Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.409 skill-uri din 2.375 de depozite · actualizat acum 5 ore
49.409 skill-uri
- icml-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when stress-testing ICML experimental evidence before submission or rebuttal, including strong tuned baselines, mechanism-isolating ablations, seed variance and confidence intervals, compute disclosure, data leakage and split construction, reproducibility, negative results, and fit to ICML soundness, originality, and significance scoring.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ap-framework-validatorSpielewoy/autoprompt-skillReport the compatibility redirect to `ap-independent-checker`; this retired role cannot perform new work.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,2 K↓ —
- corl-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing experiments for a CoRL robot-learning paper — seeds and evaluation-episode counts, task-suite breadth, real-robot versus simulation evidence, sim-to-real gap measurement, baseline fairness across BC/RL/VLA families, generalization splits, and statistics for success-rate claims.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- hri-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when drafting or revising an ACM/IEEE HRI full paper's structure and prose for an interdisciplinary audience — leading with the human-robot contribution and research questions, making hypotheses and measures explicit, describing the robot embodiment, keeping claims proportional to the study within the 8-page acmart budget, and writing so the chosen track's contribution type is unmistakable.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- attention-resetmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsGet your attention back with a 30-day protocol that assumes you'll break it — a screen-time ledger without moralizing, friction engineering (what to delete, grayscale, where the phone sleeps), planned relapses, and honest replacement activities for the boredom that shows up on day 3. Use when someone says 'my screen time is 7 hours', 'I want a dumbphone', 'digital detox', 'I can't read books anymore', or 'my attention span is gone'. Produces the ledger, a personal friction plan, and the 30-day protocol with expected failure points.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- eccv-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the experimental program of an ECCV paper — benchmark selection that survives a September conference, matched-substrate baseline fairness in the foundation-model era, ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism, qualitative failure evidence, and run sequencing toward a March freeze.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- osdi-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an OSDI submission — choosing mature baselines and realistic workloads, structuring the section around research questions, measuring scalability and tail behavior, quantifying the design's costs, and fitting the evidence into the 12-page reviewed body.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- uai-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising a UAI manuscript for probabilistic-inference readers, enforcing precise notation for distributions, graphs, and interventions, explicit assumption and identifiability statements, an 8-page main part that carries the whole argument while proofs sit in the appendix, and claims calibrated to what the theory and experiments show.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- soda-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding whether and how experiments belong in a SODA (ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms) paper — SODA's scope includes experimental validation but theorems carry the decision, so this skill designs supporting numerics honestly and routes implementation-led work to co-located ALENEX or to SEA.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- edbt-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing EDBT empirical evaluations for database-systems work, covering real workloads and datasets, fair and tuned baselines, honest measurement across realistic scales, reproducible harnesses, and the higher bar of the Experiments & Analysis paper where the measurement itself is the contribution.DateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ndss-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an NDSS paper — attack demonstrations, defense evaluations under adaptive adversaries, and Internet measurements — choosing between testbed, emulation, and live experiments and meeting NDSS's deployment-realism evidence bar.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cscw-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical work behind a CSCW paper — interview and ethnographic rigor, trace and log analysis, surveys, deployments, and mixed methods — matching each method's own validity standard and the ethics of studying real communities.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cav-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper body versus its optional appendix and artifact, covering the LNCS page limits, the rule that reviewers are not obliged to read the appendix so decision-critical content stays in the body, where full proofs and benchmark tables live, and double-anonymous supplementary material for the anonymized categories.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- iclr-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing ICLR experiments, including baselines, ablations, scaling laws, robustness, statistics, benchmarks, human evaluation, and compute reporting. Use when a reviewer questions whether a representation-learning or model gain is real, when you must isolate one mechanism with an ablation, or when preparing a small compute-matched control that can be posted inline during the public discussion period.