim.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- popl-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing the empirical component of a POPL paper — deciding whether evidence should be a mechanization, a prototype, case studies, or benchmarks; reporting proof effort and case-study coverage honestly; and keeping performance numbers in a supporting role so the formal claim stays the paper's center of gravity.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pods-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the analytical "evidence" of an ACM PODS paper — worst-case and average-case analyses, matching upper and lower bounds, dichotomy completeness, correct complexity assumptions, and the occasional empirical validation when a theory paper claims practicality — matching the rigor to the shape of each theoretical claim.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pldi-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing a PLDI evaluation — choosing defensible benchmark suites and baseline compiler configurations, measuring runtime, compile time, and memory with warmup and variance discipline, running ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism, and scoping claims to the platforms measured.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- rss-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsJournal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包，从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程，助你快速发论文。PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- kdd-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising a KDD paper into the venue's register, where the first page names a data regime, a mechanism, and scale evidence, efficiency adjectives trace to design decisions, and two-column sigconf pages punish sprawl. Covers Research vs ADS voice, dataset-size discipline, assertive contribution bullets, and 8-page compression.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- lancet-writingbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to structure and hold the length of a Lancet Article main text — Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion (~3000–3500 words), the Research in context panel, a limited reference list (~30), and a cautious, globally minded Discussion that does not overstate.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- where-to-startgooseworks-ai/goose-skillsFirst-move advice for a broad growth or marketing ask with no job named: looks at what GooseWorks already knows and at the site, asks a few short questions in one message, names the one thing in the way, and sends the marketer to the right next job. Use when the marketer says "help me grow my brand", "I need to grow my business", "how do I get more customers / sales", "help me with marketing", "where do I start", "sales are flat", "what should I focus on this month", or "I'm back, what's next?". Recommends only; never runs the work. Not for a named job like "make me ads" or "grow my Instagram" (go straight to it); not for a campaign with a launch, budget or date — use plan-campaign; not for why this week's numbers moved — use analyze-performance.MarketingFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- oma-scmfirst-fluke/oh-my-agentManage Git branches, merges, conflicts, commits, and release baselines. Use for repository history and change-management operations.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —Apare și în 3 alte depozite
gcloud-usage
fcakyon/claude-codex-settings
DevOpsActualizat acum 7 ore
De la autor
This skill should be used when user asks about "GCloud logs", "Cloud Logging queries", "Google Cloud metrics", "GCP observability", "trace analysis", or "debugging production issues on GCP".
Instalare
npx skills add fcakyon/claude-codex-settings --skill gcloud-usage -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/gcloud-usage/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: APACHE-2.0
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență77
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție50
Fișiere (1)
- SKILL.md