Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.404 skill-uri din 2.375 de depozite · actualizat acum 20 de minute
49.404 skill-uri
- aaai-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- aaai-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- wsdm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a WSDM paper - offline ranking and recommendation metrics with bias controls, temporal-split protocols for interaction logs, baseline selection from recent WSDM/SIGIR/KDD editions, ablations that isolate the mechanism, efficiency reporting, and online-evidence framing.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- sosp-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a SOSP paper — mapping every claim to an experiment, choosing baselines a systems PC will accept as fair, mixing microbenchmarks with end-to-end and failure runs, reporting tails and overheads honestly, and isolating the mechanism the design credits.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vis-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in an IEEE VIS paper body versus its supplemental materials, covering the VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget, the supplemental video that VIS reviewers routinely watch, the one-week supplemental deadline extension, double-blind supplemental anonymization, and how to split a visualization paper between the reviewed pages and the archive.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- socc-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing ACM SoCC evaluations, covering real or realistic deployments over simulation, production or representative workloads and traces, tail-latency and cost as first-class metrics, fair tuned baselines, scale and multi-tenancy behavior, reproducible measurement pipelines, and matching evidence to the shape of each cloud claim.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- stoc-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when judging whether computation belongs in a STOC (ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing) paper at all — STOC accepts on theorems, with no empirical-evaluation expectation — and when it does, scoping it as certified proof computation, constructive search, or clearly labeled illustration rather than benchmarking.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- popl-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing the empirical component of a POPL paper — deciding whether evidence should be a mechanization, a prototype, case studies, or benchmarks; reporting proof effort and case-study coverage honestly; and keeping performance numbers in a supporting role so the formal claim stays the paper's center of gravity.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pldi-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing a PLDI evaluation — choosing defensible benchmark suites and baseline compiler configurations, measuring runtime, compile time, and memory with warmup and variance discipline, running ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism, and scoping claims to the platforms measured.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- rss-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsJournal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包，从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程，助你快速发论文。PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- 02-bib-verifyagentscope-ai/OpenJudgeVerify a BibTeX file for hallucinated or fabricated references by cross-checking every entry against CrossRef, arXiv, and DBLP. Reports each reference as verified, suspect, or not found, with field-level mismatch details (title, authors, year, DOI). Use when the user wants to check a .bib file for fake citations, validate references in a paper, or audit bibliography entries for accuracy.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1 K↓ —
- rss-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsJournal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包，从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程，助你快速发论文。PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ppopp-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning a PPoPP submission campaign end to end, sequencing the summer paper deadline, the author-response rebuttal window, notification, the post-acceptance CGO-shared artifact-evaluation round, the camera-ready, and the presentation inside the co-located HPCA/CGO/PPoPP/CC week.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pods-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an ACM PODS research submission for EasyChair readiness, covering the chosen cycle's abstract-then-paper deadlines, the acmsmall[review,anonymous] format and 15-page budget, the at-submission proof appendix, lightweight double-anonymity, the declared conflicts of interest, PACMMOD-track publication, and desk-risk triage before the AoE cutoff.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pmla-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when running the final pre-submission preflight for PMLA (Publications of the Modern Language Association) via the ScholarOne site — venue selection, MLA-membership eligibility, anonymous preparation, word range, MLA style, cover sheet, and AI-content disclosure. Final checks; it does not draft content.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pldi-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a PLDI submission for HotCRP readiness — the single annual November deadline, the 20-pages-of-text-excluding-bibliography cap in single-column acmsmall format, double-blind hygiene across tool names and repositories, dual-submission rules, and summary-rejection triggers before the cutoff.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pnas-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse as the final preflight before submitting to PNAS — a complete checklist across significance, track, Significance Statement, abstract, classification + keywords, figures, statistics, data, references, and required files. Bundles a checklist and a PNAS cover-letter template. Emits GO/NO-GO.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- nsdi-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when running the final pre-upload audit of an NSDI submission — the abstract-then-paper week on the per-deadline HotCRP site, 11:59 pm US Eastern cutoffs, the 12-page cap with references and appendices outside it, track-dependent anonymization, the eight-paper author cap, and the resubmission-ban check.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pnas-statisticsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to enforce PNAS's statistics and reproducibility reporting — n and replication, test choice and assumptions, effect sizes with uncertainty, multiple-comparison control, randomization/blinding, sample-size justification, pre-registration where relevant, and reproducible code.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- lancet-ethicsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to satisfy The Lancet's clinical-ethics and research-integrity requirements — ethics-committee approval and informed consent under the Declaration of Helsinki, the Declaration of interests, ICMJE author contributions, the role-of-the-funding-source statement, the data-sharing statement, patient and public involvement, and SAGER sex/gender plus equity reporting.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- micro-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning a MICRO campaign end to end — the April-to-Athens 2026 cycle clock, the four-venue architecture calendar (MICRO/ISCA/HPCA/ASPLOS) seen from MICRO's October seat, resubmission lattices after each outcome, and starting the MICRO 2027 evaluation stack early enough to matter.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- kdd-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning a KDD submission against the data-mining lineage (prior KDD volumes, ICDM, SDM, WSDM, CIKM, WWW) and the ML flagships, handling venue misattribution traps, cross-cycle resubmission overlap, concurrent arXiv work, and the mechanism-contrast style of novelty argument that ACM SIGKDD reviewers expect.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- nejm-statisticsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to enforce NEJM's clinical statistical reporting — confidence intervals over bare P values, the pre-specified intention-to-treat primary analysis, multiplicity control for secondary endpoints, pre-specified subgroups with interaction tests, missing-data handling, and absolute risk with NNT alongside relative measures.TestareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- mlsys-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an MLSys submission cycle end to end, from venue-fit and track choice through evaluation freeze, the October deadline, the four-day January response, notification, camera-ready, the March artifact-evaluation submission, and the May conference, with backward planning built around scarce GPU time and team ownership.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
code-reviewer
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
InginerieActualizat acum 11 ore
De la autor
Use for any code review: a pull request, a diff, a commit, or a pasted function, handler or file in TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin, C#/.NET, Java, C, C++, Rust, Ruby, PHP or Dart/Flutter. Applies per-language rule packs (security such as SQL injection and missing auth, async and resource handling, error handling, performance) and scripts that score a PR's risk and complexity, then gives a merge verdict with blocking and non-blocking findings. Use whenever the user asks to review, check or look over code, says 'code review', 'review this PR', 'review this diff' or 'is this safe to merge', or asks what is wrong with a snippet, even a single function.
Instalare
npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill code-reviewer -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/code-reviewer/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Rulează scripturile incluseNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: MIT
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
- Include scripturi pe care nu le-am verificatScăzut
De ce 88
Securitate85
Proveniență94
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție69
Fișiere (31)
- README.md
- SKILL.md
- assets/sample_c_clean.c
- assets/sample_c_smells.c
- assets/sample_csharp_clean.cs
- assets/sample_csharp_smells.cs
- assets/sample_java_clean.java
- assets/sample_java_smells.java
- expected_outputs/sample_c_clean_quality.json
- expected_outputs/sample_c_smells_quality.json
- expected_outputs/sample_csharp_clean_quality.json
- expected_outputs/sample_csharp_smells_quality.json
- încă 19