Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
48.168 de skill-uri din 2.325 de depozite · actualizat acum 21 de ore
47.055 de skill-uri
- writing-testsamplifthq/openmeldGates whether a new test should exist and forces it to be efficient, protecting CI from low-value test bloat. Use before any change to what a pytest, Jest, or Playwright test asserts or sets up, down to one fixture or one assertion added to an existing block. Front-loads the value bar (every test must catch a realistic regression no existing test already catches; extend the nearest existing test before writing a new standalone one; test behavior through the public interface, not implementation details; collapse near-duplicates into parameterized cases) and the efficiency bar (deterministic, isolated, fast; pick the cheapest test level; Django TestCase over TransactionTestCase; no sleeps, no real network; no time bombs from absolute dates left to age against the real clock; no database a test never uses). Includes a "don't write it" decision tree. For fixing an existing flaky test use `/fixing-flaky-tests`; after this gate says a Playwright test is warranted, use `/playwright-test` for mechanics.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cav-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) submission against the verification literature across CAV, TACAS, FMCAD, VMCAI, POPL/PLDI, and the journals (FMSD, JAR, TOCL, STTT), writing delta-first contrast rather than a citation catalog, crediting the right benchmark and tool lineages, keeping self-citations double-anonymous for the anonymized categories, and handling concurrent and prior-version overlap.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- cikm-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a CIKM submission for EasyChair readiness across the five tracks, covering page budgets with appendices counted inside, the mandatory GenAI Usage Disclosure section, author-reviewer nomination, double-blind rules with arXiv declaration, the abstract-gate authorship freeze, and desk-reject triggers.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- chi-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing an accepted ACM CHI paper for publication — the TAPS source upload, the PCS publication-ready package, mandatory accessibility work (alt text, screen-reader-friendly PDFs, table headers), video previews, ACM's open-access model, e-rights, and registration deadlines.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- fixing-flaky-testsamplifthq/openmeldGuides an agent through reproducing, root-causing, fixing, and validating flaky tests in the PostHog monorepo. Use when a test fails intermittently in CI but passes on rerun or locally, when `hogli ci:insights` or the debugging-ci-failures skill classifies a failure as a flaky test, when given a GitHub Actions URL for a flaky job, when asked to check Trunk Flaky Tests for a test, PR, or master, or when asked to deflake, stabilize, or fix a flaky Jest, pytest, or Playwright test. Core discipline: reproduce locally before changing anything, fix the root cause (never mask it with sleeps, retries, or bigger timeouts), and prove the fix with an N-run validation loop sized to the observed failure rate. Stabilizing is not the only valid outcome — the skill also gates whether the test should exist, so deleting a test that catches nothing real, or re-leveling one that flakes because of the level it runs at, are first-class endings.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ase-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when writing the related-work and positioning of an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) paper, covering the automated-SE literature lanes, delta-first positioning against prior tools/techniques, fair head-to-head framing, and double-anonymous self-citation.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- ccs-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ACM CCS project timeline across the two HotCRP review cycles, from venue fit through abstract registration, full-paper upload, rebuttal, notification, revision, artifact evaluation, ACM camera-ready, and in-person presentation, with backward-planning offsets and the security big-four deadline-hopping calendar.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- ase-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing the ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) camera-ready after acceptance or a successful revision, covering systematic de-anonymization, the extra content page, the mandatory Data Availability finalization, the correct IEEE/ACM template and metadata, permanentized artifact links, and dual IEEE-Xplore/ACM-DL production checks.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- atc-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing the ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) camera-ready after a conditional accept — de-anonymizing systematically, folding in the shepherd's required revisions, permanentizing artifact links, completing ACM Open Access metadata and the transition APC, and passing production checks for the November Hong Kong proceedings.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- aamas-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an AAMAS project timeline from venue fit through abstract, full-paper or extended-abstract upload, supplementary material, the double-blind rebuttal, decision, IFAAMAS camera-ready, registration, and presentation, with track-specific deadlines and backward-planning offsets for a game-theory-plus-experiments paper.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- icdm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical evaluation for an ICDM (IEEE International Conference on Data Mining) paper - mining-task definition, strong and fairly-tuned baselines, ablations that isolate the named mechanism, scalability curves that test scale claims, and discovery-validity checks that separate real findings from evaluation artifacts.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- setupfcakyon/claude-codex-settingsThis skill should be used when the user asks "how to setup GitHub CLI", "configure gh", "gh auth not working", "GitHub CLI connection failed", "gh CLI error", or needs help with GitHub authentication.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,2 K↓ —
