Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
48.622 de skill-uri din 2.355 de depozite · actualizat acum 10 ore
47.548 de skill-uri
- socc-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing ACM SoCC evaluations, covering real or realistic deployments over simulation, production or representative workloads and traces, tail-latency and cost as first-class metrics, fair tuned baselines, scale and multi-tenancy behavior, reproducible measurement pipelines, and matching evidence to the shape of each cloud claim.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- stoc-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when judging whether computation belongs in a STOC (ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing) paper at all — STOC accepts on theorems, with no empirical-evaluation expectation — and when it does, scoping it as certified proof computation, constructive search, or clearly labeled illustration rather than benchmarking.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- imc-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in an ACM IMC paper body versus its appendix and released artifact, covering the acmart page limits, the rule that decision-critical evidence and the Ethics discussion stay in the reviewed pages, double-blind supplementary material, and how to split a measurement paper between body, appendix, and dataset.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- pods-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the analytical "evidence" of an ACM PODS paper — worst-case and average-case analyses, matching upper and lower bounds, dichotomy completeness, correct complexity assumptions, and the occasional empirical validation when a theory paper claims practicality — matching the rigor to the shape of each theoretical claim.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- pldi-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing a PLDI evaluation — choosing defensible benchmark suites and baseline compiler configurations, measuring runtime, compile time, and memory with warmup and variance discipline, running ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism, and scoping claims to the platforms measured.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- popl-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing the empirical component of a POPL paper — deciding whether evidence should be a mechanization, a prototype, case studies, or benchmarks; reporting proof effort and case-study coverage honestly; and keeping performance numbers in a supporting role so the formal claim stays the paper's center of gravity.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- gentle-ai-cognitive-doc-designGentleman-Programming/gentle-shellDesign docs that reduce cognitive load. Trigger: writing guides, READMEs, RFCs, onboarding, architecture, or review-facing docs.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- rss-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsJournal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包，从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程，助你快速发论文。PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- cav-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper for a precise verification contribution on the first page, an explicit soundness/completeness statement, theorem-and-proof discipline in the LNCS page budget, fair benchmark claims, honest scope and limits, and double-blind wording for the anonymized categories.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- colt-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding whether a COLT (Conference on Learning Theory) paper needs numerical content at all — COLT has no experiments requirement — and, when numerics genuinely help, designing small illustrative simulations that visualize a proved bound, a separation, or a phase transition without diluting the theory.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- colm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical core of a COLM paper — contamination analysis for evaluation data, fair baselines under matched prompting and compute, pinned model versions and decoding parameters, uncertainty over runs and samples, scaling coverage, and honest reporting of API-model comparisons.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- acl-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ACL paper travels through ACL Rolling Review and conference commitment, covering reviewer and area-chair roles, meta-reviews, the commitment decision by senior area chairs and program chairs, Findings versus main-conference outcomes, ethics review escalation, and resubmission strategy across cycles.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- ase-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when shaping the prose and structure of an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research paper, covering the automation-first first-page arc, stating the automated task precisely, keeping the tool runnable and the model-swap test in mind, threats-as-argument, and the 10+2 page discipline on the ACM acmart template.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- acl-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising an ACL paper for computational-linguistics house style, covering task-first framing, linguistic examples tied to quantitative error analysis, scoping language claims to tested languages, LLM-era claim discipline, anonymous self-reference, Limitations prose, and compressing into the 8-page or 4-page ACL format.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- ase-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in the 10-page ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) paper body versus the artifact and supplementary material, splitting content by decision-criticality so nothing that decides acceptance lives outside the reviewed pages under the 10+2 budget.