Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
48.622 de skill-uri din 2.355 de depozite · actualizat acum 2 ore
47.548 de skill-uri
- ap-roadmap-authorSpielewoy/autoprompt-skillWrite one dependency-ordered roadmap with owners, integration points, success items, and real checks.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,2 K↓ —
- openspec-update-changeMemeMeow-Studio/MemeMeowUpdate an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- openspec-update-changeMemeMeow-Studio/MemeMeowUpdate an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- openspec-apply-changeMemeMeow-Studio/MemeMeowImplement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- openspec-archive-changeMemeMeow-Studio/MemeMeowArchive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- openspec-exploreMemeMeow-Studio/MemeMeowEnter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.FinanțeFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
- ap-run-coordinatorSpielewoy/autoprompt-skillStart only ready, non-overlapping roadmap work and combine returned status at the written integration points.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,2 K↓ —
- pentest-reportmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsWrite a clear penetration-test report from findings of an authorized engagement. Use when documenting a pentest, security assessment, or authorized red-team engagement — turning findings into a report clients act on. Produces an executive summary, scope & methodology, findings with severity/evidence/reproduction/remediation, and a risk-ranked remediation plan. For authorized testing only.SecuritateFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- cold-emailalirezarezvani/claude-skillsUse for any cold outreach or SDR email or follow-up sequence to prospects who did not opt in, before drafting. Scores the sequence for length, personalization and spam risk with email_sequence_analyzer.py. Opted-in nurture: email-sequence.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 29,1 K↓ —
- using-praxishashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsUse at session start to learn how Praxis skills are invoked and why triage runs before every task.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- cikm-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when turning an accepted CIKM paper into its ACM proceedings version inside the short notification-to-camera-ready window, covering de-anonymization, the e-rights and TAPS pipeline into the ACM Digital Library, CCS concepts and metadata, GenAI-disclosure retention, artifact link publication, and Rome presentation logistics.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- pitch-vs-teachmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsKnow which talk you're giving — the pitch (drive one decision) vs. the teach (build understanding) — because mixing their structures fails both, and most bad presentations are one wearing the other's clothes. Use when asked is this a pitch or a training, my informative deck didn't land the ask, my pitch felt like a lecture, or structure this talk for the right job. Produces the mode diagnosis, the structural implications, the mixed-mandate split, and the mode-check on an existing deck.DocumenteFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- asplos-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ASPLOS campaign across the two-deadline cycle — sequencing evidence building, the September 9, 2026 submission gate, author-response windows, the December 21 notification, Major Revision resubmission six weeks later, artifact evaluation, and the April 2027 conference in Crete, with owners per risk.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- atc-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) submission is evaluated — the two-round extended-abstract model, the round-one gate by two reviewers, the round-two read by 3-4 reviewers, double-blind reviewing, rebuttal, conditional acceptance with shepherding, and how ATC differs from OSDI/SOSP/NSDI.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- cav-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) submission is evaluated, covering the two-stage reviewing process (two reviews then an early-reject filter, then two more reviews with a rebuttal), the partial double-anonymity by category, the accept/reject outcome, the optional non-conditional artifact evaluation, and how CAV differs from TACAS and FMCAD.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- ase-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research submission is evaluated, covering double-anonymous review, the early-rejection stage before rebuttal, the Accept / Revision / Reject outcomes, the criteria-bound revision round, and how ASE's process differs from FSE's PACMSE Major Revision, ICSE's cycles, and ISSTA's rounds.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- vis-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising an IEEE VIS paper for a task-grounded visualization contribution on the first page, a design rationale that ties each visual encoding and interaction to a task, evaluation matched to the contribution type, honest limitations, and disciplined use of the VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget for a paper that will be read as an IEEE TVCG journal article.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- vldb-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a VLDB paper, covering workload and dataset realism at scale, competitor tuning fairness, scalability curves versus single points, tail-latency and throughput reporting, ablations that isolate the mechanism, and the loss-case disclosure PVLDB reviewers look for first.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- wacv-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing WACV experiments, covering Applications-track systems evidence (latency, power, robustness under real constraints) versus Algorithms-track matched-baseline novelty, comparative assessment under the deployed condition, uncertainty over seeds and sessions, ablations, and evidence that survives the two-round review.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- aaai-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- aaai-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- wsdm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a WSDM paper - offline ranking and recommendation metrics with bias controls, temporal-split protocols for interaction logs, baseline selection from recent WSDM/SIGIR/KDD editions, ablations that isolate the mechanism, efficiency reporting, and online-evidence framing.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- vis-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in an IEEE VIS paper body versus its supplemental materials, covering the VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget, the supplemental video that VIS reviewers routinely watch, the one-week supplemental deadline extension, double-blind supplemental anonymization, and how to split a visualization paper between the reviewed pages and the archive.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- socc-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing ACM SoCC evaluations, covering real or realistic deployments over simulation, production or representative workloads and traces, tail-latency and cost as first-class metrics, fair tuned baselines, scale and multi-tenancy behavior, reproducible measurement pipelines, and matching evidence to the shape of each cloud claim.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —