Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.409 skill-uri din 2.375 de depozite · actualizat acum 14 ore
49.409 skill-uri
- rag-architectalirezarezvani/claude-skillsDesign a RAG pipeline: chunk size, embedding model, vector database and retrieval quality metrics. Use whenever the user builds search over their docs, picks a vector store or finds answers miss the right context.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 29,2 K↓ —
- cav-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) empirical evaluation, covering standard benchmark sets (SV-COMP/SMT-COMP/HWMCC/VNN-COMP), fair baseline solvers with pinned versions and equal resource limits, timeout-dominated comparisons, soundness cross-checks and proof witnesses, cactus/scatter reporting, and matching evidence to the shape of each verification claim.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- setupfcakyon/claude-codex-settingsThis skill should be used when user encounters "Azure MCP error", "Azure authentication failed", "az login required", "Azure CLI not found", or needs help configuring Azure MCP integration.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,2 K↓ —
- vldb-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a VLDB paper, covering workload and dataset realism at scale, competitor tuning fairness, scalability curves versus single points, tail-latency and throughput reporting, ablations that isolate the mechanism, and the loss-case disclosure PVLDB reviewers look for first.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vis-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in an IEEE VIS paper body versus its supplemental materials, covering the VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget, the supplemental video that VIS reviewers routinely watch, the one-week supplemental deadline extension, double-blind supplemental anonymization, and how to split a visualization paper between the reviewed pages and the archive.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ponderNouhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsConvergent multi-pass deliberation and code review ledger that enumerates units, grades every unit against a lens rubric, runs four-perspective deliberation (Skeptic, Builder, Dreamer, Empath), records append-only finding deltas, verifies phantom-unit removals across all historical paths, and enforces 1.00 coverage and zero-churn convergence before stopping. Use when the user says "ponder <anything>" ("ponder the UI", "ponder our error handling", "ponder this PR"), "run a ponder audit", "grade every unit with the ponder ledger", "run four-voice Skeptic/Builder/Dreamer/Empath deliberation", or asks for a coverage-gated multi-pass lens audit across files or screens where stopping early would miss units. Also use to resume or recover a ponder session in flight - "where were we in the ponder", "carry on pondering", or an existing .ponder/ directory - by running ponder status rather than starting over.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- workhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsUse for execution, debugging, verification, planning, and shipping when the user's Emulo working profile should guide the task. Do not use for design/UI/UX work, marketing or social writing, or Emulo setup/mining.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —Apare și în 2 alte depozite
- atc-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) submission is evaluated — the two-round extended-abstract model, the round-one gate by two reviewers, the round-two read by 3-4 reviewers, double-blind reviewing, rebuttal, conditional acceptance with shepherding, and how ATC differs from OSDI/SOSP/NSDI.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- setup-app-insightsmicrosoft/power-platform-skillsConfigure optional customer-owned Application Insights telemetry for a Power Apps mobile app — enable it against an existing Azure resource, change the resource, or disable it. Standalone, and invoked by /edit-app.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,1 K↓ —
- email-lifecycle-lifecycle-auditgooseworks-ai/goose-skillsStep of the email-lifecycle playbook: audits list, consent, live flows, recent sends and sending setup, marking every item verified, from-you or unknown. Run email-lifecycle instead; not for direct use.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- scrapecreators-apigooseworks-ai/goose-skillsProvider reference for collecting public profiles, posts, comments, transcripts, trends, and ad-library data from major social platforms through ScrapeCreators. Use as a dependency of research workflows, not as the final user-facing deliverable.BrowserFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- clarify-question-loopagentlas-ai/Agentlas-OSUse when a meta-agent request is too ambiguous to safely generate, package, publish, or adapt without one to five targeted questions.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
- goframe-v2hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsGoFrame development skill. TRIGGER when writing/modifying Go files, implementing services, creating APIs, or database operations. DO NOT TRIGGER for frontend/shell scripts.DateFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- cloud-api-operationsTencentCloudBase/CloudBase-AI-ToolkitOperate Tencent Cloud control-plane resources (monitoring/alarms, CLB, CAM roles, COS, MySQL, SCF) via cloud APIs when no dedicated MCP tool covers the task. Use when a task needs control-plane operations beyond CloudBase's own tooling, or when a callCloudApi call failed and needs classifying. Also covers enterprise platform integration: wrapping CloudBase MCP into an organization-specific MCP (tool trimming, dangerous-action interception, per-user API Key distribution, audit) — use when the user mentions 企业接入 / 封装 MCP / 企业专属 MCP / 多租户凭证下发 / platform MCP wrapping. See recipes/enterprise-mcp-wrapper.md.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,2 K↓ —Apare și în 5 alte depozite
- hsb-appNVIDIA/skillsDiscover and run Holoscan Sensor Bridge example applications on a connected devkit. Filters available apps by the user's platform, HSB software version, board type, and sensors. Supports timed execution, failure analysis, code-edit suggestions, and iterative re-runs.RedactareFără avertismente★ 3,8 K↓ —
- reviewhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsGive advisory feedback on a plan, design or code change. Use when: asked for an opinion or a look-over, even informally. Not for acceptance; use Validate.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —Apare și în 2 alte depozite
- cell-star-methodsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to build Cell's mandatory STAR Methods — the Key Resources Table, the three Resource Availability subsections, Experimental Model and Subject Details, Method Details, and Quantification and Statistical Analysis, in the exact required order.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cikm-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when turning an accepted CIKM paper into its ACM proceedings version inside the short notification-to-camera-ready window, covering de-anonymization, the e-rights and TAPS pipeline into the ACM Digital Library, CCS concepts and metadata, GenAI-disclosure retention, artifact link publication, and Rome presentation logistics.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- asplos-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ASPLOS campaign across the two-deadline cycle — sequencing evidence building, the September 9, 2026 submission gate, author-response windows, the December 21 notification, Major Revision resubmission six weeks later, artifact evaluation, and the April 2027 conference in Crete, with owners per risk.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cav-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) submission is evaluated, covering the two-stage reviewing process (two reviews then an early-reject filter, then two more reviews with a rebuttal), the partial double-anonymity by category, the accept/reject outcome, the optional non-conditional artifact evaluation, and how CAV differs from TACAS and FMCAD.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ase-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research submission is evaluated, covering double-anonymous review, the early-rejection stage before rebuttal, the Accept / Revision / Reject outcomes, the criteria-bound revision round, and how ASE's process differs from FSE's PACMSE Major Revision, ICSE's cycles, and ISSTA's rounds.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- catch-upNouhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsBrief the user in plain language on what happened in this conversation since their last typed message, with pictures where they help, then lay out every decision waiting on them with a recommendation, evidence and risk. Use when the user runs /catch-up.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- routerhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsFind the right doc before reading code. Use when asked "where is X documented", "is there a spec/ADR for X", "what's the roadmap", "open bugs", "read the docs about X", or "share the docs".PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- wacv-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing WACV experiments, covering Applications-track systems evidence (latency, power, robustness under real constraints) versus Algorithms-track matched-baseline novelty, comparative assessment under the deployed condition, uncertainty over seeds and sessions, ablations, and evidence that survives the two-round review.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
os-ask-simple
kharmanskyi/open-steps
De la autor
ALWAYS invoke this skill before asking the user any technical question or offering options, and whenever they ask to be asked in plain words - "ask simple", "ask me simply", "ask me in plain words" - in any language. ALWAYS invoke it too when the user asks for your view on a technical choice: whether it is worth doing, more than the problem needs, or replaceable by something simpler, and which option you would take. Invoke it even when the code makes the answer look obvious: the checks are what make the answer more than a guess. Rewrites the question in plain words and always ends with one marked recommendation. A structural choice first passes six checks, shown as a table: effort now, simpler substitute, extra work later, lock-in, over-engineering, easy to undo. Doing nothing is always weighed.
Instalare
npx skills add kharmanskyi/open-steps --skill os-ask-simple -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/os-ask-simple/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Fișiere (2)
- SKILL.md
- references/01-sign-in-now-or-later.md