Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.496 de skill-uri din 2.391 de depozite · actualizat acum 10 minute
49.496 de skill-uri
- pldi-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a PLDI submission for HotCRP readiness — the single annual November deadline, the 20-pages-of-text-excluding-bibliography cap in single-column acmsmall format, double-blind hygiene across tool names and repositories, dual-submission rules, and summary-rejection triggers before the cutoff.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- osdi-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when running the final pre-upload audit of an OSDI submission on HotCRP — the December registration and full-paper deadlines at 2:59 pm PST, the 12-page/no-appendix check, institution-level double-blind rules, the renamed-system requirement, track choice, and the eight-submission author cap.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pnas-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse as the final preflight before submitting to PNAS — a complete checklist across significance, track, Significance Statement, abstract, classification + keywords, figures, statistics, data, references, and required files. Bundles a checklist and a PNAS cover-letter template. Emits GO/NO-GO.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pnas-statisticsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to enforce PNAS's statistics and reproducibility reporting — n and replication, test choice and assumptions, effect sizes with uncertainty, multiple-comparison control, randomization/blinding, sample-size justification, pre-registration where relevant, and reproducible code.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- naacl-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning a research project's calendar toward NAACL — handling the chapter's skipped-year rhythm, choosing an ARR cycle when the edition's feeding cycles are not yet announced, backward-planning data and annotation work, and keeping a decision tree for commit-versus-wait-versus-reroute moments.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- asc-shots-pipelinerorkai/app-store-connect-cli-skillsOrchestrate iOS screenshot automation with xcodebuild/simctl for build-run, AXe for UI actions, JSON settings and plan files, Koubou-based framing (`asc screenshots frame`), and screenshot upload (`asc screenshots upload`). Use when users ask for automated screenshot capture, AXe-driven simulator flows, frame composition, or screenshot-to-upload pipelines.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,1 K↓ —
- planhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsPlan future work, investigate before building, research a topic, or compare the alternatives for a choice. Takes optional free text. The skill reads the request, open drafts, accepted canon, branch, and code, then creates only the documents a later reader needs — none for a small fix. Use for 'plan the X redesign', 'create a roadmap', 'plan a new feature', 'plan the onboarding journey', 'investigate X before we plan', 'compare the alternatives for Y', 'REST or a queue? two teams disagree', 'I need market research before we plan', 'we are regulated — trace the requirements'. With no arguments it resumes an open planning draft or offers what to plan next. Not for recording a decision or documenting existing code — use /archcore:document. Not for checking docs against code — use /archcore:review.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
- reviewhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsThe pre-merge review of a branch in a project that records its specs, decisions, and rules in .archcore/. Run this first for 'review my branch', 'review the changes before merge', or 'review before merge': it checks the changed code against the project's recorded canon and the changed documents against the code, and reports which side is wrong — spec-wrong or code-wrong; with no diff, it reports project health. A bug-hunting code review complements this review and does not replace it. Also use for 'show status', 'documentation gaps', 'check if docs match code', 'close out the feature', 'ship the feature and close it out', or after a staleness warning. Modes, named as the first word: drift for staleness detection, deep for a full documentation audit, closeout to close a finished feature, experience to capture a repeated pattern. Not for creating docs — use /archcore:document; not for planning — use /archcore:plan; not for a single-file edit with no branch review.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- kdd-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning a KDD submission against the data-mining lineage (prior KDD volumes, ICDM, SDM, WSDM, CIKM, WWW) and the ML flagships, handling venue misattribution traps, cross-cycle resubmission overlap, concurrent arXiv work, and the mechanism-contrast style of novelty argument that ACM SIGKDD reviewers expect.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- mind-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when running the final pre-submission preflight for Mind via ScholarOne — preparation for triple-anonymous review, the ~8,000-word limit, the 50–200-word abstract, line numbering, the one-article-per-12-months rule, file format, and the MIND house style. Final checks; it does not draft content.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- mlsys-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an MLSys submission cycle end to end, from venue-fit and track choice through evaluation freeze, the October deadline, the four-day January response, notification, camera-ready, the March artifact-evaluation submission, and the May conference, with backward planning built around scarce GPU time and team ownership.