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- sox-itgcSushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-ComplianceExpert SOX IT General Controls (ITGC) advisor for finance, internal audit and IT compliance teams. Covers the four ITGC domains external auditors test for SOX 404 — access to programs and data, program changes, computer operations, and program development — plus scoping in-scope systems from the financial statements, designing risk-and-control matrices (RCMs), writing control narratives and test scripts, evaluating deficiencies (control deficiency vs significant deficiency vs material weakness under AS 2201 and Reg S-X), drafting remediation plans, SOX 404(a)/404(b) applicability and filer status, IPO readiness timelines, and COSO 2013 alignment. Use this skill whenever a user mentions SOX, ITGC, IT general controls, 404(a)/404(b), ICFR, material weakness, user access reviews, segregation of duties in IT, change management controls for financial systems, SOX testing or walkthroughs, PCAOB audits, or quarterly compliance for financial reporting systems.TestareFără avertismente★ 1 K↓ —
- acmmm-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning the end-to-end ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) campaign calendar — from thematic-area scoping and track choice, through the April OpenReview abstract/paper/supplement chain, the June anonymous rebuttal, the July decision, the August camera-ready, and the November presentation in Rio, with the right skill invoked at each stage.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- atc-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when drafting or revising an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — writing a self-standing two-page extended abstract for the round-one gate, structuring the implementation-and-measurement narrative, reporting costs beside gains, and holding the two-column 12-page budget.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- wacv-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a WACV submission before an OpenReview round deadline, covering the Round 1 vs Round 2 choice, the Applications vs Algorithms track field, the 8-page-including-figures limit, double-blind anonymity and OpenReview-profile requirements, the anonymized supplement, dual submission, and desk-reject triage.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- vis-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning an IEEE VIS submission against the visualization literature across TVCG, the six VIS areas, EuroVis/CGF, PacificVis, and adjacent HCI/graphics venues, writing delta-first contrast rather than a citation catalog, keeping self-citations double-blind when opted in, and handling concurrent, preprint, and prior-version overlap for a TVCG journal article.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- judge-group-closuresno-ai/sno-stationJudge which offered rows one nominated statement retires or replaces.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,1 K↓ —
- uist-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when performing the final pre-upload audit of a UIST paper in PCS — the abstract-then-paper deadline pair, 10-page/5-page two-column limits with desk-reject enforcement, anonymous acmart options, video-figure and supplementary uploads, the prior-work overlap rule, and deadline-week sequencing.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- vldb-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a PVLDB submission before a monthly deadline, covering the mandatory abstract on the 25th, the CMT window, the 1st-of-month 5:00 PM Pacific cutoff, category and page-budget choice, single-blind cover-page requirements, the per-month and per-year author caps, and desk-reject hazards specific to VLDB.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- uist-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a UIST paper — choosing among technical benchmarks, controlled comparisons, usability walkthroughs, expert sessions, and demonstration applications, matching evaluation shape to the systems claim, and avoiding the ritual study that proves nothing the paper asserts.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
interview-mapper
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
PlanificareActualizat alaltăieri
De la autor
Use when coding or making sense of one interview transcript (customer, JTBD, expert, usability, exit). Extracts verbatim-grounded nuggets with extract_nuggets.py, verifies quotes with verify_quotes.py and checks conclusions hold across reruns with consensus.py.
Instalare
npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill interview-mapper -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/interview-mapper/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Rulează scripturile incluseNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: MIT
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
- Include scripturi pe care nu le-am verificatScăzut
De ce 88
Securitate85
Proveniență94
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție69
Fișiere (97)
- SKILL.md
- assets/evals/evals.json
- assets/evals/fixtures/brand-positioning/claims.json
- assets/evals/fixtures/brand-positioning/gold.md
- assets/evals/fixtures/brand-positioning/transcript.txt
- assets/evals/fixtures/candidate/claims.json
- assets/evals/fixtures/candidate/gold.md
- assets/evals/fixtures/candidate/review-example.md
- assets/evals/fixtures/candidate/transcript.txt
- assets/evals/fixtures/change-readiness/claims.json
- assets/evals/fixtures/change-readiness/gold.md
- assets/evals/fixtures/change-readiness/transcript.txt
- încă 85