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- verify-form-validationreticlehq/reticleCheck that a form actually rejects bad input: the error message renders, the submit button stays disabled, and no request goes out. Use when validation logic was written but never driven, when a "required" or pattern check looks right on screen but was never proven, or when a bug report says the form submitted invalid data anyway.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- chi-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when interpreting the ACM CHI Papers review pipeline — 1AC and 2AC roles, the A/ARR/RR/RRX/X recommendation scale, desk-reject and rubric-based assisted desk-reject screening, the revise-and-resubmit threshold, round-2 PC decisions — and what each stage means for authors.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- creator-profile-teardownScrapeCreators/social-media-research-skillsUse when the user wants to analyze a creator, influencer, founder, or brand social account and understand positioning, content pillars, outlier posts, hooks, format choices, audience reaction, and what can be copied or tested.AlteleFără avertismente★ 5,4 K↓ —
- minutes-briefsilverstein/minutesFast non-interactive briefing before any meeting — auto-detects your next calendar event, pulls relationship history, surfaces open commitments, and produces a one-page brief in under 30 seconds. Use this whenever the user says "brief me", "give me a quick brief", "what's coming up", "background on my next call", "who am I meeting next", "brief me on Sarah", "I have a call in 10 min", "quick rundown", or right before walking into a meeting. Different from /minutes-prep — brief is the fast hook-fireable version that doesn't ask questions and doesn't set goals. Use brief when speed matters; use prep when the user wants to think hard about goals first.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
- memory-hygienehuytieu/COG-second-brainPeriodic trust sweep of persistent memory and durable knowledge notes - re-verifies environment-dependent claims against the live environment, stamps last_verified + confidence, and proposes archiving drifted entriesProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- oss-contribution-researchrampstackco/claude-skillsResearch and prepare an outside contribution to an open-source repo, then stop at a queue item for a human to approve: policy check, intake, duplicate check, reproduction, patch, the repo's own checks, an independent critic rerun, and a disclosed, hashed draft of the exact text to post. Use this skill whenever the user wants to contribute to someone else's repo, fix an upstream bug, pick up a good-first-issue, draft an AI-assisted pull request for an outside project, follow up on their own outside PR, or run a gated contribution pipeline. Triggers on open source contribution, contribute to this repo, upstream fix, outside PR, external PR, good first issue, fix this issue in their repo, contribution research, AI-assisted PR, disclose AI in PR, reply to review on my PR. Also triggers when the user names an issue in a repo they do not maintain and asks for a fix, even if they do not say contribute.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1 K↓ —
- snsitsmostafa/aws-agent-skillsAWS SNS notification service for pub/sub messaging. Use when creating topics, managing subscriptions, configuring message filtering, sending notifications, or setting up mobile push.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,2 K↓ —
- drive-desktop-appreticlehq/reticleDrive and verify an Electron or Tauri desktop app from the inside, including the main-process and Rust IPC calls a browser tool cannot see. Use when a desktop app needs testing, when a feature works in the browser but not in the packaged app, when an IPC or invoke call needs proving, when a desktop screenshot or visual diff is wanted, or when you need a headless run of a desktop UI in CI.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- user-feedback-aggregationrampstackco/claude-skillsCollecting and synthesizing user feedback across channels (support tickets, NPS, in-app feedback, sales calls, social mentions, customer councils) into a continuous signal that informs product decisions. The triage discipline that distinguishes loudest-voice (whoever complains most wins) from averaged-noise (every signal weighted equally) from triaged-synthesis (signal weighted by source quality, frequency, and decision relevance). Triggers on user feedback, customer feedback aggregation, NPS, support ticket analysis, customer councils, feedback synthesis, voice of customer, feedback triage, in-app feedback. Also triggers when feedback channels overflow with volume that does not produce decisions, when the loudest-voice problem is steering roadmap, or when continuous feedback streams need synthesis discipline.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1 K↓ —
- app-briefdaveebbelaar/bamaOne-page brief (docs/BRIEF.md) for a new macOS app, written before any code. Use when the user has an app idea, wants to replace an app they pay for, or the research and clone skills are done.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
amap
nano-muse/nanoMuse
AlteleActualizat ieri
De la autor
Places, routes, travel times, distances and weather in China through the 高德地图 (Amap) MCP server. Use when the user asks how far, how long, how to get somewhere (car, transit, bike, foot), what is near a place, or about the weather in a Chinese city.
Instalare
npx skills add nano-muse/nanoMuse --skill amap -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/amap/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Fără descărcare: licența acestui skill (GPL-3.0) nu ne permite să-i redistribuim fișierele. Comenzile de instalare le iau direct de pe GitHub.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: GPL-3.0
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență82
Întreținere100
Licență80
Adopție55
Fișiere (1)
- SKILL.md