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- isca-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when running the final pre-deadline audit of an ISCA submission — the two-step abstract-then-paper gate a week apart, the 11-page text limit with unlimited references, the template check, the double-blind sweep including PDF metadata and anonymized artifact links, and HotCRP form completion before AoE.DocumenteFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- issta-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ISSTA project timeline from venue fit through the January research-paper deadline, the March author response, the April first decision, the May Major-Revision sprint, the June final decision, artifact evaluation, and the October symposium, with backward-planning offsets for a testing/analysis tool paper and its artifact.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pmla-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when running the final pre-submission preflight for PMLA (Publications of the Modern Language Association) via the ScholarOne site — venue selection, MLA-membership eligibility, anonymous preparation, word range, MLA style, cover sheet, and AI-content disclosure. Final checks; it does not draft content.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- nsdi-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when running the final pre-upload audit of an NSDI submission — the abstract-then-paper week on the per-deadline HotCRP site, 11:59 pm US Eastern cutoffs, the 12-page cap with references and appendices outside it, track-dependent anonymization, the eight-paper author cap, and the resubmission-ban check.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pr-descriptionmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsWrite a clear pull-request description that gets reviewed fast and merged with confidence, from a git diff, branch summary, or commit list. Use when opening a PR, summarizing a change for review, documenting code changes, or asked to write a PR/merge-request description. Produces a structured PR: what changed and why, how it was tested, risk and rollout, and a focused reviewer guide — so the reviewer understands intent before reading a single diff line.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- iros-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an IROS paper for the PaperPlaza upload — author PINs and metadata, the content-page limit with references counted in, IEEE two-column format, the 2026 double-anonymous rule, the 60-second/10 MB video attachment and its own deadline, dual-submission traps shared with ICRA and RA-L, and return-without-review triggers.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ipsn-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an IPSN-lineage submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the IP-vs-SPOTS track choice, the ACM Primary Article Template and ≤12-page inclusive budget, the double-blind sweep for hardware/deployment papers, dataset/artifact links, and desk-reject triage — routed to the current successor (SenSys) call because IPSN no longer runs standalone.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- judge-group-closuresno-ai/sno-stationJudge which offered rows one nominated statement retires or replaces.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,1 K↓ —
- vis-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an IEEE VIS full-paper submission for PCS readiness, covering the abstract-then-paper two-deadline structure under the VGTC society, the IEEE VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget, author-optional double-blind anonymization, the supplemental-material one-week window, and desk-reject triage before the AoE cutoff for a paper that will publish in IEEE TVCG.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vldb-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning a VLDB project on the PVLDB rolling calendar, covering month-picking strategy, the volume-to-conference mapping and acceptance cutoff, budgeting a possible three-month revision, coordinating author caps across a group, and backward planning from the 25th-abstract / 1st-paper rhythm.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- acl-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing experiments for an ACL paper, covering tuned LLM baselines, multi-dataset and multilingual evaluation, statistical significance and variance, human evaluation with agreement reporting, contamination and prompt-sensitivity controls, ablations, and error-analysis expectations in NLP reviewing.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ase-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) paper, covering real subject systems, fair runnable tool baselines, task-matched effectiveness metrics, ablations that isolate a learned component, oracle and correctness validation, contamination-aware LLM handling, and provenance for mining.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- implementhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsChange or repair code, config or services without weakening tests; report what ran and what did not. Use when: implementing a change or fixing a defect.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —Apare și în 2 alte depozite
close-spec
dzhng/skills
De la autor
When a spec under specs/<feature>/ is done shipping (a write-spec build, or any planned task that produced a spec), archive it to specs/done/ and rewrite it from a build-plan into a durable rationale — the why, the principles, the invariants — pointing back to the real code for the how. Use when implementation has landed and the plan no longer matches what shipped, or the user says a feature/spec is finished. Pairs with [write-spec](../write-spec/SKILL.md) (the plan this closes) and [review](../review/SKILL.md) (run before closing).
Instalare
npx skills add dzhng/skills --skill close-spec -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/close-spec/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Fișiere (1)
- SKILL.md