Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.409 skill-uri din 2.375 de depozite · actualizat acum 1 oră
49.409 skill-uri
- minutes-debriefsilverstein/minutesPost-meeting debrief — analyzes what happened, compares outcomes to your prep intentions, tracks decision evolution. Use when the user says "debrief", "what just happened in that meeting", "what did we decide", "debrief that call", "post-meeting", "what changed", or right after stopping a recording.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,6 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
- agent-severancemohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsOffboard an AI agent the way you'd offboard an employee — inventory what it knew and touched, export then purge its memory, revoke every credential and access grant, and write the handover for its successor (human or agent). Use when decommissioning an agent or bot, switching agent vendors, ending an AI pilot, or when someone asks 'what did this thing have access to?'. Produces a severance checklist, an access-revocation table, a memory disposition record, and a successor handover.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- edit-offline-profilemicrosoft/power-platform-skillsInternal mobile-app workflow read and executed only by mobile orchestrators to change one table's scope, columns, or sync settings in a Mobile Offline Profile.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,1 K↓ —
- ab-test-plannermohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsDesign statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- oma-coordinationfirst-fluke/oh-my-agentGuide for coordinating PM, Frontend, Backend, Mobile, and QA agents on complex projects via CLI. Use for manual step-by-step coordination and workflow guidance.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- youtube-scriptmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsWrite a long-form video script for YouTube — an explainer, tutorial, video essay, review, or talking-head — built on the packaging→cold-open→value-stack→retention structure that holds watch-time past the drop-off cliffs. Use when asked to script a YouTube video, write a long-form or explainer/tutorial video script, outline a video essay, or turn a blog post/talk into a video. Produces title + thumbnail concepts, a timed cold open, a segmented body with retention devices and B-roll cues, integrated CTAs, an outro/end-screen, and a description with chapter timestamps. Distinct from [[short-form-script]] (15–60s vertical).MediaFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- ai-usage-policymohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsWrite an AI usage policy people can actually follow — approved tools, data rules, disclosure duties, and review obligations, in one page instead of legal fog. Use when asked for a company AI policy, acceptable-use rules for ChatGPT/Claude/Copilot at work, guidance on what data may go into AI tools, or to fix a policy nobody reads. Produces a one-page usable policy plus the decision log behind it. Not a substitute for legal advice; pairs with compliance-checklist for regulatory mapping and ai-ethics-review for system-level assessments.JuridicFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- ai-content-collaborationrampstackco/claude-skillsHow humans and AI compose in content workflows. Where AI legitimately participates, where humans must own, hybrid workflow patterns, voice ownership preservation, the AI slop problem, disclosure and transparency, team calibration, and the ethics of intellectually honest AI-assisted content production. Triggers on AI content workflow, AI-assisted writing, hybrid content production, AI in editorial, AI slop, AI disclosure, AI usage policy, AI content ethics, voice preservation with AI, team AI calibration. Also triggers when content feels generic despite quality tools, when team AI usage has drifted into inconsistency, or when a regulated or trust-sensitive context requires explicit AI policy.JuridicFără avertismente★ 1 K↓ —
- cell-star-methodsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to build Cell's mandatory STAR Methods — the Key Resources Table, the three Resource Availability subsections, Experimental Model and Subject Details, Method Details, and Quantification and Statistical Analysis, in the exact required order.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cikm-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when turning an accepted CIKM paper into its ACM proceedings version inside the short notification-to-camera-ready window, covering de-anonymization, the e-rights and TAPS pipeline into the ACM Digital Library, CCS concepts and metadata, GenAI-disclosure retention, artifact link publication, and Rome presentation logistics.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- apology-lettermohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsWrite a sincere, effective apology to a customer, group, or the public. Use when asked to write an apology, say sorry to a customer or community, make amends after a mistake, or respond to a complaint with an apology. Produces a genuine apology — acknowledgement, taking responsibility, empathy for the impact, the concrete fix and prevention, and an offer to make it right — in the right tone, without excuses or non-apologies.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,5 K↓ —