- sci-figuresbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to finalize Science display items — panel/word budget, column-width sizing, minimum font sizes, color-accessibility, and showing the data (points over bars). Enforces figure rigor before submission.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- nejm-reportingbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to select and enforce the correct EQUATOR reporting guideline for a clinical study headed to NEJM — CONSORT for RCTs (with the participant flow diagram), STROBE for observational, PRISMA for systematic reviews — and to build the required checklist and diagram before submission.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- aaai-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an AAAI main technical track submission for OpenReview readiness, double-blind anonymity, page limits, reproducibility checklist, supplementary material, author limits, multiple-submission policy, and AAAI AI-use policy compliance.JuridicFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- sci-framingbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when locking the conceptual advance and the "why now" before drafting for Science (AAAS) — converts a correct result into a Science-shaped narrative that leads with the broad advance rather than the background, and seeds the title, abstract, and cover letter.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- uai-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing UAI experiments where inference quality is the endpoint, covering calibration and coverage measurement, posterior diagnostics, structure-recovery metrics for causal and graphical models, seeded repeated runs, baselines from both sampling and optimization families, and mapping each claim to its evidence.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- icra-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the experimental section of an ICRA paper — real-robot versus simulation-only evidence, trial counts and success-rate reporting, task distributions and resets, baseline fairness on shared hardware, sim-to-real transfer claims, failure-mode analysis, and the statistics robotics reviewers actually expect.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- focs-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding whether and how computation appears in a FOCS (IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science) paper — a venue that accepts on theorems with no evaluation section expected — covering machine-verified case analyses, computer-discovered constructions, and honest illustrative plots.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- cav-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) empirical evaluation, covering standard benchmark sets (SV-COMP/SMT-COMP/HWMCC/VNN-COMP), fair baseline solvers with pinned versions and equal resource limits, timeout-dominated comparisons, soundness cross-checks and proof witnesses, cactus/scatter reporting, and matching evidence to the shape of each verification claim.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- dac-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical evaluation of an ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) Research Manuscript, covering standard EDA benchmark suites (ISPD, EPFL, ISCAS/ITC, TAU, CircuitNet, OpenROAD flows), fair state-of-the-art baselines, QoR/PPA reporting with runtime, per-benchmark honesty, ablations that isolate the mechanism, and contamination-aware ML-for-EDA evaluation.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- architecturehashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsCompare interface designs and find structural friction. Use when: a change spreads across modules or a boundary is unclear. For code changes, use Refactor.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- chi-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the studies behind an ACM CHI paper — matching evidence shape to contribution type, powering quantitative experiments, making qualitative work rigorous and auditable, reporting participants and ethics properly, and avoiding the ADR-Data and ADR-Method screening grounds.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- cav-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) submission for portal readiness, covering the four submission categories (Regular / Short Tool / Short Application / Industrial Experience & Case Studies), the LNCS page limits, the per-category anonymization matrix, the artifact-intent declaration, and desk-reject triage before the AoE paper deadline.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
plan-campaign-channel-decision
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills
MarketingActualizat acum 5 zile
De la autor
Step of the plan-campaign playbook: marks each candidate channel Run, Test, Later or No with a brand-fact reason and founder hours. Run plan-campaign instead; not for direct use.
Instalare
npx skills add gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill plan-campaign-channel-decision -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/plan-campaign-channel-decision/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: MIT
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență77
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție50
Fișiere (2)
- SKILL.md
- skill.meta.json