- atc-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) submission is evaluated — the two-round extended-abstract model, the round-one gate by two reviewers, the round-two read by 3-4 reviewers, double-blind reviewing, rebuttal, conditional acceptance with shepherding, and how ATC differs from OSDI/SOSP/NSDI.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cav-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) submission is evaluated, covering the two-stage reviewing process (two reviews then an early-reject filter, then two more reviews with a rebuttal), the partial double-anonymity by category, the accept/reject outcome, the optional non-conditional artifact evaluation, and how CAV differs from TACAS and FMCAD.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- meeting-transcripthuytieu/COG-second-brainProcess meeting recordings and notes into structured decisions, action items, and team dynamics with intelligent noise filteringProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- ase-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research submission is evaluated, covering double-anonymous review, the early-rejection stage before rebuttal, the Accept / Revision / Reject outcomes, the criteria-bound revision round, and how ASE's process differs from FSE's PACMSE Major Revision, ICSE's cycles, and ISSTA's rounds.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- export-open-issueshuytieu/COG-second-brainAudit and export open issues from any project tracker with summary analysis and vault archivalProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —
- vis-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising an IEEE VIS paper for a task-grounded visualization contribution on the first page, a design rationale that ties each visual encoding and interaction to a task, evaluation matched to the contribution type, honest limitations, and disciplined use of the VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget for a paper that will be read as an IEEE TVCG journal article.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- roadmap-planningrampstackco/claude-skillsBuild a multi-quarter roadmap from a backlog of ideas, requests, and ongoing initiatives. Use this skill when planning the next quarter, sequencing dependent work, balancing build vs improve vs maintain, or making the case for what NOT to do. Triggers on roadmap, quarterly planning, what should we build next, sequencing, prioritization, OKR planning, capacity planning, what's on the roadmap, plan the year, what to ship next quarter. Also triggers when stakeholders are pulling in different directions and the team needs a defensible plan.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1 K↓ —
- influencer-prospectingScrapeCreators/social-media-research-skillsUse when the user wants to find creators, influencers, affiliates, or social accounts in a niche for outreach, partnerships, sponsorships, UGC, seeding, or competitive research. Produces scored prospect lists from public social data.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 5,4 K↓ —
- wacv-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing WACV experiments, covering Applications-track systems evidence (latency, power, robustness under real constraints) versus Algorithms-track matched-baseline novelty, comparative assessment under the deployed condition, uncertainty over seeds and sessions, ablations, and evidence that survives the two-round review.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- no-ai-slophuytieu/COG-second-brainSelf-evolving second brain with 35 AI skills, 10 agents, and people CRM. Closed-loop harness: a V-model verification lifecycle where the worker never grades its own homework. Plus paired anti-slop design skills for marketing and product UI. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Kiro, Gemini CLI, Codex.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,3 K↓ —Apare și în 1 alt depozit
- aaai-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- wsdm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a WSDM paper - offline ranking and recommendation metrics with bias controls, temporal-split protocols for interaction logs, baseline selection from recent WSDM/SIGIR/KDD editions, ablations that isolate the mechanism, efficiency reporting, and online-evidence framing.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- create-issueNoufcakyon/claude-codex-settingsThis skill should be used when the user asks to "create an issue", "file a bug", "report a problem", "rewrite an issue", or "improve an issue title or body".AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,2 K↓ —
finishing-a-development-branch
GanyuanRan/Aegis
ProductivitateActualizat alaltăieri
De la autor
Use when verified work needs integration or cleanup of an existing task-created branch/worktree, or the user explicitly requests merge, PR, or branch lifecycle handling.
Instalare
npx skills add GanyuanRan/Aegis --skill finishing-a-development-branch -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/finishing-a-development-branch/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Doar instrucțiuniNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: MIT
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 88
Securitate100
Proveniență78
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție51
Fișiere (1)
- SKILL.md